Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

Announcing polymorphic crypter - snowflake

I'd like to announce a new polymorphic crypter that will be
available in a few weeks to trusted people here.

This poly engine is a result of hard work that's been done over last few months of researching and programming.
I want to state that this isn't just a polymorphic crypter, it's a basically crypter that uses my poly engine for generating decryptors which appear differently every time.
Poly engine, itself, can be used in any other project such as worms, viruses, shellcodes, whatever, it's totally PIC (position independent code).

It uses different crypting functions with random key every time, and it's bidirectional (decrypts file in two directions).

It's coded in C, can be compiled with any C compiler (msvc, borland cpp,
pelles C, mingw). And yes, it's x86 poly also.

It doesn't use runPE methods, or any injection, so it will work with files that have .reloc section (msvc compiled files are best).

Any suggestions, advices, questions are welcome.

ICQ: 634937859
MSN: [email protected]
Skype: vx.cinik
Quote:It doesn't use runPE methods, or any injection, so it will work with files that have .reloc section (msvc compiled files are best).


So...How do you bypass security software on runtime? Got a priv8 method?
Vouch for the OP on this one. I'm so proud. 😭
Why do I have a feeling this will fail?
(Aug 10, 2012 11:10 AM)¤ Nick™ ¤ Wrote:  Vouch for the OP on this one. I'm so proud. 😭

Thank you babe. I told ya I was gonna make it :P.
(Aug 10, 2012 11:11 AM)Pineapple Wrote:  Why do I have a feeling this will fail?

Because this is HackForums, the land of attention-whores and skids.
(Aug 10, 2012 11:11 AM)Pineapple Wrote:  Why do I have a feeling this will fail?

And why would it fail. According to my last few tests, it's working very well. The crypted files are not recognised by any AV so far.
I am planning to add other things as well but at this very moment
I don't have to do anything because it's FUD already.
It does work by re-basing the original PE?
Well, I've seen crypters injecting into other files, etc. I want to make a distinction, my crypter won't do any injecting/spreading, relocable files will be loaded on heap with fixed imports, resources, whatever and run there.

As simple as that.
wat i tought polymorphic crypt onli possible to make in .net???

u cheatin
For once there is something interesting on this forum and what does the author get from it: flame party. Great! -.-
(Aug 10, 2012 11:40 AM)cinik Wrote:  Well, I've seen crypters injecting into other files, etc. I want to make a distinction, my crypter won't do any injecting/spreading, relocable files will be loaded on heap with fixed imports, resources, whatever and run there.

As simple as that.
Nice. Shouldn't add bunch of garbage like rest of the cryptors here.
Don't add spreaders and all that crap.
Should add antis though. Self coded working ones. 👍
(Aug 10, 2012 11:09 AM)Lil Shiot Wrote:  So...How do you bypass security software on runtime? Got a priv8 method?

RunPE is more suspicious than not injecting
(Aug 12, 2012 05:15 AM)janceym Wrote:  RunPE is more suspicious than not injecting

If you're talking about injecting another process then no, unless you've got a good method injecting is way more detected.


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
by VigilanteMay 10, 2013 12:55 AM 18 708 May 10, 2013 12:55 AM
Last Post: HardCoreSmasher
by Jack591Nov 9, 2012 05:38 PM 19 612 Nov 9, 2012 05:38 PM
Last Post: Modesty
by Maple ‎‎Oct 21, 2012 12:59 PM 23 593 Oct 21, 2012 12:59 PM
Last Post: Maple ‎‎