Cryptocurrency Surveillance Provision Buried in the Infrastructure Bill is a Disaster |
|
reality
Something is definitely cooking. Im surprised the market is acting the way it is. I think Wyden amendment will pass and inflows of institutions will come back. Once GBTC premiums go back to positive or atleast less than the -1-2%. The move to 100k will be quick and ferocious.
![]() Crypto Degen
My thread https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6166977 is also relevant
I read about this too. So this would treat every Staking platform, online wallets, defi and such as brokers (to my understanding). The only survivors of this bill, if passed, would be proof of work consensus. If this bill does pass, most crypto innovation would be crushed and completely slowed down, giving the green light to Bitcoin, Litecoin and PoW Ethereum to carry on (Correct me if I got this wrong please!!!).
My thoughts around this are that the Reserve recognize they cannot put an end to BTC, so they have chosen to attack all innovation behind it. did they choose the winner?
Aug 7, 2021 08:58 AM
(This post was last modified: Aug 7, 2021 09:22 AM by shreder.)
(Aug 7, 2021 07:23 AM)SeekHelp Wrote: I read about this too. So this would treat every Staking platform, online wallets, defi and such as brokers (to my understanding). The only survivors of this bill, if passed, would be proof of work consensus. If this bill does pass, most crypto innovation would be crushed and completely slowed down, giving the green light to Bitcoin, Litecoin and PoW Ethereum to carry on (Correct me if I got this wrong please!!!). There is no winner. Without protocol and software developers there is no network, imagine not having Satoshi. Everyone will be losers, especially the US as everything moves out to other countries. Mining is only a part of the network, this amendment is not good for node operators either. Apparently, validators are now excluded. But software/protocol developers are still not. This is far from over.
Aug 7, 2021 09:54 AM
(This post was last modified: Aug 7, 2021 09:56 AM by shreder.)
(Aug 7, 2021 09:40 AM)Focus Broken Wrote: Satoshi Nakamoto isn't his real name, it's a pseudonym, no one knows for sure who he is. You mean "imagine not having Vitalik"? You assume it's not his name, but you know just as much as I do if it's real or not. I'm not even remotely scared of them taking down the network. It's impossible for them to detect, I require no vast amounts of electricity or specialized hardware. |
|
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||
| Thread / Author | Replies | Views | Last Post |
| by digital2keyOct 4, 2025 12:12 AM | 0 | 114 |
Oct 4, 2025 12:12 AM Last Post: digital2key |
| by StanleySep 25, 2025 01:49 PM | 1 | 88 |
Sep 25, 2025 01:49 PM Last Post: LSD |
| by BlueLight™Dec 10, 2023 03:14 PM | 4 | 484 |
Dec 10, 2023 03:14 PM Last Post: Marvelous |

![[Image: c8649a8368d365df131c53888689ba07.png]](https://i.gyazo.com/c8649a8368d365df131c53888689ba07.png)


![[Image: LMLKbLk.png]](https://i.imgur.com/LMLKbLk.png)
