[legitsenseuser]

No contract displayed.

Code

[align=center][video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggPKxnS43Xg&t[/video]



[color=#3399ff]we currently offer 2 products:[/color]

-a 150 Slot based league cheat, designed for pro players, streamers, or people who want to cheat on high-value main-accounts they still wanna cheat on with basic features and stream proof visuals so your viewers and anticheats wont notice the visuals.

-a cheaper casual cheat, designed for people who like to have a real custom cheat packed with a lot of features to enjoy cheating as much as possible while still maintaining the highest security level possible for valve's anticheat.


[color=#3399ff]some cheat-features available:[/color]

-a legit and customizable Aimbot-System
-Triggerbot with (optional) optimized hit-chance calculation
-Visual features like our glow esp
-a fully functional Skin Changer providing the ability to use every possible Skin in the game on every Weapon!
-features for streamers / youtubers / league cheaters like our stream-proof box esp
-an audio esp if you prefer to not use any visual features at all but still have an advantage
...and much more! for a full feature list, please visit our website and look for the product of your choice!

unlike other cheatproviders where every user receives the same product, we always make sure you are running a unique build of our client, after every time you used our cheat the client will create a new unique version of itself.
example:[img]https://i.gyazo.com/5421deff558c4119083e12d57e976305.png[/img]

in our league prouct there are also many other undisclosed security features in order to keep it undetected on every league we support, we take every effort to not get our customers banned.


[color=#3399ff]some anticheats we support:[/color]

-VAC
-[color=Lime][b]VACnet[/b][/color][i][color=Red][b]*NEW*[/b][/color][/i]
-Matchmaking
-[color=Lime][b]ESL WIRE[/b][/color]
-MOSS[i][color=Red][b]*NEW*[/b][/color][/i]
-FACEIT ServerSide AC
-Esportal
-CEVO
-SMAC
-PopFlash
-KickBack
-CSPL
-Azereus
-ZenGaming
-CyberGamer
-GFINITY
-PvPro
-KAC
-G-Loot

[size=large][color=#33cc33]unlike nearly every other cheatprovider, none ban wave ever got any of our customers banned - we have an implemented system that predicts possible upcomming detection vectors which allows us to monitor VAC updates 24/7 and secure our clients, also we do weekly (sometimes even daily) security updates in order to keep our record clean, on our forums there is also a detection history visible for the public where you can see all that by yourself.[/color][/size]

[size=x-large][b][url=http://legitsense.cc]visit legitsense.cc to buy[/url][/b][/size]

[/align]

[AlphaIndustries]

Ill check it out it a bit. looks good that it is undetected on FaceIt.

[smοked]

http://prntscr.com/jyu6hx

I find this problematic, similar to how imi mentioned this earlier. As far as I am aware there is no way that you can have unique builds with that size range without using a large amount of junk code.

[imi-tat0r]

http://prntscr.com/jyu6hx

I find this problematic, similar to how imi mentioned this earlier. As far as I am aware there is no way that you can have unique builds with that size range without using a large amount of junk code.

I also find it really concerning, that OP closed his old thread and just reopened a new one after receiving criticism.
Link to old thread: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5850556

Also even though their Privacy Policy is packed with much information, it doesn't comply with EU or in their case more specific german Law and I wouldn't buy from a site which can't even provide a proper Privacy Policy.

[smοked]

I also find it really concerning, that OP closed his old thread and just reopened a new one after receiving criticism.
Link to old thread: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5850556

Also even though their Privacy Policy is packed with much information, it doesn't comply with EU or in their case more specific german Law and I wouldn't buy from a site which can't even provide a proper Privacy Policy.

Interesting considering that according to their host it's an eu company

[imi-tat0r]

Interesting considering according to their host is an eu company

Well in fact it doesn't matter if they're registered in the EU or not, they make their website available in the EU so they have to comply with EU Law.
Nice article about this: https://www.recode.net/2018/5/16/1736094...on-privacy

P.S.: sorry for this kinda offtopic post

[Int Ptr]

Uh, how do you have "vacnet support"?

[netpulse]

Ye, at first he had just closed the thread but it seems like he wanted to clean all the bad opinions of his thread, not surprising tbh
Also, vacnet support is bs.

And ofc they do use junk code, what were you expecting?
Btw, he also deleted some features that received criticism like hwid spoofer.

