[tim]

https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5907778

This user is paying people $0.5 BTC for reputation aka popularity reputation, but he’s asking people to make contracts?

Isn’t that essentially farming your contract rating and eventuallly could lead to a BIG trust factor or issue possibly? Such small deals and high quantity would be misleading if he ever does a real deal and could end bad for one person.


https://imgur.com/a/JTD5egN

Image Incase thread is edited

[Bear]

A very good point indeed. It could be seen as a loophole, but I am on your side with this.

[Conscious]

Seems totally wrong to be doing imo!
Hope some rules are written about this if there aren't already.

[Crypto]

This really shouldn't be allowed imo.

Could so easily be used to scam people in a later stage...

[Evanescent]

That's abuse of contracts system. It's been warned already in the past.

[Conscious]

That's abuse of contracts system. It's been warned already in the past.

Ty for the clearing that up 🤝

[flavoral]

I had a bit of doubt about that thread too, wasn't even the one to start the contract, it was OP. However, i thought it would've been closed already if it wasn't allowed, I guess It was my fault i should have waited a bit longer. IMO that "deal" doesn't even deserve to B rate it. Also, does that mean that I'm lowkey traped? he can open a DD if i ever decide to change the rep to -3 somewhere in the future? lol

[Enzo Ferrari]

Member should be closed he is definitely planning on something else he wouldn't farm b-rating big scaled like this

[Saltpeter]

It does seem a bit shady, I'd like to see what Omni's stance on stuff like this is.

[Zack Fair]

The guy is buying it for 0,5$ per rep though. A +5 for $2,5 is a lot lol.

Are you kidding me? lol.
That's cheap as fuck, especially for the large amount of scams he can commit if people deem him trusted for having 30+ B-Rating which would only cost him $15...

[Potluck]

Yeah I think they should make it to where you can’t use contracts for reputation people been farming B Ratings since the system came out that’s why even if someone has high rating I wouldn’t use that to deem if I trust the user or not.

[Bear]

The guy is buying it for 0,5$ per rep though. A +5 for $2,5 is a lot lol.

I would say that it's fine if the comment on the "B rating" had to include 2-3 words on what the deal was. So that it's obvious that it's low amount deals.

But now it's just a bunch of "thanks", "amazing seller", etc.

Edit. Ow. :3 What if the "B rating" system looked at the contract and from there decided if it was a low/medium/high deal if amounts are mentioned. When using a contract you have to enter a number in? Never used it, so far.

But anyways, then added it to the B rating as a note on the far right.

Dont you have a deal dispute to settle instead of yapping non sense?

B rating is in place to gauge how a seller is doing in marketplace. If I have 60+ ratings from rep exchanges, do you think thats doing any good to the community?

[Enzo Ferrari]

https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id57880079

He continues farming b-rating.

He's at 15 positive deals now.

[Skepticism]

Lets stay on topic and hope Omni graces us with a commandment of how b ratings are to be marked for amounts or if it can be used for reps and such.

But FYI, heres the open dispute for Maxim: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5790406

Even though that dispute is from January 25, the beginning of this year. I would presume his dispute would be settled by now.

On-topic though, I really hope Omni finds a way to control this or put a limitation on it somehow. I would hate to see anyone else succumb to the deviousness.

[postmaster]

If using contracts for low value transactions is not allowed, then there should be a rule stating so.