[godofagod]

If it does bypass scan and runtime there is a big chance I'm going to buy it, Looks pretty dope actually :=) + It got some other nice functions aswell, shoutout to the creator, looks sick

---

--------> Recommend* <----------

[cocainaa]

idk many kids use bytecrypter and they scan it on virustotal. What that means is 2-3 days after the update its already 10/32

Overal its a good crypter except for the start up, when i use byte start up LL keylogger seems not working for me.

And if i use LL start up ill lose my client after they restart their pc.

[Demoralise]

I wouldn't tbh. It isn't bad but purchase a private stub source from a user like N3oNight and then use any crypter source code to open and encrypt via the stub and you'll never need another crypter again.

Orion Crypter is pretty good though.

[Locochope]

yes i would recommend it, using it for 3 years now

[TrinityUK]

It's a good crypter for maybe a couple of days each month. It's not updated as regular as Ghost crypter and more people use Bytecrypter so it's FUD times are not very good overall.
I would go with Ghost crypter as somebody else has said or Get a private stub if you can.

[cocainaa]

It's a good crypter for maybe a couple of days each month. It's not updated as regular as Ghost crypter and more people use Bytecrypter so it's FUD times are not very good overall.
I would go with Ghost crypter as somebody else has said or Get a private stub if you can.

Ghostcrypter? Are you ok bro? Ghostcrypter is probably the worst crypter on this whole earth, it doesnt even bypass runtime detection and the stub is also 1mb.
But yea no wonder its only 10$ but its thrown-away money if you buy it.

Also ghostcrypter works realy bad with LL, i would invest like 20-30$ more and buy a better crypter