[• Enlil Wolf •]

Method Thread => Wrecked's 24/7 Automatic BTC Money Making Method [$5-$20 an HOUR] [100% AUTOPILOT]



Wolf's Vouch Review - Member of Appraisers (Invitation accepted):
=====================================================

(We as members of the Appraisers Team believe in being the first line of defense against LQ products/methods/services and we do our best in going through them to ensure that the HF marketplace has sellers, methods & services which are actually HQ and that the methods/services and the products being sold actually deliver)

Which is why we urge people to wait for vouch reviews before they buy into any method(s) or service(s).

Before I begin my review for this method, I would like to thank you for giving us ("Appraisers"), the opportunity to review your method(s) to ensure it is HQ.

On to the Method/Service:
================================

As said above, people should wait for vouch reviews before they jump into any method(s) or service(s) provided.

Wre©ked has been exceptionally professional and provided top-notch support with the numerous questions I had on what made his so-called 'method' unique compared to all other gambling scripts available on the forum. Gambling is after all gambling and we are bound to lose money in the end anyway if we aren't careful. I'm glad that OP was very prompt in his responses and explained in details all my queries. Most importantly out of all the queries I had - he made it clear that this was not a script he was selling for bustadice or other similar betting sites. This was based on the probability that he had come up with after hours & hours of testing on his front.

As OP had granted me a vouch copy yet again, I had been working hard & diligently checking in on this for the past few hours on the method provided by Wre©ked.
(Because self-proclaimed words can only carry you so far - we needed to know if this is something that actually works)

My initial thoughts after glancing at the method - Looks Promising but let's test it in action.



Originality: Quite Original in terms of Betting & Gambling (7/10)

Let's start with one of the most important things to any methods/services being provided. How original is the method? Why is it important?

Spoiler (Click to View)

I have had experience with most of the sub-par 'Martingale' betting scripts being sold on HF as I had bought into those in the past and let's just say - it has never ended well neither for me or for any of the buyers in general. Of course, all sellers will defend themselves in the end by saying it is gambling. Which is true but then again why are you promoting something promising false beliefs that it will make you money - when we are going to lose money in the end anyway. Right? doesn't make any sense. Their most common defense is saying - we are giving you the winning edge to make some quick profit but it never truly works out in longer time periods unless you end up using a high bankroll which contradicts the usual notion - 'Don't bet more than you're willing to lose'

Most people on HF are looking to make consistent long-term earnings via methods or services provided but let me clarify that 'Gambling' is not the way to do that. You can't predict or fool the 'system' - they always end up winning in the end, no matter what the sellers end up saying. I haven't met anyone who got rich just by betting & gambling using a script from here or any other forum as a matter of fact. So, keep that in mind when you are investing in this. But with moderate use and not getting greedy, I can see this particular method working quite well compared to other gambling scripts which are being sold on here. From my experience, 99% of them are practically useless and in my view 'worthless'

But in terms of originality for this method - it's a breath of fresh air that sellers like the OP are trying to bring in something new to the marketplace in terms of 'Gambling & Betting'. The best we can rate this method's originality is around 7. Because after going through multiple known strategies around forums & youtube videos, I was pleased to find in my research that the 'probability method' he is selling is something completely new & unique and not some recycled 'shit'. And just for that, this method deserves the '7' for being original and also because OP is not selling us a recycled 'Martingale based script'.



Content: A few things can be added (or) improved to bolster the Quality (6.5/10)

Next most important thing - Is the content satisfactory?

Spoiler (Click to View)

Well, firstly when you buy into this method - OP will be providing you a (.PDF) which details his method, the steps with a few accompanying pictures, the probability method and of course a few additional tips which helps in making the earnings more efficient.

Since this particular method is something which boasts itself of being able to generate a 'certain sum' per hour based on your 'capital investment' - I had to make sure that what he claims is actually backed up by hard evidence. Based on my research and testing done for this method, I have had it running for 20+ hours now at this point and with a capital of $50 which is the recommended amount specified by him, I have generated about $234 in profits besides my $50 capital. OP claims, it's possible to do $5-10/hour - in the end, it depends on the PC that you're using. With lower end PC's & Laptops generating about $5-6 and higher end Laptops & PC's pulling in $7-10. By this calculation, your principal is released within 5-10 hours from starting.

