[Purple Kief]

First of all: Thank you to HF user Barhkk for bringing this to my attention.
Well, there's not that much to say. Tom has been faking his proof (big surprise, right?) and someone finally caught him. 


If you go to his crypter thread (https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5533328) on the following pages: 133, 135, 139, 140, 142, 144 (probably even further back, couldn't be bothered) you can find 'proof' of his antivirus bypasses.

What Tom has failed to realise (edit) is that every file has an MD5 and if those match for different scans, I call bullshit. Since I know his ass will delete/edit this before a lot of you get to see it I have taken the time to create a video showcasing this.. You're very welcome.

Links to the comments showcased in the video (compare last time editted in video if changed)
Spoiler (Click to View)
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id56443617
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id56410396
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id56381819
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id56371389
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id56341810
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id56326651


Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qsvo93xp92w


Conclusion: Most of you probably knew this already but Tom (and a lot of very high reputation members) are not who they appear to be. This thread won't affect Tom in the slightest I just wanted to bring attention to these practices as they are happening and only 10% of the HF userbase is aware of them.


EDIT: As you can see Tom is trying his hardest to make this thread dissapear from view.

[Pochinki]

Your video isn't loading buddy.

[Purple Kief]

Your video isn't loading buddy.

Weird, I defaulted it back to the link. Seems to work fine now.

[Mαxim]

Not the first time.

- https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5629064

I caught him providing a scan of his BUILDER and not STUB to lure potential customers.

Edit: Seems like he has deleted my screenshots, lol.

[kres]

Crypters on hf is like lottery , if you are lucky you will get a good one hah , at this moment i dont know even 1 good crypter(maybe darkeye but its too expensive for me).

[EwwZinga]

Wow, thanks for this.
May it be 0 reputation or 1000+, always proceed with caution.

But seriously, this is quite dumb from Tom. I mean, if I was mass scamming people, I would pay attention to the minutest of the details.

[тнe randoм dυтcн gυy]

I'm not here to defend Tom Cruise in any way, But the same MD5/SHA1 is very common when an STUB is still FUD and does not need an update, The output MD5/SHA1 will be the same if you crypt the same file 2 times in a row, (Doesn't matter if its 1 month or 1 year ago) IF you don't add any random to it. Not saying that his crypter is/isnt shit, But i rechecked it with own crypter and I'm getting the same result when it doesn't have randomizing enabled.

Go ahead and check this yourself, Not saying that the scans are not fake (You can just make a legit .vb file and scan it or w/e), But the MD5/SHA1 thing is bullshit :P

Ill say it again, Not to defend Tom, But you should use correct information when posting a 'Community Alert'

[Ranger.]

I'm not here to defend Tom Cruise in any way, But the same MD5/SHA1 is very common when an STUB is still FUD and does not need an update, The output MD5/SHA1 will be the same if you crypt the same file 2 times in a row, (Doesn't matter if its 1 month or 1 year ago) IF you don't add any random to it. Not saying that his crypter is/isnt shit, But i rechecked it with own crypter and I'm getting the same result when it doesn't have randomizing enabled.

Go ahead and check this yourself, Not saying that the scans are not fake (You can just make a legit .vb file and scan it or w/e), But the MD5/SHA1 thing is bullshit :P

Ill say it again, Not to defend Tom, But you should use correct information when posting a 'Community Alert'

> USG
> matching md5s

pick one

[Friedrich Nietzsche]

I'm not here to defend Tom Cruise in any way, But the same MD5/SHA1 is very common when an STUB is still FUD and does not need an update, The output MD5/SHA1 will be the same if you crypt the same file 2 times in a row, (Doesn't matter if its 1 month or 1 year ago) IF you don't add any random to it. Not saying that his crypter is/isnt shit, But i rechecked it with own crypter and I'm getting the same result when it doesn't have randomizing enabled.

Go ahead and check this yourself, Not saying that the scans are not fake (You can just make a legit .vb file and scan it or w/e), But the MD5/SHA1 thing is bullshit :P

Ill say it again, Not to defend Tom, But you should use correct information when posting a 'Community Alert'

If he updates the stub the hash will change, such is how the crypter works. So yeah these are probably fake scans.

[Purple Kief]

I'm not here to defend Tom Cruise in any way, But the same MD5/SHA1 is very common when an STUB is still FUD and does not need an update, The output MD5/SHA1 will be the same if you crypt the same file 2 times in a row, (Doesn't matter if its 1 month or 1 year ago) IF you don't add any random to it. Not saying that his crypter is/isnt shit, But i rechecked it with own crypter and I'm getting the same result when it doesn't have randomizing enabled.

Go ahead and check this yourself, Not saying that the scans are not fake (You can just make a legit .vb file and scan it or w/e), But the MD5/SHA1 thing is bullshit :P

Ill say it again, Not to defend Tom, But you should use correct information when posting a 'Community Alert'

If you re-crypt the same file with a different 'stub' attached to it it will produce a different output every time. Unless you're assuming Tom is keeping the same AV results with no change of 'stub' over a 1 month time period. (I certainly don't believe it)

[UpTheCrust]

Damn, he's always been helpful to me. Just reminds you that you really shouldn't trust anyone in here

[klapriezx]

so many CA's lately I can't understand how can people with 400+ rep do this..

[Armada]

so many CA's lately I can't understand how can people with 400+ rep do this..

Higher the rep = Easier it is to scam and get away with it.
Just plain facts, this is why we had a rash of scammers buying up compromised accounts of high repped members to go ape shit and go on scamming sprees.

[L33T Member]

I boguht his rat forced to +1 him inorder to get prodect didn't even work he ignored me and wouldn't refund or give linux support like claimed to have not the first time he has pull some shit like this.

[JOW]

I mea his reputation has a lot of negatives and claiming he's a scammer yet you still deal with him?