[m8than]

I just don't like bad cheats or scams.  I try to expose them for what they are.  It seems like you might not be a scammer, but your cheat is just actually really bad and probably pasted.

There have been a lot of innovations in CS:GO hacks in the past 3 years, so I don't know how you can claim that your cheat "doesn't need more features" with your sad low amount of features.

If you say you add features, but don't add them on the homepage..........why didn't you add them here either?  If you're advertising a cheat......wouldn't you want to advertise all of the features to attract buyers?  Your excuses and lies are weak.

You also claim you didn't add features because you were focusing on security, but your cheat can't bypass any good anti-cheats........just the bad ones.

I was hoping for a better reply from you honestly, this is just sad.

There mostly just small features like improvements to the aimbot. Stuff like that.

Idk what other features you'd need unless you're talking internal, which this cheat isn't. Feel free to hit me with some examples.

My security's main focus is vac (the build engine took me 3x as long as the cheat) and no it's not pasted lol I know how memory works. The cheat is the easy part. You can try to crack a build if you want.

Adding more features means more detection vectors for vac. I'm not really down to add useless features but if you can think of a useful one feel free to hmu.

[ProGodly]

There mostly just small features like improvements to the aimbot. Stuff like that.

Idk what other features you'd need unless you're talking internal, which this cheat isn't. Feel free to hit me with some examples.

My security's main focus is vac (the build engine took me 3x as long as the cheat) and no it's not pasted lol I know how memory works. The cheat is the easy part.

Adding more features means more detection vectors for vac. I'm not really down to add useless features but if you can think of a useful one feel free to hmu.

Just look at all of the external cheats on unknowncheats with more features than yours, and much better features than yours.

Are you going to add any new features? I wonder if you are even capable.

Anyone would probably be better off using one of the free cs:go external cheats on unknowncheats that have also been vac undetected for years and years.

[m8than]

Just look at all of the external cheats on unknowncheats with more features than yours, and much better features than yours.

Are you going to add any new features?  I wonder if you are even capable.

Anyone would probably be better off using one of the free cs:go external cheats on unknowncheats that have also been vac undetected for years and years.

Just had a quick look at a couple other cheats and the only useful feature I can see is probably bone trigger. This isn't hard to implement lol

Idk why you're firing shots at me for 0 reason. Why add features when I don't need to? There is literally no reason to add these detection vectors to my cheat. Originally it was just soundesp aimbot and trigger but people asked for these extra features so I added them.

I've never really been in this for the money, it's just a cheat that got popular on release and has a small loyal community left so I never left the cheat alone. I care more about what my customers want and that's security. That's the main selling point of the cheat not a million useless features.

If you're talking about things like backtrack this cheat is external. Enough said.

You're ignoring my build engine, my pride and joy and it's killing me man 😭

[ProGodly]

Just had a quick look at a couple other cheats and the only useful feature I can see is probably bone trigger. This isn't hard to implement lol

Idk why you're firing shots at me for 0 reason. Why add features when I don't need to? There is literally no reason to add these detection vectors to my cheat. Originally it was just soundesp aimbot and trigger but people asked for these extra features so I added them.

I've never really been in this for the money, it's just a cheat that got popular on release and has a small loyal community left so I never left the cheat alone. I care more about what my customers want and that's security. That's the main selling point of the cheat not a million useless features.

If you're talking about things like backtrack this cheat is external. Enough said.

Dude, you just keep exposing yourself more and more...there are tons and tons of amazing features that won't add any detection vectors.

Backtrack is possible externally without any detection vectors...and there is source code public for years...

You are a paster that can't even paste features.

My guess is that someone made this for you, and you just update the offsets.

[m8than]

Dude, you just keep exposing yourself more and more...there are tons and tons of amazing features that won't add any detection vectors.

Backtrack is possible externally without any detection vectors...and there is source code public for years...

You are a paster that can't even paste features.

My guess is that someone made this for you, and you just update the offsets.

You clearly don't know what a detection vector is?

Lol more code = more to detect. You do the math.

I actually work commercially with c++ lmao I can code you fucking dumbass.

I actually sent a binary of my cheat to imitator you can ask him what he found if you want...

[ProGodly]

You clearly don't know what a detection vector is?

