Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

C# 

[FUD][SRC]Segma Runtime Crypter[SRC][FUD]

Hi HF Today i've coded my first C# Program a RunTime Crypter i named it:
Segma Crypter

Pic of The Crypter:
[img]http://www7.0zz0.com/2012/05/29/20/403304355.png[/img]


Features :
1- Native Execuatbles Crypting(Managed Apps Not Supported)
2-RunPE Calling By Reflection Method
3-Semi FUD Result : http://www.chk4me.com/check/public/XN67s...D2krmeog6f
4-Resource Mode Data Saving
5-Managed Rijndael Encryption

Now Source Download Link : Content deleted to prevent possible harm to our members. -Staff

i hope you learn something from my small work 🙂
1- Native Execuatbles Crypting(Managed Apps Not Supported)
2-RunPE Calling By Reflection Method
3-Semi FUD Result : http://www.chk4me.com/check/public/XN67s...D2krmeog6f
4-Resource Mode Data Saving
5-Managed Rijndael Encryption

WTF?

Contradictions;
1- Native Execuatbles Crypting(Managed Apps Not Supported)
2-RunPE Calling By Reflection Method

It's either FUD or it is not.

Your either not nativly english or you know fuck all about this.
(May 29, 2012 02:55 PM)Support. Wrote:  1- Native Execuatbles Crypting(Managed Apps Not Supported)
2-RunPE Calling By Reflection Method
3-Semi FUD Result : http://www.chk4me.com/check/public/XN67s...D2krmeog6f
4-Resource Mode Data Saving
5-Managed Rijndael Encryption

WTF?

Contradictions;
1- Native Execuatbles Crypting(Managed Apps Not Supported)
2-RunPE Calling By Reflection Method

It's either FUD or it is not.

Your either not nativly english or you know fuck all about this.

The only contradiction he made was 'semi-fud' ( i suspect because he does not speak english well ) also, semi-fully undetected means it is only slightly fully detected.

RunPE calling by reflection means he made a c# dll that is encrypted. It is then decrypted and called via Assembly Load.

Native executables crypting means it only crypts crypters without .NET.

Please show some respect and if you want to call someone out and make them look stupid.. make sure you know your facts or it will backfire on you!

Good day sir
(May 29, 2012 02:58 PM)Feminist Wrote:  The only contradiction he made was 'semi-fud' ( i suspect because he does not speak english well ) also, semi-fully undetected means it is only slightly fully detected.

RunPE calling by reflection means he made a c# dll that is encrypted. It is then decrypted and called via Assembly Load.

Native executables crypting means it only crypts crypters without .NET.

Please show some respect and if you want to call someone out and make them look stupid.. make sure you know your facts or it will backfire on you!

Good day sir

I wish we could "like" or "rep" posts on HF.
(May 29, 2012 02:58 PM)Feminist Wrote:  The only contradiction he made was 'semi-fud' ( i suspect because he does not speak english well ) also, semi-fully undetected means it is only slightly fully detected.

RunPE calling by reflection means he made a c# dll that is encrypted. It is then decrypted and called via Assembly Load.

Native executables crypting means it only crypts crypters without .NET.

Please show some respect and if you want to call someone out and make them look stupid.. make sure you know your facts or it will backfire on you!

Good day sir

I didn't intend for it to sound so harsh, hence why I said not nativly english, and I apoligise for that.

But FUD is FUD & UD or CD (Completly) are the only ways you can class crypters. Saying semi-FUD is like saying blue is pretty much green.

& "Native Execuatbles Crypting" tells me this would crypt delphi, C++ (without .net) & so on,

But, either way I do apoligize for sounding so harsh OP, I did not mean to come across like that. I did want to say well done, very good for a first app especially with it being a crypter but I thought I'd wait for an answer to see 'IF' we saw the usual skid comments we often see & many of us have now come to expect.
Native indeed would mean apps made from c++, delphi, vb6, asm, c, etc
Thank you very much, this is awesome ! :)
Infected file
thats my first time my AV geting Detected SRC as virus
add AV scan ..
It is because it is a crypter. I dont think it is really infected. However I have not downloaded so i am not sure
Fuck you motherfucker, dont open its fake and if you open it will not start
Smoke crack and fly, Don't smoke weed and die
its working tried on vb6 app and its a source you can scan it :)


what is the matter with you people its working like a charm tested on vb6 RAT Server
its Fully UnDetected By Avir Even after the crypting her is thec check : http://www.chk4me.com/check/public/f3xqE...s9Ll1_F1kM so dont flame up this thread !
(May 30, 2012 12:58 AM)simon-benyo Wrote:  its working tried on vb6 app and its a source you can scan it :)


what is the matter with you people its working like a charm tested on vb6 RAT Serve

its Fully UnDetected By Avir Even after the crypting her is thec check : http://www.chk4me.com/check/public/f3xqE...s9Ll1_F1kM so dont flame up this thread !

Ffs. FUD means 0/43 or more! This is not FUD! This has already been explained!

Example;
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=2338519
https://www.virustotal.com/file/0a8d0995...332730168/
https://www.virustotal.com/file/1120632b...332501202/

Edit: & with your scan result being different from the original, this obv. means AV's can read you payload & will reslut in this being like 20/44 as soon as some one used it seriously.
it is just simple source of a crypter and its my first source in c# so calm down i started this thread so people can learn even 1% not the bring FUD FUD FUD this is for learning if someone wants not to learn and just fud the market is always open ! and thank you for posting in my thread :)


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
[Java] by ghostman010May 5, 2016 12:15 PM 8 393 May 5, 2016 12:15 PM
Last Post: Jire
[C] by YourDigitalJan 1, 2016 12:00 PM 11 967 Jan 1, 2016 12:00 PM
Last Post: YourDigital
[C#] by CaptainBriDec 15, 2015 04:16 PM 23 4,197 Dec 15, 2015 04:16 PM
Last Post: ChewedGummie