At which point, I suggest you pull out your initial investment and keep it running with the House money. I'll further keep this running for a full 24 hours and more to see how long it can keep running without going bust. OP specified, while he was formulating this method - that he had it running for almost a week with 3 million in rotational bets, I have only crossed the 50 Thousand mark at the time of writing this review, so let's see if it can go the distance.

But from my initial 24 hour impression, I am glad to see that I haven't lost money for the first time while trying something which is associated with 'Gambling & Betting'.
Now coming back to the content provided by the OP, there is something I'd have liked to see in the (.PDF) - for instance, having an excel sheet which pre-determines the 'capital' needed based on the 'base bet' you're starting with. It's quite easy and I am sure he can create an Excel sheet for that because having a predetermined value in your (.PDF) is not enough for all people. Some rich people would probably want to try it with $500-1000 and for them having something where they can try and check it for themselves without disturbing the OP would be beneficial. At one point, it can become troublesome for him and for the buyers as well. So, it's best to give the tools to your customers and only be bothered with other important queries rather than trivial ones like - "Hey, how much can I get with this?" or "How much should I invest, can you check it for me?"

Other than that, it would have been great to explain in your (.PDF) on how the probability method works.
Something like a segment titled, "About the probability method and why it works -" something like that would be a good addition.



Difficulty: Not difficult to Set-up at all (10/10)

How difficult is the thing? Amateur or Pro level?

Spoiler (Click to View)

From my experience, the (.PDF) provided is more than enough to guide you with all the steps. OP had made sure, he posted accompanying pictures so that his steps are not confusing and people don't end up blaming him for someone setting it up wrong. Other than that, from my own personal experience & testing - it basically took me 3-4 minutes to set it all up. So far, I haven't had to touch it - so it is indeed fully autopilot.

[i]I believe you can also rent a VPS and have it run there especially if you don't have a laptop or desktop that you would want to keep it running for 24/7.

I haven't personally tried that but it seems doable from what he explained. The only thing we need to make sure is that we rent a powerful enough VPS to let it run in its optimum capacity. Other than that, I'd say setting everything is easy and anyone can do it.[/i]



Price: Reasonable Enough (7/10)

Pricing structure - Is it okay?

Spoiler (Click to View)

On the thread, OP is stating that he is currently going to sell only 10 copies of the method. Not sure, if he intends to sell more down the line - I believe he won't but based on his current breakdown. I would say the price is justifiable for two reasons - since it is not a 'Martingale based script' and secondly because you can pull out your capital in 5-10 hours at most. Based on that, I'd say even with the last few copies being $75 - it'd still be at a fair price point.



Overall: Gambling is Gambling, Use Moderately
(A Wolf in a Sheep's clothing doesn't make it a Sheep) (7.6/10)


My Verdict - Be Responsible as it is still considered 'Gambling'

Spoiler (Click to View)

As highlighted above, I am extremely pleased with what I have seen. This may not be a 'Gambling Script' but don't forget that this is still a 'Gambling method'. Be responsible and use with caution. In terms of everything, I have seen on the forums - I applaud the OP for bringing in something unique. I'd, of course, love to see some minor additions & changes to make the final price tag of $75 for the last few copies to be even more viable than it already is.

But as I said above, Gambling is Gambling' - Be moderate, Control your greed & urges and pull out in advance.
(Don't blame the seller for your mistakes and take responsibility for your own actions especially when you're the one gambling)

(Have a Lovely & Great Day everyone)
Regards, Wolf 🤝

[Wre©ked]

You are the best. Absolute joy working with you and thank you very very much for this HQ review. What you do is greatly appreciated!

[Jombah]

Glad to see you’re on the Appraisers, definitely the best reviewer currently.

[Wre©ked]

Glad to see you’re on the Appraisers, definitely the best reviewer currently.

Without a doubt, his reviews are always top of the line!

[Deal]

What the fuck is this review?
This is so biased I can’t even.. It is so obvious that this review is meant to show the shitty method sellers that they should not be worried about the reviews because you guys have a hard time finding some to review. Don’t tell me that a fucking gambling script can get top ratings in everything.
This is the most shittiest and biased shit I have ever seen.

You are a fucking disgrace OP and this is not the standard I would have expected from the Divineds chosen ones.
Max ratings should be for a killer of a killer method. Not in a thousand years should a gambling script or whatever get max ratings.