Lol more code = more to detect. You do the math.

I actually work commercially with c++ lmao I can code you fugging dumbass.

I actually sent a binary of my cheat to imitator you can ask him what he found if you want...

Wouldn't your "unique polymorphic build engine" (lol) protect the code of the new features, or is that just bullshit too?  How do you explain all of the other cheats with more code that are undetected?

If you actually work commercially with C++, prove it and post your github / portfolio / resume with some proof it's you.

I would love to see what imi-tat0r says about your cheat and your replies to me.

[m8than]

Wouldn't your "unique polymorphic build engine" (lol) protect the code of the new features, or is that just bullshit too?  How do you explain all of the other cheats with more code that are undetected?

If you actually work commercially with C++, prove it and post your github / portfolio / resume with some proof it's you.

I would love to see what imitator says about your cheat and your replies to me.

Yeah it's unique, yeah it's polymorphic and yeah it's a build engine (lol). But yeah you can never be 100% sure but every time I think of something new I've updated my build engine to remove that detection vector.

The build engine randomises quite a lot of shit and the cheat itself moves a lot of shit around in the heap idk what to tell you man.

I'm not gonna put my identity out there sorry and believe it or not the company I work for wouldn't like it if I publicly release their code? Idk if you've ever, you know worked in this industry before.

Tbh like I've said before I've not really been interested in cheats for a long time but the build engine is different. It is something I'm interested in. I'm probably gonna write a stand alone version of it soon to sell commercially.

This cheat has never really made much money since the first year but I've kept it running because I've still got some customers, I don't really care about the money (well paying job) and I've still got some interest in aspects of it.

If you think I'm a paster because I haven't had the motivation to add some major features for a couple years then go ahead lmao but I've been in the software engineering/development industry for years with a computer science degree also so think what you wanna think ig lmao

[ProGodly]

Yeah it's unique, yeah it's polymorphic and yeah it's a build engine (lol). But yeah you can never be 100% sure but every time I think of something new I've updated my build engine to remove that detection vector.

The build engine randomises quite a lot of shit and the cheat itself moves a lot of shit around in the heap idk what to tell you man.

I'm not gonna put my identity out there sorry and believe it or not the company I work for wouldn't like it if I publicly release their code? Idk if you've ever, you know worked in this industry before.

Tbh like I've said before I've not really been interested in cheats for a long time but the build engine is different. It is something I'm interested in. I'm probably gonna write a stand alone version of it soon to sell commercially.

This cheat has never really made much money since the first year but I've kept it running because I've still got some customers, I don't really care about the money (well paying job) and I've still got some interest in aspects of it.

If you think I'm a paster because I haven't had the motivation to add some features for a couple years then go ahead lmao but I've been in the software engineering/development industry for years with a computer science degree also so think what you wanna think ig lmao

[m8than]

You're an idiot. There's always a risk. I've made my build engine to minimise that as much as possible.

[ProGodly]

You're an idiot. There's always a risk. I've made my build engine to minimise that as much as possible.

You're actually the idiot here, and you keep proving it with your own mouth.

There isn't always a risk, it depends on many different factors. For example, if someone was using a hardware hack that VAC doesn't even try to detect, they would be completely fine. Another way is to reverse engineer VAC and create a software solution that completely disables it, this has been done numerous times in the past. There are also many more methods to eliminate any risk whatsoever.

You spelled minimize wrong.

---

How did your shady skin gambling site go? Seems like it died pretty fast.

CSGO Gambling - CSCoinFlip.com - HighLimits.net https://highlimits.net/forum/showthread....nextnewest
8 jul. 2017 - I decided to start my own gambling site because I was tired of going onto sites being rigged/scams today I released my CSGO gambling site, ...

[m8than]

You're actually the idiot here, and you keep proving it with your own mouth.

There isn't always a risk, it depends on many different factors.  For example, if someone was using a hardware hack that VAC doesn't even try to detect, they would be completely fine.  Another way is to reverse engineer VAC and create a software solution that completely disables it, this has been done numerous times in the past.  There are also many more methods to eliminate any risk whatsoever.

You spelled minimize wrong.

---

How did your shady skin gambling site go?  Seems like it died pretty fast.

