[hfaccount78894714312]

how are you supposed to know if you not being giving shared source public source or even stolen source if you are not allowed to decompile a hf product. i have one that im about 99% sure its same source and being mass sold . Only reason the product b4 it didnt sell was because the user was not as popular.. Now my opinion 3 people caught a guy off guard probably low balled his source because its not selling and now re branded and changed gui a bit and used there names to overprice and source not even there's and deny it...

[Junx]

No ones gonna know you decompiled something unless you tell people.

[minimalist]

how are you supposed to know if you not being giving shared source public source or even stolen source if you are not allowed to decompile a hf product.

You're not allowed to question the rules, just follow 'em:

Code

1. No decompiling of member software.

i have one that im about 99% sure its same source and being mass sold . Only reason the product b4 it didnt sell was because the user was not as popular..

Just because something was once public doesn't make it useless, the source obviously still works which is highly reputable members are selling them.

Now my opinion 3 people caught a guy off guard probably low balled his source because its not selling and now re branded and changed gui a bit and used there names to overprice and source not even there's and deny it...

If you have proof of this, just make a community alert.

No ones gonna know you decompiled something unless you tell people.

...what the hell?

[Junx]

...what the hell?

What I'm saying is sometimes you have to break the law to enforce it.

[morph]

Well, if you have the source, you did not necessarily decompile it, am I right? ;)

[Reece Morgan]

You're not allowed to question the rules, just follow 'em:

Code

1. No decompiling of member software.

That's possibly the stupidest rule I've seen yet.
Considering we are on a hacking forum, I would not use a program created by a member without checking out the source first to make sure no funny business is going on.

[Meow]

You're not allowed to question the rules, just follow 'em:

Code

1. No decompiling of member software.

I don't think anyone is that stupid to post a thread decompiling source from another HF member.

OP I guess you could do that but again, it's agains the rules and it might be bannable offense so think twice before doing anything shady.

[Reece Morgan]

I don't think anyone is that stupid to post a thread decompiling source from another HF member.

OP I guess you could do that but again, it's agains the rules and it might be bannable offense so think twice before doing anything shady.

It's kinda like using somebody else's HBO Go account.. Sure, your not supposed to, but nobody gives a fuck as long as you don't tell everyone your doing it.

[Omniscient]

if you are not allowed to decompile a hf product.

Technically not a rule. What is a rule is leaking it.

1. No decompiling of member software.

Ahh...I see that's from Judge Dredd like 6 years ago in DRDB forum. Hmm...I'll have to reword that.

And the market more or less takes care of bad products.

[minuteman]

you might not be allowed to declare that the product is a mess but atleast with the powers you have you can save yourself atleast
and much more your friends on HF!

[Junx]

you might not be allowed to declare that the product is a mess but atleast with the powers you have you can save yourself atleast
and much more your friends on HF!

If you purchased something that was stolen (source wise) you can open a deal dispute. Then people can make their own decisions on whether to purchase it or not.