Fuck you OP. And also fuck wrecked and you too Jombah for riding hard dick.
I know there are good and unbiased dudes on Appraisers. You are not one of them. So get the fuck off.

[sonex]

What the fuck is this review?
This is so biased I can’t even.. It is so obvious that this review is meant to show the shitty method sellers that they should not be worried about the reviews because you guys have a hard time finding some to review.

Ouch. Could not have said it better myself.

I know there are good and unbiased dudes on Appraisers.

This thread clearly shows you can pay for positive review thus the entire group is useless.

On a site note I've heard a rumor they share your PDF with other group members (yet they claim only the reviewer reads it) and eventually one of them leaks it 😧

[BTC]

On a site note I've heard a rumor they share your PDF with other group members (yet they claim only the reviewer reads it) and eventually one of them leaks it 😧

Those are some pretty serious allegations, you should back up with some sort of proof / reasoning rather than just "I've heard a rumor".

In no way am I disagreeing with you or stating my opinion on this matter, I have no opinion on whether they do or don't do it. I just fear that spreading rumor / propaganda is recipe for disaster, nobody is to know whether you heard this rumor from somebody in which their word should be trusted.

As per the review itself, regardless of ratings and such, I have not seen the method in my own perspective, and can not give an informed decision so I should not judge what the OP has stated. This would make me ignorant.

However, I can appreciate the time and efforts put in to writing such a lengthy, high quality post.

[Spaark]

This thread clearly shows you can pay for positive review thus the entire group is useless.

On a site note I've heard a rumor they share your PDF with other group members (yet they claim only the reviewer reads it) and eventually one of them leaks it 😧

I've personally never been offered payment for a positive review. Reviews by Appraisers members are supposed to be unbiased and critical. Wolf has redone this review as a result of public scrutiny and internal pressure on his standard of work. It's his first review for the group and I can assure you he's learnt his lesson.

I think it's immature of you to go after the whole group over this single review. Not to mention claim that we spread methods. This is simply untrue.

[Deal]

Oh no I can’t cope. You literally changed a rating from 11/10 to 6.5/10. This proves that the review was in the beginning very biased. An update to everyone that didn’t read before:

The ratings were changed. Before they were:

11/10
10/10
10/10
11/10

Won’t comment more on the thread. I appreciate that you have thought about what I said, and hope that next time you will be objective in your review. Because for sure things like
this damages the reputation of the appraisers.

[• Enlil Wolf •]

Oh no I can’t cope. You literally changed a rating from 11/10 to 6.5/10. This proves that the review was in the beginning very biased. An update to everyone that didn’t read before:

The ratings were changed. Before they were:

11/10
10/10
10/10
11/10

Won’t comment more on the thread. I appreciate that you have thought about what I said, and hope that next time you will be objective in your review. Because for sure things like
this damages the reputation of the appraisers.

At first, I thought I wouldn't reply back because I didn't know what to respond back as but I want you to know that I take constructive criticism very seriously.

I appreciate the fact that you think well of our Group and took the time to express your opinions on why you thought my review was biased. I took that into serious consideration and redid the whole review looking at it from a critical point of view. I just want to clarify that I am new to the whole point of reviewing where I am not doing a review based on my experience & myself but I am also now representing a standard set by the group. It's hardly been a few hours since I joined but I am willing to learn and improve myself. I clearly saw the flaws I had in my review because of which I re-did the whole thing.

Rest assured, my future reviews will be far harsher & critical and judged based on what it is rather by who it is from.

But since writing is something I love to do and I am sincerely very sorry for my mistake and I apologize to each and every one of you including all the members of Appraisers publicly. Hope you all take my apology into consideration.

Regards, Wolf.

[BTC]

At first, I thought I wouldn't reply back because I didn't know what to respond back as but I want you to know that I take constructive criticism very seriously.

I took that into serious consideration and redid the whole review looking at it from a critical point of view.

This is extremely respectable and honorable, takes a real man to admit their faults and attempt to correct them. You also handled in a much more professional manner than the users who were so clearly angered by your initial review.

“If you make a mistake and do not correct it, this is called a mistake.” -Confucius

[sonex]

I think it's immature of you to go after the whole group over this single review. Not to mention claim that we spread methods. This is simply untrue.

