Dec 4, 2011 06:57 PM
(This post was last modified: Dec 5, 2011 10:17 AM by Mr. Anderson.)
Expect this out soon. The stub is 95% unique. Its not TRUE polymorphism, but its as close as you can get with .NET.
There is also an option to "recompile" the stub on runtime, which reassembles the code itself every-time the stub is run, so it will mutate on every run if the customer wants it to. This is a unique features that no other crypter has(to the best of my knowledge). So basically you will have mutating stub every time you run it. I'm not going to share how I do this, as its a private method I developed. Its been tested on Windows 7/Vista, on 32 bit and 64 bit operating systems, I'm also working on it for XP as well.
If anyone has any feedback or features they want added(that are not already there), then please post them. Your can see the features I have in the screenshots.
Any trolling or bashing of the .NET framework here will be reported, so don't start flaming.
Stub scan:
http://www.prodef.net/report.php?id=dfs1...p5xztth7ss
[img]http://www.dropmocks.com/ilTLS[/img]
[img]http://www.dropmocks.com/ilKYM[/img]
[img]http://www.dropmocks.com/ilUsD[/img]
[img]http://www.dropmocks.com/ilUsJ[/img]
[img]http://www.dropmocks.com/ilLlA[/img]
[img]http://www.dropmocks.com/ilTyV[/img]
If it's not "TRUE" polymorphism, why did you call it polymorphic?
still lurkin. still bitcoin cashin.
(Dec 4, 2011 07:12 PM)Orgy Wrote: If it's not "TRUE" polymorphism, why did you call it polymorphic?
Because its still polymorphic. Its just not 100% polymorphic.
look nice you might have to post screen shot of file comparing
(Dec 4, 2011 07:14 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: Because its still polymorphic. Its just not 100% polymorphic.
oh okay. i have enough to buy this. not the TRUE amount, though. its not 100% enough.
is that ok?
still lurkin. still bitcoin cashin.
inb4 codedom with string encryption
1st. Looks like copy and paste because the theme is obviously copy and pasted
2nd. Polymorphic kills the sales unless you're using it for market strategies
Dec 4, 2011 10:50 PM
(This post was last modified: Dec 4, 2011 10:51 PM by pr0t0typ3.)
(Dec 4, 2011 07:14 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: Because its still polymorphic. Its just not 100% polymorphic. Is your girlfriend pregnant ? Yes or No are the only answers you can give to that, exactly like in this situation. There is nothing like 90 % pregnant as well as there is nothing like 90 % polymorphic.
In my opinion: Lying about Polymorphic, What else are you lying about?
Looks pretty decent. Vouch for an old friend when this opens ;).
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
HF marketplace, where the dreams of coders (or maybe copy-pasters?) go to die.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
It says it has that option to 'generate' a new stub at every run, at least he tried to do something new (not to hard to do it with .NET), won't help him to keep it undetected but sounds nice to see that running.
I would like to see and test that kind of crypted binary.
At form load
File = file.replace("%bluh%", GenerateRandomChar)
GenerateCode(my.resources.source, "new")
System.Process("new.exe")
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Dam man, you are taking a lot of hate.... Oh well, just keep working on it and ignore people. Probably should just junk this and just say "%95 unique output" nextime. 🤝
(Dec 5, 2011 01:28 AM)ToXiiC Wrote: Dam man, you are taking a lot of hate.... Oh well, just keep working on it and ignore people. Probably should just junk this and just say "%95 unique output" nextime. 🤝 Exactly my suggestion. Keep the fucking Polymorphic Attribute away, as most people do not even know what it means so it will not help you with getting sales and people who know what they are talking about will flame a lot.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Dec 5, 2011 06:17 AM
(This post was last modified: Dec 5, 2011 07:33 AM by ⚖️ Lollipop ⚖️.)
For some reason, when I saw the word polymorphic I knew what was going to happen.
|
