[Prince of Persia]

I guess like everyone knows about this old crypter, pictures:

Client:
[img]http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/1163/clienthu.png[/img]

USG:
[img]http://img593.imageshack.us/img593/5246/usgn.png[/img]

Why this shit is called 'the legend' ?
+maybe because it was the first crypter with usg, i've invented it.
+maybe because kaspersky wanted to buy the source of it
+maybe because it has many unique options.
+maybe because it was fud up to one month.

"Yeah, right. Give me a break with your kid tools"

@Kaspersky Now you can analyze this source, you don't need to pay for it )

Download:
http://up.ht/IZcHop

BUNNN released this on another site and I am re-posting as I find this pretty interesting for him to release for free. All credits go to BUNNN.

https://hackforums.net/member.php?action...&uid=53773

[Kenny252]

Holy crap... that is a lot of features T_T

[( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)]

Very nice share, thanks for this (and thank BUNNN too). :)

[(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━━┻]

Thanks for the share man. I won't use it but thanks.

[Burn™]

Thanks man <3
Looks sweet ;D
Awesome!

[Kenny252]

Wait, isn't this an obfuscator not a crypter?

[Deceptive]

Wait, isn't this an obfuscator not a crypter?

Nah' it's a really old crypter that used to be as popular as Galaxy Crypter.

[Αndromeda]

I wonder in how much money Kaspersky wanted to buy this in..

[1337B345T3R]

Nice share bro. I might check it out a bit later.

[BUNNN]

@Ruzzle 3k euro.
But i refused it because of my active customers and many other things ..

[Penthos]

@Ruzzle 3k euro.
But i refused it because of my active customers and many other things ..

Well Kudos to you for not giving in to them :D even tho the price was nice :D

[Antidote]

Thanks for the release, this crypter looks pretty impressive. Did Kaspersky really offer money for the source code?

[DeathStar13]

Nice site man, very good download.. thx

[moordact]

sweet , is it possible to make it fud again?

or is it a lost case?

[kprof]

sweet , is it possible to make it fud again?

or is it a lost case?

you can try to edit source, but what i read on other site, it is more than 70% scrambled...