[Menalix]

Ye, at first he had just closed the thread but it seems like he wanted to clean all the bad opinions of his thread, not surprising tbh
Also, vacnet support is bs.

And ofc they do use junk code, what were you expecting?
Btw, he also deleted some features that received criticism like hwid spoofer.

Ye VACNET support, so many providers have started to say that on their websites......

[netpulse]

Ye VACNET support, so many providers have started to say that on their websites......

Ye, even saw that on BSS, that was kinda weird. Especially considering vacnet is new and that it isn't efficient yet.

[unknown2me]

you simply defeat every detection vector that could affect serverside checks, vacnet sends you into overwatch after you triggered one of its serverside checks

How do you defeat "every detection vector" that's server side when you don't exactly know what's server side? You are aware that VACNET learns right(heuristics)? It doesn't just sit around and wait for you to push a bad angle.

Also I have a question about your "unique" builds, you posted a picture of file explorer and the different names and file sizes however this doesn't prove unique builds in the slightest.
You could simply be pumping data into the end of the .exe or just adding junk code. I would recommend perhaps using SigBench, even though it's not perfect it provides a better form of "proof" than your screenshot.

Apologies If I this appears in anyway negative, I was just curious and wanted to pass a little bit of advice.

[Menalix]

you simply defeat every detection vector that could affect serverside checks, vacnet sends you into overwatch after you triggered one of its serverside checks

That is not how VACNET works.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marketing

Ye I know, and I might end up doing something alike. I just find it sad that we have to lie to customers, because some have decided to write it to get more customers. I'm not implying you started it, as I've seen others do it as well.

[imi-tat0r]

what a tryhard hate from someone who exactly knows how less you care when you are not a registered company (yet). or did your p2c (which was a ressource of your client) had a perfect privacy policy at start?

I am not hating, I am just stating facts. But I guess I just struck a nerve :)

Again, the facts I mentioned and a few new ones (in a nice list so you can defend yourself to my horrific attacks)
1. You closed the old thread after you got a lot of criticism and opened a new one.
2. Your huge difference in file size on different builds, definitely is due to junk code. There is no other explanation for differences of up to 7mb
3. My pay2cheat had a sufficient privacy policy before GDPR took effect and on May 25th we updated/changed it to comply with the GDPR and even offer an overview where people can see all the private data we collect about them. So to answer your question, yes my p2c had a sufficient privacy policy from the beginning.
4. It doesn't matter if you're a registered company or not. You make your website available to the EU and you collect data about your EU website visitors. This means you have to have a proper privacy policy.
5. You claim to have good security against anticheats when you can't even properly protect your cheat against leaks.
6. You don't know who I am, I don't know who you are. But I do know that everything regarding legitsense that has been public so far, is lacking security and is not a high quality product like you say.
7. You say, you support VACnet which you just can't as you have no idea how it exactly operates (no one does except for Valve).
8. You had features like "Trustfactor boost" in the past which literally did NOTHING.

Oh and our cheat was never a resource of our client. Provide proof if you can, otherwise just be quiet

Last and final edit:

i see you talking alout about us and hate on every thread you find, are you mad or something? i dont even know who you are, if you want to take some photos with me hit me up

I just want to protect new people from buying software just because people like you make it look good when it's not

[netpulse]

The HWID spoofer received criticism cause its a useless feature for 99% of serverside ACs.
Except if you think that faceit is banning hwids through their serverside AC?
I'll have to agree with imitator, lots of useless features that does nothing except bringing (and ripping off, basically) clients that aren't that well informed.

And no, you can't support vacnet cause its new AND not efficient yet, that means that this thing is evolving each day. So nope.
Also, it looks like you haven't even bothered to understand what is vacnet, you're talking about serverside checks like if it was some kind of serverside AC when its not, its all about deep learning.
So its definitely not working like a typical serverside AC would do at all.

Also, copying gamesense name is ridiculous, you're trying to make ppls think that you're somewhat affliated or coded by the same guy.
So in the end, your cheat is all about marketing to bring uninformed ppls and rip them off.

And idk how you can even tell "idk you" to imitator and talk about taking pics when YOU ARE the nobody here.

[smοked]

Geez I think your definitely smarter than 3 established p2c owners, 2 of which own externals.

This is pure retardation