[Golden Complex]

I bought the service 9 hours ago, I'm still waiting for your answer and for you to send me the guide and activate me in discord

You were activated earlier! I responded to your ticket.

[Telstra]

As my two week vouch copy is coming to an end soon, I am going to leave my vouch now. In my two weeks of being in Apex Sports Betting, we have had (in parlay bets) 6 wins, and 3 losses. Now, that is actually 23 individual games, with 20 wins and only 3 losses. We are currently on a 5 Parlay win streak going strong! I would not be hesitant to recommend this service to anybody. I do plan to renew my membership once my vouch copy has officially ended, and I plan on using some of my profits from the service. As long as you have a nice balance to play with, and use Risk Management (which the Discord is there to help you on that part) you will be fine. Bet smart, not dumb! There is absolutely no way you will not come out with nice profits if you follow simple advice from the staff. I have enjoyed my time with Apex, and another thing that I find unique, this isn't a group if you want ten bets a day. We have maybe a few Parlay bets a week, you see other services providing countless bets a day, but that's also why they don't have the win percentage that Apex does have. My first day in Apex, the main analyst (tipper) said a quote that I have always went by,  "It's about quality not quantity". and I think Apex's win percentage speaks for itself when that saying is brought up. Apex focuses on quality bets, not quantity. Thank you again for the vouch copy @OP. It's been fun, and I can't wait to see what the future brings!

Is a parlay like a multibet? Like all 3 games have to win?

[nectar]

Is a parlay like a multibet? Like all 3 games have to win?

Correct, so he usualtl sends out the bets in parlay form, so if one event loses, than you are done. However, I don’t see what’s stopping you from placing them individually, the odds he gives out might be different though.

[Golden Complex]

Correct, so he usualtl sends out the bets in parlay form, so if one event loses, than you are done. However, I don’t see what’s stopping you from placing them individually, the odds he gives out might be different though.

Thank you!

[reefli]

I cannot recommend this service enough!

Accurate tips and great customer support. Prioritizes quality of bets over quantity thats why the win rate is above 80% unlike many other providers i tried and was at a loss most of the time.

Looking forward for more bets $$$

[IJVG]

I just joined the group last night. Apparently we are suffering some loss streaks and miscommunication. Will post a detailed review in a week with either some loss porn or gains.

As it stands right now: I am on the fence, my bookie does not allow for these types of parlays so I personally cannot benefit from them.

Will check back with detailed review in a week.

I dedicated $1,000 to this group to try out the tips.
So far 2 bets from the last 2 days have both failed. (I think the current losing streak is around 3-5 in a row)
-$90 for an account total of $910

I also have dedicated a control group $1,000 of personal picks I will be following my guy and knowledge.
Im up around $280
+280 for an account total of $1,280

The explanation for us losing is that it all averages out statistically wise, which I agree with. We could easily be in the 20% losses they claim to have. However, tons of people in the discord are getting pissed and fed up with losing. I do not blame the members or the analyst, just waiting to see the wins come in. Most of these are really big parlays, so a few wins and you are back up.

[JuiceBoxCereal]

I just joined the group last night. Apparently we are suffering some loss streaks and miscommunication. Will post a detailed review in a week with either some loss porn or gains.

As it stands right now: I am on the fence, my bookie does not allow for these types of parlays so I personally cannot benefit from them.

Will check back with detailed review in a week.

Waiting to hear back from you.

[Golden Complex]

I just joined the group last night. Apparently we are suffering some loss streaks and miscommunication. Will post a detailed review in a week with either some loss porn or gains.

As it stands right now: I am on the fence, my bookie does not allow for these types of parlays so I personally cannot benefit from them.

Will check back with detailed review in a week.

We've had a bad week, there's no denying that. However it's important to keep in mind that these losses occurred after coming off of a five win streak.

Returns from this are meant to be measured in the long term. We have six months of history with our main analyst, showing very strong statistics:





And then this week we were negative. The miscommunication you write about I believe is regarding the misconception that our analyst recommended Martingale (Which he did not, but it could have been interpreted that way) and the misconception of which games he was actually tipping.

Our priority is quality over quantity, as is written on the OP. This means that we may not produce a huge amount of tips as we want to focus only on the best ones. Because of this, several users expressed the desire for higher frequency of tips. To satisfy this, our main analyst started posting additional predictions with the main picks so that if users wished to, they could bet on extra predictions even though they were less likely to hit. The first prediction that our analyst was posting each day was the main one, and any additional predictions were just meant for those who wanted the higher volume. Several users failed to realize this and simply bet money on every single prediction that came through instead of just betting on the recommended one.

