Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

An other subforum for CONFIRMED working eBooks!

I think that having a sub-forum for confirmed working eBooks would be great.

Why? Just look at my other thread and read other people's opinion.
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=1642298

Something simple but efficient like, all reviewed eBooks with a good score and proven to works should go there so like that people would be able to know which eBook is fake and which is working.

"Yea but dude you just need to look if there's a lot of vouch that's it."
People just go on MSN, ask for people to vouch in exchange of a copy of the guide or some small rewards. So vouch = fucking bullshit.
--
The section would be dead, as no ebooks on here work.

Just sayin'
(Aug 25, 2011 04:59 PM)Skyro Wrote:  The section would be dead, as no ebooks on here work.

Just sayin'

Hahah I agree but theres some ebooks out there that do actually work.
It would be a waste of DB queries. I don't think this is needed.
(Aug 25, 2011 04:59 PM)Skyro Wrote:  The section would be dead, as no ebooks on here work.

Just sayin'

About 96% of the eBooks on Hack Forums aren't working.
About 80% of them are posted with a different name.
--
No. Because methods of getting certain things or methods of making money will be saturated.
OP:

This won't ever happen. Too much work to set up a subforum for just
that. (Or at the very least, when Omni needs to set one up, it takes a while).
Moreover practically none of the ebooks work, if you're looking for get rick quick
schemes.

-Viral.
My HF addresses only.:
BTC: 1PB7ijSjz2HYudBSr4VamEPz1TqrAYwJE
ETH: 0x6aFf82dAb5E8F158D74BcaD81d7d90CD468dED10
Terrible idea, would be a lot of work to sort the books and people would get butthurt if theirs didn't get in
"The state calls its own violence `law', but that of the individual `crime'"
~Max Stirner

If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand.
~Milton Friedman
(Aug 25, 2011 05:32 PM)Viral Dragon Wrote:  OP:

This won't ever happen. Too much work to set up a subforum for just
that. (Or at the very least, when Omni needs to set one up, it takes a while).
Moreover practically none of the ebooks work, if you're looking for get rick quick
schemes.

-Viral.

It's impossible to get rich fast, people that buys eBook to do so are noobs that completely doesn't understand crap about business.

It's simple, we only need to have a sub forum, have the Reviewers make the reviews and approved the working ones.

(Aug 25, 2011 05:33 PM)Monstah Wrote:  Terrible idea, would be a lot of work to sort the books and people would get butthurt if theirs didn't get in

A lot of people get butthurt because of not getting Ub3r, getting into groups, staff position, group leader etc.
There will always be people butthurt.
What is your point?
--
Reviewers job aren't to test the ebooks.

Just to review the possibility of it working.
Nick Fuentes: “we need a dictatorship” to “force the people to believe what we believe or play by our rules”

Not Your Keys Not Your Crypto
(Aug 25, 2011 06:28 PM)Itachi Uchiha Wrote:  Reviewers job aren't to test the ebooks.

Just to review the possibility of it working.

Anyone can use common sens and think about the possibility of it that could work 😑...
--
But there are so many ebooks to test lol, Moderators would have a full time job.
(Aug 25, 2011 06:28 PM)Itachi Uchiha Wrote:  Reviewers job aren't to test the ebooks.

Just to review the possibility of it working.

And after buying several eBooks here, and disagreeing with the review 95% of the time, I can tell that Reviewers do a horrible job at that.
This doesn't really make sense - the reviewers are not given the job of justifying whether or not something "works", their job is to review the elements of the eBook to make sure that it is of quality. Correct me if i'm wrong, but their sole job is JUST not to verify that monetizing methods work effectively.

I think you're on to something here but IMO making a new sub-forum for so-called "verified methods" or something like that just doesn't seem like the most effective way to go about things. I personally think some kind of system being implemented in order to stress reviews is a good idea, but i'm not completely sold on this specific one.
I agree, 100%; This needs to be implemented. It shouldn't be "too much work", as that is the excuse for pretty much EVERY fucking suggestion I've seen get denied. The Reviewers group, try to help you out, but even then, they're only doing half their job; A Reviewer should be willing to thoroughly review someones product, by all means, I'm not disrespecting their work, but it needs to be done with more care and time. You're not going to go out and rush a review for E-Reputation; No. That's wrong. On the other hand, a Reviewer should actually review someones E-Book or whatever other product it is. Reviewing isn't writing down your small, half-witted opinion about how the thread looks, it's about getting a copy of the E-Book, reading it, THEN posting your review on it, as that is the only way you can review something. You don't just see Books being published randomly, do you? They have to be looked at thoroughly before being published, for mistakes, errors, and other sorts of things, especially if they are for making a profit in life.

tl;dr lrn2review


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
by InvisibleZeusApr 1, 2019 11:37 AM 2 155 Apr 1, 2019 11:37 AM
Last Post: Eagle 95