(Jan 15, 2020 05:53 PM)Evading Wrote: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5819287
Your thread from 2018, could be them pulling another prank.
Time will tell, I'm 50/50 as to whether it's real or fake atm.
Pretty sure it aint.
What I find strange tho.. is the fact that they have a different style of seizing pages everytime.
Sometimes they host the image as a file, and link to it.
Now they've encoded it as base64 and embedded it in-line.
Sometimes they center it, sometimes it covers the full page etc
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
funny if true but looks fake asf to be honest as the actual domain would show it and the crop job is pathetic lol
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jan 15, 2020 05:58 PM)genesiseher Wrote: funny if true but looks fake asf to be honest as the actual domain would show it and the crop job is pathetic lol
not true. do u know how many times actual sites have been raided and the police have only ever had domain or www.domain
working. The amount of times only one worked is insane
Plot twist: This is a media stunt.
Everyone talking about WLI again and media posting news.
Inb4 it'll be up again tomorrow.
(Jan 15, 2020 05:56 PM)✔ Soufian ✔ Wrote: Pretty sure it aint.
What I find strange tho.. is the fact that they have a different style of seizing pages everytime.
Sometimes they host the image as a file, and link to it.
Now they've encoded it as base64 and embedded it in-line.
Sometimes they center it, sometimes it covers the full page etc Yea it just looks off to me.
![[Image: gBY8W5H.png]](https://i.imgur.com/gBY8W5H.png)
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jan 15, 2020 05:59 PM)Pronouncer Wrote: not true. do u know how many times actual sites have been raided and the police have only ever had domain or www.domain
working. The amount of times only one worked is insane
ya could be true was just saying wtf is the image not covering whole page lol. looks like someone got it off shutterstock and tried to cut out the watermarks lol
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jan 15, 2020 06:01 PM)genesiseher Wrote: ya could be true was just saying wtf is the image not covering whole page lol. looks like someone got it off shutterstock and tried to cut out the watermarks lol
thats normal too
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Right now if I had to put money on it, they looked at the IP addresses of their most used users - made sure to include those locations in the block to get attention.
I mean, could be wrong but i've seen a lot of sites go down in the past and this aint it chief.
Could also be they just want out.
What's also strange is the fact that their nameservers are still pointing to cloudflare.
Which means cloudflate gave away the backend. The domain registrar has no way to get the backend ip. So cloudflare could be the one to blame for this.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jan 15, 2020 06:10 PM)✔ Soufian ✔ Wrote: What's also strange is the fact that their nameservers are still pointing to cloudflare.
Which means cloudflate gave away the backend. The domain registrar has no way to get the backend ip. So cloudflare could be the one to blame for this.
Meh no a records
(Jan 15, 2020 06:18 PM)Pronouncer Wrote: Meh no a records
Surely has NS records tho
![[Image: TMERJj3.png]](https://i.imgur.com/TMERJj3.png)
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jan 15, 2020 06:23 PM)✔ Soufian ✔ Wrote: Surely has NS records tho
whatsmydns.com
(Jan 15, 2020 06:24 PM)Pronouncer Wrote: whatsmydns.com
![[Image: 1BgLumK.png]](https://i.imgur.com/1BgLumK.png)
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jan 15, 2020 06:10 PM)✔ Soufian ✔ Wrote: What's also strange is the fact that their nameservers are still pointing to cloudflare.
Which means cloudflate gave away the backend. The domain registrar has no way to get the backend ip. So cloudflare could be the one to blame for this.
if cloudflare is subpeona'd they have no choice but to give up the info they would have as in IP's, registration.
Right now only www. is working, and that one is on Cloudflare as well.
![[Image: spmwunF.png]](https://i.imgur.com/spmwunF.png)
|