In reality, this week would have been much better had users only bet on the primary predictions as recommended by us. To be fair, we did not do a good job at disclosing these changes to everybody. We should have made an announcement, and that's my fault. Every time a set of predictions are given out, the recommended one will be clearly labeled from here on out.

Regardless, the solution is the same. Continue betting on the predictions as Joker (our analyst) has proven himself over a long period of time and his predictions are always of solid quality when measured over the long term. I don't think it's fair to take one week of data as indicative of the quality of the group when we have six months of hardcore success documented.

Consider checking out our recommended bookies channel for a bookie that fits your needs. I'm excited to hear about your experience in the near future. 🙂

[Favorit]

We've had a bad week, there's no denying that.  However it's important to keep in mind that these losses occurred after coming off of a five win streak.

Returns from this are meant to be measured in the long term.  We have six months of history with our main analyst, showing very strong statistics:





And then this week we were negative.  The miscommunication you write about I believe is regarding the misconception that our analyst recommended Martingale (Which he did not, but it could have been interpreted that way) and the misconception of which games he was actually tipping.

Our priority is quality over quantity, as is written on the OP.  This means that we may not produce a huge amount of tips as we want to focus only on the best ones.  Because of this, several users expressed the desire for higher frequency of tips.  To satisfy this, our main analyst started posting additional predictions with the main picks so that if users wished to, they could bet on extra predictions even though they were less likely to hit.  The first prediction that our analyst was posting each day was the main one, and any additional predictions were just meant for those who wanted the higher volume.  Several users failed to realize this and simply bet money on every single prediction that came through instead of just betting on the recommended one.

In reality, this week would have been much better had users only bet on the primary predictions as recommended by us.  To be fair, we did not do a good job at disclosing these changes to everybody.  We should have made an announcement, and that's my fault.  Every time a set of predictions are given out, the recommended one will be clearly labeled from here on out.

Regardless, the solution is the same.  Continue betting on the predictions as Joker (our analyst) has proven himself over a long period of time and his predictions are always of solid quality when measured over the long term.  I don't think it's fair to take one week of data as indicative of the quality of the group when we have six months of hardcore success documented. 

Consider checking out our recommended bookies channel for a bookie that fits your needs.  I'm excited to hear about your experience in the near future.  🙂

If your predictor's performance is lacking will you dismiss him from his role and find a better one for his replacement?

is there any clear distinction between his recommended bets versus risky ones in his announcement?

[Golden Complex]

If your predictor's performance is lacking will you dismiss him from his role and find a better one for his replacement?

is there any clear distinction between his recommended bets versus risky ones in his announcement?

Our predictor's performance is fine. It's been measured over six months. A week that dips below the usual performance is not grounds to let go of somebody who has proven themselves as incredible tipsters over half a year.

Yes, the recommended one will be outlined as "Recommended"

If we had any reason to believe that performance will be bad for a long time, we would find a better analyst immediately. The issue is that there are very few if any analysts as good as the one we currently have.

[pepsicol1996]

I've bought your service, opened a ticket already

[Vlad Pop]

Sorry to say it but no tipster has 85% win-ratio. If someone is claiming this - he is a scammer obviously. Also those spreadsheets don't mean anything, you can always edit them. Please explore this business more and than start offering. It's lame you are trying to scam kids for $35.

[Golden Complex]

Sorry to say it but no tipster has 85% win-ratio. If someone is claiming this - he is a scammer obviously. Also those spreadsheets don't mean anything, you can always edit them. Please explore this business more and than start offering. It's lame you are trying to scam kids for $35.

This is true when it comes to standard tipsters. We spent a very long time finding and trialing the head analyst we have now.

He truly is exceptional. I think our reviews speak volumes.

[Vlad Pop]

This is true when it comes to standard tipsters.  We spent a very long time finding and trialing the head analyst we have now. 

He truly is exceptional.  I think our reviews speak volumes.

You understand that with 85% win-ratio you'd be at least multi millionaire by now if you were betting cash on your tips. And on the other side why would you not bet cash if you are so good.

Please check the 85% win-ratio thing from your thread. Misleading people for 35 bucks is lame.

[Favorit]

This is true when it comes to standard tipsters.  We spent a very long time finding and trialing the head analyst we have now. 

He truly is exceptional.  I think our reviews speak volumes.

how is the current performance of your analyst? What were the latest results?