[notahackerman]

hello guys, how to bypass this thing?

Trojan:Win32/Wacatac.D!ml

it's the result on scan on antiscan.me for Windows Defender..

some1 have an idea?

[VisualSoft]

Its simple, replace the code which is causing that detection.

[notahackerman]

Its simple, replace the code which is causing that detection.

yeah, ofc lmao you're mastermind, thank you help wtf..

should i replace with? lol

[Shadow_Cloud]

yeah, ofc lmao you're mastermind, thank you help wtf..

should i replace with? lol

You really aren't giving us enough info. Do you even know which code is causing the detection? If you break this down to smallest possible form of which code flags the detection, we might be able to help. But without any idea of the code causing this, how should we know what to replace it with?

[VisualSoft]

yeah, ofc lmao you're mastermind, thank you help wtf..

should i replace with? lol

What should you replace?
Untill and unless we dont have the code you used Only GOD Can tell what to replace 👍

[notahackerman]

You really aren't giving us enough info.  Do you even know which code is causing the detection?  If you break this down to smallest possible form of which code flags the detection, we might be able to help.  But without any idea of the code causing this, how should we know what to replace it with?

What should you replace?
Untill and unless we dont have the code you used Only GOD Can tell what to replace 👍

i'm using this one, https://github.com/NYAN-x-CAT/Bitcoin-Gr...Program.cs

thx nyan cat

what should i replace to avoid that detection guys?

[Shadow_Cloud]

i'm using this one, https://github.com/NYAN-x-CAT/Bitcoin-Gr...Program.cs

thx nyan cat

what should i replace to avoid that detection guys?

Can you tell us which part is being detected?

[notahackerman]

Can you tell us which part is being detected?

how could i find out?

it's the whole source and if you google the Wacatac meaning it's something like:
https://malwarefixes.com/threats/trojanw...catac-dml/

[Shadow_Cloud]

how could i find out?

it's the whole source and if you google the Wacatac meaning it's something like:
https://malwarefixes.com/threats/trojanw...catac-dml/

Typically you can narrow this down to a file/class based on the description of the detection. But we don't have your code, its going to be very hard for us to divine this.

[notahackerman]

Typically you can narrow this down to a file/class based on the description of the detection.  But we don't have your code, its going to be very hard for us to divine this.

nevermind, the confuserEx made it, thank you anyway

[VisualSoft]

In case you are using that Rat, I would suggest you to use a Crypter,
In case you plan to use that particular Feature, then I suggest you to Comment functions of that project and see at which point the detection goes.

---

nevermind, the confuserEx made it, thank you anyway

It wont be for long, SO I would suggest you to find some other option to FUD.

[__Digital__]

how could i find out?

it's the whole source and if you google the Wacatac meaning it's something like:
https://malwarefixes.com/threats/trojanw...catac-dml/

You sir are retarded, its called comment out the code piece by piece until its undetected. thats how you figure out whats getting flagged. it is not rocket science to figure it out.

confuserex is not always needed, learn to protect your code in other ways

[notahackerman]

You sir are retarded, its called comment out the code piece by piece until its undetected. thats how you figure out whats getting flagged. it is not rocket science to figure it out.

confuserex is not always needed, learn to protect your code in other ways

anyway, the problem is fixed, some junk codes added and stop using confuserx and WD is bypassed...
but on ILSPY i still can see my source, what should i do 😒

---

You sir are retarded, its called comment out the code piece by piece until its undetected. thats how you figure out whats getting flagged. it is not rocket science to figure it out.

confuserex is not always needed, learn to protect your code in other ways

maybe Dotfuscator is more good or NETreactor? i have to protect the code 😎

[Accord]

anyway, the problem is fixed, some junk codes added and stop using confuserx and WD is bypassed...
but on ILSPY i still can see my source, what should i do 😒

---

maybe Dotfuscator is more good or NETreactor? i have to protect the code 😎

Use netguard, theyre offering excellent service for cheaper price.

[notahackerman]

Use netguard, theyre offering excellent service for cheaper price.

i'm using code dom as builder to compile the source from source.cs

if i'll buy netguard and then crypt the builder, the source compiled will be crypted too or?