[Cytoplasm]

Looking for some IRC Bot Sources, doesn't matter what bot it is.
Vanadium would be nice, or nGR

There used to be a 300+ bot source download, but unfortunately that link is down :(
^ if anyone has the 300 that would be awesome...


Please help me out!
Thanks,



Cytoplasm

[Brosephz]

Both dogshit bots, why can't you just spend a little money on one, they're still pretty shit but better than anything you'll receive for nothing by far.

[Cytoplasm]

Link to a premium irc bot source? An up to date one plx

[Brosephz]

Barracuda / Insomnia
The only two I know of on here because IRC bots are pretty shit and it's not 2008.

[tux1]

Even though most of the open source irc bots are old, they are still work and are a lot better than the .NET shit you get around here.

@ the comment above: I don't know why you would say barracuda or insomnia. Barracuda is a piece of shit, it's easy to remove and the panel is easily hacked. I heard that the owner is also a scammer and has stopped supporting it. Insomnia is coded in c# so you need the .NET framework to run it, there's no injection and it's also incredibly easy to decompile.

[Energon]

I have IRC bot Source code ,
but its priv8 :/

[Panoptic]

Even though most of the open source irc bots are old, they are still work and are a lot better than the .NET shit you get around here.

@ the comment above: I don't know why you would say barracuda or insomnia. Barracuda is a piece of shit, it's easy to remove and the panel is easily hacked. I heard that the owner is also a scammer and has stopped supporting it. Insomnia is coded in c# so you need the .NET framework to run it, there's no injection and it's also incredibly easy to decompile.

True, even most oldish IRC bases are better than almost all C# malware on HF. @OP Just find an Aspergillus base and mod it to your liking, it is simple but a good and stable base to work with.

[Brosephz]

Even though most of the open source irc bots are old, they are still work and are a lot better than the .NET shit you get around here.

@ the comment above: I don't know why you would say barracuda or insomnia. Barracuda is a piece of shit, it's easy to remove and the panel is easily hacked. I heard that the owner is also a scammer and has stopped supporting it. Insomnia is coded in c# so you need the .NET framework to run it, there's no injection and it's also incredibly easy to decompile.

You misunderstood the ENTIRE concept of my original post. 😠

But on that subject.. so what if it's .Net? Insomnia is a stable ass bot and worth that money all day long, the issue is finding a good C# crypt.

[Cytoplasm]

Damnit.. I just need an IRC Source.
Please jesus someone just post a DL link ><
^Safe ofc.

[Panoptic]

Just search Google for a fucking "Aspergillus IRC bot base". It's a public and well known base. Learn to find things yourself instead of having them spoonfed to you.

@Cryp1c I wouldn't say that Insomnia is a stable ass bot, as tux said there is no injection and it is just a very simple bot with no features that make it wort the money.

[Fernandez]

But on that subject.. so what if it's .Net? Insomnia is a stable ass bot and worth that money all day long, the issue is finding a good C# crypt.

Goddamn you are retarded.

.NET should not be used in malware coding. Why? Because there's a HUGE compatibility issue with both .NET malware and crypters. It's hard to estimate how much % of the worlds computers have any version of .NET installed, and even harder which ones have the latest. .NET Framework is not installed by default on any Windows version, so the real numbers will be low. It's discouraged be used for any software development that is distributed to other people. Please get this into your stupid HF skiddy head.

And if you have a .NET executable, you don't need to use a C# or .NET crypter provided the bot/exe is coded properly.

[Panoptic]

Fernandez is right, non-dependancy crypters are compatible with .net malware, but .net crypters are not compatible with non-dependancy malware.

[Fernandez]

Fernandez is right, non-dependancy crypters are compatible with .net malware, but .net crypters are not compatible with non-dependancy malware.

I didn't say that. .NET crypters are compatible with anything, the drawback is still that their .NET and won't run on half of worlds PC's but they are compatible with any bloody executable no matter what the coding language is. Same vice versa.

[Panoptic]

I have heard of many problems using .NET crypters on bots coded in c/c++. IDK if its just the bots but many are corrupted by .NET crypters.

[_Stoner]

Who in the right mind would code mass distributed software(even legitimate) with third party dependencies? That is why .NET is bad for malware. It works fine crypted if the crypter is made properly. But why would you have third party dependencies when you can create software in entirely native programming languages?