[xXMultiModZXx]

Hey guys I bought the byte crypter, and I cant get it fud :/ can someone help me ? My RAT is Luminosity Link. Thanks in advance.
-MultiModz[/u]

[Stаlkеr]

Try to use a fresh icon and also try to change the signature to something legit

[LSDoom]

What Stalker said.

The crypter itself might not be FUD and it requires a reFUD from the owner. If thats the case you just need to wait for him to update it.

[DamienVC]

Use self injection (to preserve LL rootkit)
Dont use EOF
Enable .NET support
Use a HQ icon/assembly to avoid generic detections
Dont randomly tick upon any feature
Dont use startup/persistence on both crypter and RAT, I suggest you use the crypter only for crypting; and all the basic funcs like startup/persistence from LL/the RAT

[matisshakeris]

Use self injection (to preserve LL rootkit)
Dont use EOF
Enable .NET support
Use a HQ icon/assembly to avoid generic detections
Dont randomly tick upon any feature
Dont use startup/persistence on both crypter and RAT, I suggest you use the crypter only for crypting; and all the basic funcs like startup/persistence from LL/the RAT

Disagreed. LL install adds runtime detections even kfc said it himself. So i would rather untick everything from LL

[VirtualMon3y]

Disagreed. LL install adds runtime detections even kfc said it himself. So i would rather untick everything from LL

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What he said :)

[Indahood]

Just watch the tutorial video of the crypter... The crypter is not fud but you can get 3/34 if you use an icon, and the assembly cloner don't forget the obscufcator ( the most important part)

[saavas]

try to NOT use any icon, and any assemblies, and any obfuscation. i get fud everytime ;)

[#Skyline]

Byte crypter should be FUD after every crypt you do.
I'd recommend contacting the owner regarding this also.

[Alison Wonderland]

Byte crypter should be FUD after every crypt you do.
I'd recommend contacting the owner regarding this also.

Unless it has Heuristics which can be removed with icon/assembly change
In which case its really not worth the effort to remove until a real detection appears

[#Skyline]

Unless it has Heuristics which can be removed with icon/assembly change
In which case its really not worth the effort to remove until a real detection appears

Nah fuck that shit, its gotta be secure

[AnMiCo]

Hey guys I bought the byte crypter, and I cant get it fud :/ can someone help me ? My RAT is Luminosity Link. Thanks in advance.
-MultiModz[/u]

Hey man,

what is the detection rate of byte crypter now? can you test? please answer :)

AnMiCo

[hydrophobic]

Hey man,

what is the detection rate of byte crypter now? can you test? please answer :)

AnMiCo

Well... The thread is 3 years old and LL doesn't even exist anymore

[AnMiCo]

Well... The thread is 3 years old and LL doesn't even exist anymore

can you still then test byte crypter? i don't believe all the vouches there on that sales thread of byte crypter

[hydrophobic]

can you still then test byte crypter? i don't believe all the vouches there on that sales thread of byte crypter

Ofcourse it won't be FUD, it is $60 for lifetime.
It will not be completely detected on the other hand.
I recommend something like CyberSeal if you want a decent budget crypter that is worth every single dollar you pay for or DataProtector if you have the money)