[DezFranky]

Can you provide supporting evidence that the defendant's sales thread claims of 78-80% rate is not true?

If you were looking for higher rates, it is assuming because you wanted the rates advertised in the sales thread.

Now you're subverting the question, so it's okay to state methods that aren't in the guide to make a selling point?
Because you guys couldn't fallback on that, so now you're asking me about the rates.
What an absolute travesty, You're asking me why I bought the guide, well no shit I was looking to get better methods of exchanging my amazon for better rates or if there were methods unknown to me that I didn't know about. You're asking for a reason to buy the guide, Are you guys just grasping at straws at this point? What else would someone purchase a guide? Do we need to have a metaphysical explanation?
BTW if you want to be literaly, purse.io offers rates from 49% to 95% so it's not true at all. How that argument pan out "Defendant"

[BTC]

Because you guys couldn't fallback on that, so now you're asking me about the rates.

You were the one to bring up rates. Do not get it twisted.

A guide that exchanges amazon to btc more effectively at higher rates than what I had now.

You speak with no logic, no reason and honestly I think you have some mental health issues. I have no bias on this situation, I originally was mediating and at the beginning of this was siding with you on some points. After all of this, I have come to the conclusion you must be insane or stupid.

Goodbye.

[DezFranky]

You were the one to bring up rates. Do not get it twisted.


You speak with no logic, no reason and honestly I think you have some mental health issues. I have no bias on this situation, I originally was mediating and at the beginning of this was siding with you on some points. After all of this, I have come to the conclusion you must be insane or stupid.

Goodbye.

You're assuming mental health issues then leaving a ragepost and calling it quits.
Really dictates your inner character. Thanks for participating

[Herbert]

so.. from what I can tell, professor got busted for lying about purse.io and reddit and tried to cover it up by introducing another method? there is not much more that needs to be added, if you state in your main thread that it doesn't have anything to do with a certain source, don't. bring. it. up. at. all.
hope you get your money back OP

[Mr.Magnificent]

if you state in your main thread that it doesn't have anything to do with a certain source, don't. bring. it. up. at. all.

I totally agree, no matter if OP is right or wrong, you're lying:

https://imgur.com/GLpko90

It does contain it, so you lied.

[BTC]

I totally agree, no matter if OP is right or wrong, you're lying:

https://imgur.com/GLpko90

It does contain it, so you lied.

The rates being advertised and what people are purchasing for, can not be achieved with purse.io

Only with the other sites, he stated already these were bonuses included in the guide. For the seller to say it does not involve purse.io is a fair statement, given that you can achieve the advertised rates without using purse.io at all.

You guys are forgetting one key factor.

Remove the bonuses "Reddit, Purse, whatever" and you are still left with what the seller advertised to be selling. It is not some sort of requirement to use these in order to achieve what is being sold to the user.

[Mr.Magnificent]

The rates being advertised and what people are purchasing for, can not be achieved with purse.io

Only with the other sites, he stated already these were bonuses included in the guide. For the seller to say it does not involve purse.io is a fair statement, given that you can achieve the advertised rates without using purse.io at all.

You guys are forgetting one key factor.

Remove the bonuses "Reddit, Purse, whatever" and you are still left with what the seller advertised to be selling.

You can see it from 2 sides:

1.: he sells a METHOD
2.: he sells an E-book

I want to change my opinion a bit because he never states it's an E-book. so basically, the method didn't contain the extra purse.io etc.
The PDF did.

To avoid mixups, maybe state it a little bit clearer in the PDF, stating: extra method:purse.io

I agree that buying a method is always risky and you can potentially know everything. I once did a drawing course, they said it was advanced but I already knew everything... They can't see my knowledge and tell me not to do it.

[BTC]

To avoid mixups, maybe state it a little bit clearer in the PDF, stating: extra method:purse.io

Agreed I stated this earlier, perhaps the author of the ebook could have used different terminology. But regardless it was not a scam, and there is more to the guide than using reddit, purse, paxful etc..

The thing is the OP does not stick to his story. He switches back and forth with what his issue is in this dispute. Spanning all the way from him lying, to expecting the method was not related to flipping, and then of course "effectively at higher rates".

Nothing seems to add up, if he did not believe it was worth $50 he should have posted on the sales thread with an honest review, not opening a dispute.

Disputes should be used for scams, not for when you do not like the product. Hell that is why I only shop at stores with refund policies! If the user wanted insurance in case he needed a refund, he could have asked before purchasing and sending money!

[Mr.Magnificent]

Agreed I stated this earlier, perhaps the author of the ebook could have used different terminology. But regardless it was not a scam, and there is more to the guide than using reddit, purse, paxful etc..

I can imagine it being frustrating for OP to pay for something you already know. Can't you work this out together and stay on good terms?

I think this community should work together and not fight about small differences like this. You're not going to solve this by arguing anyways.

[DezFranky]

Thing is already paid $70 to listen to this method I'm going to leave this dispute up as a stain on his reputation. The funny thing is the guy who sold me this method before prosper also got banned on sythe for false advertising. His name was Rothschild I'll his profile when I get home

---

I'm closing the dispute, It's become quite clear with what I'm dealing with on this site and will tread more carefully next time. Thanks to all that participated. I know this site isn't like many other community forums so I won't flame any further.
I will hire a lawyer next time for all my ebook needs, good advice