CSGO Gambling - CSCoinFlip.com - HighLimits.net https://highlimits.net/forum/showthread....nextnewest
8 jul. 2017 - I decided to start my own gambling site because I was tired of going onto sites being rigged/scams today I released my CSGO gambling site, ...

Okay and if vac adds a module with idk heuristic scanning which now allows it to detect something it just couldn't detect before?

This clearly isn't a hardware hack now is it and idk what kinda hardware hack you're talking about but it'll still need to read memory via a driver or whatever else so there's still something to detect.

Completely disabling vac seems like a great idea! /s.

Yeah man that's definitely my skin gambling site lmao.

Not replying again you're literally grasping at straws.

Oh and I'm from the UK we spell it with an s lol

[ProGodly]

Okay and if vac adds a module with idk heuristic scanning which now allows it to detect something it just couldn't detect before?

This clearly isn't a hardware hack now is it and idk what kinda hardware hack you're talking about but it'll still need to read memory via a driver or whatever else so there's still something to detect.

Completely disabling vac seems like a great idea! /s.

Yeah man that's definitely my skin gambling site lmao.

Not replying again you're literally grasping at straws.

Oh and I'm from the UK we spell it with an s lol

You're saying a hardware hack NEEDS a SOFTWARE DRIVER??? You really know nothing man. I'm enjoying exposing you.

Why wouldn't disabling VAC, or emulating VAC with a software solution be viable? Can you explain?

You're the only one grasping here, except that you're grasping for my thick throbbing giant cock.

Notice how he completely ignores the fact that I pointed out he ran a shady skin gambling site that failed miserably.

[m8than]

You're saying a hardware hack NEEDS a SOFTWARE DRIVER???  You really know nothing man.  I'm enjoying exposing you.

Why wouldn't disabling VAC, or emulating VAC with a software solution be viable?  Can you explain?

You're the only one grasping here, except that you're grasping for my thick throbbing giant cock.

Notice how he completely ignores the fact that I pointed out he ran a shady skin gambling site that failed miserably.

How the fuck do you think a hardware hack gets access to memory?

You got some kinda ram proxy hack or something?

Yes it's a very good idea to go full blatantly retardedly obvious that you are messing with the system rather than to go with a more stealthy approach.

I didn't skip the cs gambling site I literally said I didn't run it but sure.

---

To reiterate with the hardware cheat thing every single piece of hardware interacts with your operating system with you guessed it! A driver.

Hardware hacks access memory through this driver. You don't know shit mr know it all lmao

[ProGodly]

---

How the fugg do you think a hardware hack gets access to memory?

You got some kinda ram proxy hack or something?

Yes it's a very good idea to go full blatantly retardedly obvious that you are messing with the system rather than to go with a more stealthy approach.

I didn't skip the cs gambling site I literally said I didn't run it but sure.

---

To reiterate with the hardware cheat thing every single piece of hardware interacts with your operating system with you guessed it! A driver.

Hardware hacks access memory through this driver.  You don't know shit mr know it all lmao

It's called direct memory access, look it up my student. You might learn something.....actually I'll just leave this here:

PCILeech Summary:
PCILeech uses PCIe hardware devices to read and write target system memory. This is achieved by using DMA over PCIe. No drivers are needed on the target system.

"ram proxy hack" Do you just make up stuff as you go?

All of the methods I talked about are more stealthy and safer than your product is.

Sorry about the skin gambling accusation, but can you prove that the site wasn't yours?

[m8than]

---

It's called direct memory access, look it up my student.  You might learn something.....Actually I'll just leave this here:

PCILeech Summary:
PCILeech uses PCIe hardware devices to read and write target system memory. This is achieved by using DMA over PCIe. No drivers are needed on the target system.

"ram proxy hack"  Do you just make up stuff as you go?

All of the methods I talked about are more stealthy and safer than your product is.

Sorry about the skin gambling accusation, but can you prove that the site wasn't yours?

Okay and tell me now where exactly you write code to perform DMA. Absolute retard lmao

Yes disabling vac altogether is definitely a stealthy method.

Idk how to prove to u I never started a csgo skin site some random dude posted on my forum lmao but if u look that guy has a bunch of posts and I don't think I would have called myself dabears tbh


Oh and about pcileech

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows...hunderbolt