[Orgy]

Oh jesus you're such type of guy. I told or quoted my reasons, not sure what else you want to hear. Try google if you really want to know more, the link of that sophisticated application is in my signature!

still not ignoring me as you said, but instead just ignoring anything where you'd have to prove your claims. interesting.

[PotatoBlood]

still not ignoring me as you said, but instead just ignoring anything where you'd have to prove your claims. interesting.

There I just ignored you ✌
Interesting indeed, you're ignoring me yet you aren't, on top of that you ignore to accept my points. Typical interwebz kiddo mentality I guess

[Vana]

I told or quoted my reasons, not sure what else you want to hear.

Care to link to that?

[PotatoBlood]

Care to link to that?

I actually don't care to link that, this doesn't mean it's not there though.
I suggest you do your own research and base your opinion on YOUR thoughts, not by reading FUD, FOMO or social media, because that's what 99% here does.

[Vana]

I actually don't care to link that, this doesn't mean it's not there though.

Actually, it does since I don't see it anywhere in your post history.

[Orgy]

Actually, it does since I don't see it anywhere in your post history.

😏

[PotatoBlood]

Actually, it does since I don't see it anywhere in your post history.

It's right here: http://b it.ly/2vTMJ4K

[Vana]

It's right here: http://b it.ly/2vTMJ4K

That's cute, but it probably took more effort to do that then it would to simply link your (non-existent) post.

[PotatoBlood]

That's cute, but it probably took more effort to do that then it would to simply link your (non-existent) post.

Yeah you're cute too, here's a quote https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id55722463

Watch this and make up your own opinion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkbSrmsYJ9c

But I doubt most of you have a timespan longer than 160 characters

[Orgy]

Yeah you're cute too, here's a quote https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id55722463

Watch this and make up your own opinion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkbSrmsYJ9c

But I doubt most of you have a timespan longer than 160 characters

woah im so surprised that you're unable to put any of this into your own words and have to just link to other shit

[The Illusionist]

Multiple big exchanges in China have agreed to list BitcoinGold and support the fork, the names of these exchange will be publicly available soon :)

[casuall]

So in a year we will also have BitcoinSilver, BitcoinCopper, BitcoinLegacy, LeBitcoin, BitcoinKing and many more?

It just seems retarted to me to create new chain whenever developers can't agree on common solution.. It adds nothing to bitcoin value.

[Orgy]

So in a year we will also have BitcoinSilver, BitcoinCopper, BitcoinLegacy, LeBitcoin, BitcoinKing and many more?

It just seems retarted to me to create new chain whenever developers can't agree on common solution.. It adds nothing to bitcoin value.

It probably wouldn't seem so retarted if you weren't retarted in the first place. Bitcoin Gold won't have much value. Maybe it'll be $100 when it comes out but I doubt it. Forking off isn't a way to give value to Bitcoin. People forking off aren't trying to add value to Bitcoin. That would be counterproductive. Bitcoin gold isn't even a disagreement between devs. It's just some random people that have gpus but likely are scared of ETH POS.

BCC is the result of multiple years of disagreement and needed to happen before segwit activation.

S2X is because of NYA.

Any other forks don't matter

[SIM-2015410]

As some of you might know Bitcoin is NOT mineable through graphic cards or GPUs for short. It uses a different kind of technology called ASIC, now ASIC is expensive and big companies need to invest millions if not hundreds of millions of dollars to become relevant in the Bitcoin mining game.

Correction, bitcoin is certainly mineable with GPUs or even CPUs, that used to be the only way to mine before ASICs became the standard. The difference is that the ASICs are so much more powerful than GPUs that people trying to mine with GPU will get no profit (in fact, lose money due to electricity bill). But it's still perfectly possible to mine in the sense of hashing blocks looking for a valid one (albeit how unlikely)

Update #3:
BTG will have Windows, Linux and Mac support for both wallets and mining on the day of release.

Update #4:
BTG will implement Lightning Network as soon as possible, to benefit from the BTC/LTC Lightning ecosystem and network effects.

Oh that means it will have segwit then ?

Things like segwit, (and thereby lightning, etc) are basically guaranteed on fork coins unless they are deliberately removed for some reason, because if it's in the bitcoin source, the "devs" (lol) don't have to do any work to add it. It's just copy paste of bitcoin with a bit of changed mining code, that's all. Same with including all OS support, it's literally done for them in bitcoin, they're adding nothing useful to it.

Bitcoin Gold, what a joke -_-
Rubbish like this gives bitcoin a bad name to people who don't know anything about it, it's just wannabe coders trying to make their own 'bitcoin'. Guaranteed this will crash and burn the day of release lmao, wonder if they'll even have it working for release or if it will be as big a fail as cash was

[Orgy]

as big a fail as cash was

yeah lol cash only secured its place at #3 marketcap in its first month lol what a failure