Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

IzzyCrypt | FUD | Startup | Runtime & Scantime | Stable |

Contact me via PM for questions or anything else.

[Image: Fz48dMn.png]

Screenshots:

[Image: 7DqyuRo.png]

[Image: wK9TU4.jpg]
[Image: result.png]

Updates:
Release: V1.1
Quote:- New Features
- Bug fixes


Release: V1.0
Quote:- Release


Reviews:

(Jun 9, 2018 11:15 PM)ashwathama Wrote:  Got a copy as beta testing , thanks to Izzy Michel.

First of all big vouch for this HQ user. I crypted my payload, scanned on Antiscan(dot)me the file was not completely scan time FUD the detection was about 3/25 ( at the time of testing*).It is completely acceptable as the project is under BETA state and I hope the owner will fix this soon.

Now coming to runtime test ,  the payload on Win-Defender and Mcafee the file was runtime Fud however when tested on eset the file was detected on runtime.

Overall I will say its a nice crypter I may consider to buy it when it releases after BETA.

(Jun 10, 2018 09:45 AM)seler Wrote:  Nice job, I vouch this crypter so much.
I’ve tested with some rats like NetWire and it works pretty nice.
Also with miners its crypts very nice.
Just need to add assembly info but its propably will be soon in next update.
Thanks man!


* Click here to buy for 1 month!
* Click here to buy for 3 month!
* Click here to buy for 6 month!
(Jun 8, 2018 03:15 PM)M0HX Wrote:  sent you a PM for a vouch/beta test copy. 🤝

Hey,

Sounds good. I will sent you details tomorrow. Not on pc right now.
You claim the stub is FUD runtime as well as scantime, can you provide proof of runtime in a Run4Me scan? Lack of proof here.


As well as can you provide runtime bypass proof?
same theme every time. english is very incorrect. I doubt its runtime fud
vouch for IzzyMichiel!
user is really experienced, and he is working really hard on this project!

good luck with selling buddy :)
(Jun 8, 2018 03:35 PM)Swoomie Wrote:  You claim the stub is FUD runtime as well as scantime, can you provide proof of runtime in a Run4Me scan? Lack of proof here.

Hello,

You are correct! I just made this before went offline so it was a fast job! ;)
Will add a runtime scan tomorrow!

Thanks,


(Jun 8, 2018 03:37 PM)int Wrote:  same theme every time. english is very incorrect. I doubt its runtime fud

Well,

Theme is just a theme... and typos needs to be fixed ASAP! Thanks for reporting.
I don't see an "Anti-Memory Scanning" feature on your form, does your RunPE / LoadPE include this feature?
(Jun 8, 2018 03:37 PM)IzzyMichiel Wrote:  Hello,

You are correct! I just made this before went offline so it was a fast job! ;)
Will add a runtime scan tomorrow!

Thanks,



Well,

Theme is just a theme... and typos needs to be fixed ASAP! Thanks for reporting.

interesting. as the users above said, show some proof of scans
Crypter seems nice , waiting for a runtime scan.

But why scan on Jotti , doesn't it distribute the results?
[Image: result.png]
Interesting results, nice work.

Don't get me wrong but I have seen a crypter (free) with same GUI as yours here on HF , can't seem to find the thread atm.
(Jun 9, 2018 01:12 AM)ashwathama Wrote:  Interesting results, nice work.

Don't get me wrong but I have seen a crypter (free) with same GUI as yours here on HF , can't seem to find the thread atm.

GUI is a public theme called "netseal'.

Thanks,


I have received some PM for open beta.
They all will receive a PM soon when the new version is out with the license and informations... etc
I'll do 10 max slots for beta. Contact me now, first 10 will get the beta test free.

Thanks,
it sounds good work I would like to try
(Jun 9, 2018 04:56 AM)momokanich13 Wrote:  it sounds good work I would like to try

Hello,

Please send me a PM if you would like to participate in BETA testing.

Thanks,


Beta Slots Taken:
10/10 FULL
If you wish to use the crypter, you have to buy it after we ended BETA!

Contact me privately for the last spots! :)

Thanks,
Got a copy as beta testing , thanks to Izzy Michel.

First of all big vouch for this HQ user. I crypted my payload, scanned on Antiscan(dot)me the file was not completely scan time FUD the detection was about 3/25 ( at the time of testing*).It is completely acceptable as the project is under BETA state and I hope the owner will fix this soon.

Now coming to runtime test , the payload on Win-Defender and Mcafee the file was runtime Fud however when tested on eset the file was detected on runtime.

Overall I will say its a nice crypter I may consider to buy it when it releases after BETA.


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
by am00Feb 26, 2026 12:47 PM 8 410 Feb 26, 2026 12:47 PM
Last Post: am00
by Tyrone JohnsonMar 12, 2025 04:17 PM 1 503 Mar 12, 2025 04:17 PM
Last Post: DramaKing
by crypt0rk1ngJan 2, 2025 06:00 PM 1 308 Jan 2, 2025 06:00 PM
Last Post: Sticky Bot