Title says it all, I'm just curious because I seems like it haha
Do .NET Crypters have longer FUD time than VB6/ASM crypters? |
|
I seem to think so.
My theory is people who still use vb are fairly oldschool. oldschool programmers are usually all about the open source and sharing. nowadays so many kids copy and paste codes, modify a few lines, and keep it to themselves or use fileic3. can't coment on ASM but i would assume it actually would stay fud longer as less people are capable of programming it, and the people that can are usually smart enough to prevent to prevent it from being detected too early.
That thread may generates many different replies but the simple answer is NO and actually i agree totally with ∂4ґкღ4ᾔ™.
(Sep 27, 2015 09:47 AM)josporter22 Wrote: I think the same too but ill make my conclusions. Stop bumping threads. It is against the rules and you will be simply banned. (Apr 26, 2016 04:33 PM)hcrew2 Wrote: Please i need to know the best crypter for cryting botnet, i need FUDNice grave dig ! Create your own thread. (Apr 26, 2016 04:33 PM)hcrew2 Wrote: Please i need to know the best crypter for cryting botnet, i need FUD you can go and look into the crypter reviews in place of grave digging.
Apr 27, 2016 03:43 AM
(This post was last modified: Apr 27, 2016 03:43 AM by Bull™.)
Its depend on the Coder and Depend on your spreading method. like if you using exploit for spread then it can be detected soon does not matter what crypter are you using and its coded in what language.
I need a crypter that works with nano rat and where I can get a PERSONAL stub. Of course I'll pay extra for that. I need to know how much it will cost and if it's 100% fud with all AV's and how long it lasts
Please PM me, don't reply to thread as I'm not following the thread or contact me at jabber @ [email protected] |
|
|



![[Image: wllu8A6.png]](https://i.imgur.com/wllu8A6.png)

![[Image: RV5fO.png]](https://i.imgur.com/RV5fO.png)
![[Image: 6xBycLk.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/6xBycLk.gif)