Sep 18, 2019 06:32 PM
(This post was last modified: Sep 18, 2019 06:49 PM by gigajew.)
Modified this UAC exploit to run as admin without a prompt. Thanks to Nyan cat, wouldn't be aware of the CVE if it wasn't for them. Nyan's thread: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6008376
Posting here as a bookmark so i can come back to it later
Thanks for sharing
Sep 19, 2019 06:57 PM
(This post was last modified: Sep 19, 2019 07:23 PM by MavenGradle.)
Apparently you think it's fine to allow delays that are less than zero. Why even use a property?
(Sep 19, 2019 06:57 PM)MavenGradle Wrote: Apparently you think it's fine to allow delays that are less than zero. Why even use a property?
Elaborate please
Sep 19, 2019 07:40 PM
(This post was last modified: Sep 19, 2019 07:47 PM by MavenGradle.)
(Sep 19, 2019 07:39 PM)gigajew Wrote: Elaborate please
Code public static int Timeout { get; set; } = 100;
On a side note, too bad you don't follow the object oriented principals.
again a wonderful code snippet from you...
BTC - bc1q3efew3yzfwhdz290dafykaw0a2w56g2j69g2c6
ETH - 0xf1c873217032468990D3313da6509D1b813c4671
USDT - 0xf1c873217032468990D3313da6509D1b813c4671
PP - [email protected]
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Sep 19, 2019 07:40 PM)MavenGradle Wrote: Code public static int Timeout { get; set; } = 100;
On a side note, too bad you don't follow the object oriented principals.
What the fuck is wrong with you guys?
Every single time he posts, you have one of losers have to be assholes about it rather than give proper constructive criticism / the fix to the issue.
No wonder this section is dying.
Thanks for the share OP.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Amazing work and very clean code. Good job
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Oct 3, 2019 10:37 AM
(This post was last modified: Oct 3, 2019 10:39 AM by learner319.)
(Sep 21, 2019 07:14 AM)NYANxCAT Wrote: Amazing work and very clean code. Good job
Brother if you mind please,Will you add more silent UAC bypass method and reverse proxy ( Quasar Rat has this option but no multiple ddns suport ) ?.I really love your works.I have seen you in github first then HF.I always pray for you <3
Eager to test this but, i have a problem compiling the code.
FileStream.FlushAsync() is not available on the NetFramework 4.0 (only 4.5 and above)
and i can(t switch from 4.0 to 4.5.
Any thoughts ?
Also seems like await does not work with Task as implemented in NetFramework 4.0.
Oct 4, 2019 10:56 AM
(This post was last modified: Oct 4, 2019 10:58 AM by MavenGradle.)
(Oct 3, 2019 03:32 PM)max_int Wrote: Eager to test this but, i have a problem compiling the code.
FileStream.FlushAsync() is not available on the NetFramework 4.0 (only 4.5 and above)
and i can(t switch from 4.0 to 4.5.
Any thoughts ?
Also seems like await does not work with Task as implemented in NetFramework 4.0.
Asynchronous methods are not available in < .NET 4.5 && < C# 5. You'd have to switch your application to >= .NET 4.5, transpile some of the functionality of async await yourself (for which you'd need to know and understand how they are implemented in the .NET Framework) or use a nuget package that transpiles some of the logic to older versions:
https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft...nc/1.0.168
Be warned though, this nuget package is extremely outdated and you might face several issues but the package is provided by Microsoft. In any case, why would you still be using .NET 4.0 in this day and age?
To make this work, do i need to replace the Stub.cs in Visual studio to yours? :)
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Very good thread. Thank you!
Nice dude, will analyze in the future
(Oct 4, 2019 10:56 AM)MavenGradle Wrote: Asynchronous methods are not available in < .NET 4.5 && < C# 5. You'd have to switch your application to >= .NET 4.5, transpile some of the functionality of async await yourself (for which you'd need to know and understand how they are implemented in the .NET Framework) or use a nuget package that transpiles some of the logic to older versions:
https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft...nc/1.0.168
Be warned though, this nuget package is extremely outdated and you might face several issues but the package is provided by Microsoft. In any case, why would you still be using .NET 4.0 in this day and age? you know you did too much programming when you use && instead of &
xD
“I wish I could say everything in one word. I hate all the things that can happen between the beginning of a sentence and the end.” ~ Leonard Cohen
|