I think it's more immature to say I claimed something I obviously did not. I've said I heard a rumor, it's up to you or someone else figure whether it's the truth or not.

The obvious lack of your reviews recently + the recent review (this one) gives me right to state my opinion based on the facts I've seen. I'm not going after your group lmao dont get salty for no reason. Official Reviewers back in the days had issues cause it's hard to trust individuals so I somehow doubt you were able to deal with it since I'm sitting here reading 11/10 review for a GAMBLING METHOD.

I personally dont care but your reviews are far from transparent although you present them that way. If the public criticism makes you change ratings, what does money do then? I rest my case (not that I had any lol).

[Spaark]

I think it's more immature to say I claimed something I obviously did not. I've said I heard a rumor, it's up to you or someone else figure whether it's the truth or not.

The obvious lack of your reviews recently + the recent review (this one) gives me right to state my opinion based on the facts I've seen. I'm not going after your group lmao dont get salty for no reason. Official Reviewers back in the days had issues cause it's hard to trust individuals so I somehow doubt you were able to deal with it since I'm sitting here reading 11/10 review for a GAMBLING METHOD.

I personally dont care but your reviews are far from transparent although you present them that way. If the public criticism makes you change ratings, what does money do then? I rest my case (not that I had any lol).

I understand where you're coming from. But as I said, this review was altered by public scrutiny as well as internal standards within the group. We were not happy with it and asked him to have it redone. I'm sure we had similar reactions reading the initial review, it was very poor and lacking in the quality aspects Appraisers and Reviewers should be known for. It wasn't what should bare our groups name and I think Wolf understands that now. Also, to address the lack of reviews recently: We've only recently started reviews again. The group was wiped due to mass inactivity and new members including myself were added within the past week.

In regards to these rumours. I must've misread what you said, but yeah, I want to put it to rest. Anyone found spreading methods will be blacklisted from the group, it's something we take seriously. Otherwise, I'll personally take on your criticism and I'm sure more scrutiny will be put into the quality expected of our members into the future.

Thanks sonex.

[Divined]

I think it's more immature to say I claimed something I obviously did not. I've said I heard a rumor, it's up to you or someone else figure whether it's the truth or not.

The obvious lack of your reviews recently + the recent review (this one) gives me right to state my opinion based on the facts I've seen. I'm not going after your group lmao dont get salty for no reason. Official Reviewers back in the days had issues cause it's hard to trust individuals so I somehow doubt you were able to deal with it since I'm sitting here reading 11/10 review for a GAMBLING METHOD.

I personally dont care but your reviews are far from transparent although you present them that way. If the public criticism makes you change ratings, what does money do then? I rest my case (not that I had any lol).

Our group member already had a talking to about this shortly after the review was posted and this won't happen again.

[SUI-3183372]

At first, I thought I wouldn't reply back because I didn't know what to respond back as but I want you to know that I take constructive criticism very seriously.

I appreciate the fact that you think well of our Group and took the time to express your opinions on why you thought my review was biased. I took that into serious consideration and redid the whole review looking at it from a critical point of view. I just want to clarify that I am new to the whole point of reviewing where I am not doing a review based on my experience & myself but I am also now representing a standard set by the group. It's hardly been a few hours since I joined but I am willing to learn and improve myself. I clearly saw the flaws I had in my review because of which I re-did the whole thing.

Rest assured, my future reviews will be far harsher & critical and judged based on what it is rather by who it is from.

But since writing is something I love to do and I am sincerely very sorry for my mistake and I apologize to each and every one of you including all the members of Appraisers publicly. Hope you all take my apology into consideration.

Regards, Wolf.

Too bad you've destroyed your accountability already.

Either you were bought, you were using your position to promote a friend, or you simply do not understand what you are reviewing. There's no other excuse for the initial review that you gave, and any of these reasons is enough for me to disregard any review you post ever again as nothing more than biased or paid for rubbish.

You did yourself a great disservice by allowing your friends to manipulate you into looking like being a giant shill.

This is why Omni needs to bring back an official Reviewers group with a leader who won't stand for bullshit like this. Before this I knew any "review group" that wasnt properly managed would just be a cesspool of abuse, and because of this you've done a terrific job of verifying that appraisers is no different.
My opinion of appraisers at this point is it likely a circle jerk of friends vouching for each other and their friends or vouching for money. Cool group.