Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

USG CRYPTER CVE 2017 8759 Exploit Full TUT

USG CRYPTER CVE 2017 8759 Exploit TUT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFIeBQuq...e=youtu.be

download files
http://www83.zippyshare.com/v/ND1y8UDQ/file.html
pass on file name
http://the-nightmare.com
add me
icq:716557549
skype:kareem.alex1
skype group: https://join.skype.com/pr98CGrcUfbu


YAK_CODER
TELEGRAM
Quote:Purple Kief (134) Neutral (0): Infecting HF members is a no-no. 01-09-2017,07:11

Linux™ (214) Negative (-3): Stop trying to infect people 01-09-2017, 05:14

Oh, nice try nice try

DO NOT DOWNLOAD THIS SKETCHY THING
what is the file password? the pass you gave is not working
ICQ: 695129554
(Sep 28, 2017 08:13 AM)ken0man Wrote:  what is the file password? the pass you gave is not working

dont't download it man seriously
quote my answer or i may miss yours!
(Sep 28, 2017 08:22 AM)MaDTiA Wrote:  dont't download it man seriously
Really?
who is this Purple Kief ?
stop bieng asshole
and watch the fuckin video to learn somthing

(Sep 28, 2017 08:13 AM)ken0man Wrote:  what is the file password? the pass you gave is not working
on zippyshare look into file name its on it
YAK_CODER
TELEGRAM
I don't see anything shady in this, the file looks clean from nodistribute, I'm not going to open it until I move it to my VPS but it looks like a legit exploit. Although the AutoOpen() function can trigger a few anti virus when your target opens the .doc.
(Sep 28, 2017 11:11 AM)Baud Wrote:  I don't see anything shady in this, the file looks clean from nodistribute, I'm not going to open it until I move it to my VPS but it looks like a legit exploit. Although the AutoOpen() function can trigger a few anti virus when your target opens the .doc.

Thas how real hacker Review somthing
YAK_CODER
TELEGRAM
what is that?? Macro? Really? its just a simple Poc,its not cve.do not full the members please.If you want call objects in macro there are a lot of easy ways to do that.
CVE 2017 8579 is an exploit which allows you to create a silent .doc, it has been released on github by bhdresh. If the thing OP posted contains an exe or anything other than a .txt or .py, then do not open it. The builder is coded in .py (heavily detected though).

Alright I checked it out, and indeed, this is not backdoored as far as I can see. (wouldn't run it on my own PC though).
However, I think this guy made a silent exploit into a macro. Normally, the file output from CVE 2017 8579 has a .RTF structure.
This file however has a .doc file structure (which isn't possible to exploit using this particular exploit).

He is calling the download & execution using a macro, meaning that the whole idea of a silent exploit has been defeated.
I'm sorry OP but this is useless, unless I am wrong.

For those wondering, this is the AV scan: http://viruscheckmate.com/id/jA3YXQvGtZtt
The macro is the thing raising the detection though. The version OP shared is a silent exploit technique to link the payload
combined with a macro to actually run the exploit, making it useless, since using a normal macro would be much easier, would always work
if they enable macro's, and is FUD (atleast, mine is).

Also, since this "macro" thing or however you want to call it is based on a silent exploit, it won't execute on systems that have the latest patch installed.

AKA, just use a macro. Even though this is not a bad thing to learn from and 2/40 scantime for free isn't that bad either (however I think it won't bypass at runtime since it's using a simple VBS downloading
script).

< ̄`ヽ、       / ̄>
 ゝ、  \ /⌒ヽ,ノ  /´ we r anomalous
   ゝ、 (( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) / forgive and forget
     >     ,ノ expecto patronum
     ∠_,,,/´”
(Oct 2, 2017 03:34 AM)Tsukiri Wrote:  CVE 2017 8579 is an exploit which allows you to create a silent .doc, it has been released on github by bhdresh. If the thing OP posted contains an exe or anything other than a .txt or .py, then do not open it. The builder is coded in .py (heavily detected though).

Alright I checked it out, and indeed, this is not backdoored as far as I can see. (wouldn't run it on my own PC though).
However, I think this guy made a silent exploit into a macro. Normally, the file output from CVE 2017 8579 has a .RTF structure.
This file however has a .doc file structure (which isn't possible to exploit using this particular exploit).

He is calling the download & execution using a macro, meaning that the whole idea of a silent exploit has been defeated.
I'm sorry OP but this is useless, unless I am wrong.

For those wondering, this is the AV scan: http://viruscheckmate.com/id/jA3YXQvGtZtt
The macro is the thing raising the detection though. The version OP shared is a silent exploit technique to link the payload
combined with a macro to actually run the exploit, making it useless, since using a normal macro would be much easier, would always work
if they enable macro's, and is FUD (atleast, mine is).

Also, since this "macro" thing or however you want to call it is based on a silent exploit, it won't execute on systems that have the latest patch installed.

AKA, just use a macro. Even though this is not a bad thing to learn from and 2/40 scantime for free isn't that bad either (however I think it won't bypass at runtime since it's using a simple VBS downloading
script).
Good review
but i dont share all my idia yet
look for those guys they plam me to spread virus?
how the fuck i can give them moor
YAK_CODER
TELEGRAM
(Oct 2, 2017 06:33 AM)YAK_CODER Wrote:  Good review
but i dont share all my idia yet
look for those guys they plam me to spread virus?
how the fuck i can give them moor

It's not really about an "idea". This file isn't an obfuscated exploit, either.
The exploit only works in .RTF file structures and this is a .doc file (structure).
Meaning that you aren't using an exploit at all.

I don't really think you have a clue what you're talking about to be honest. Your English is completely broken and even the topic title is ridiculous. "USG CRYPTER"? What does that have to do with anything you've shown us? You don't "crypt" an exploit, you change the code so that it doesn't get recognized by the AV vendor.
It's not like you can just encrypt the exploit source using RC4 and make it FUD like that, lol.

< ̄`ヽ、       / ̄>
 ゝ、  \ /⌒ヽ,ノ  /´ we r anomalous
   ゝ、 (( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) / forgive and forget
     >     ,ノ expecto patronum
     ∠_,,,/´”
nice one... hope this product is till on sell?


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
by HelpedyousleepNov 30, 2024 02:24 PM 2 396 Nov 30, 2024 02:24 PM
Last Post: Helpedyousleep
by scannereyefoxJul 8, 2023 12:51 AM 10 458 Jul 8, 2023 12:51 AM
Last Post: scannereyefox
by universecloudJun 22, 2022 06:51 AM 2 173 Jun 22, 2022 06:51 AM
Last Post: universecloud