[Hackers]

Spielberg says "I can now present Disclosure Day and say: wouldn’t it be wonderful when people realize, after watching this film, that everything is true and always has been?”

Check out the upcoming moving Disclosure Day. Even if you want to treat it as pure fiction, it's going to be a really great movie. Definitely worth a watch.






Are you ready friends?
Are you ready for disclosure?
You will hear about disclosure whether you like it or not.
Some of your friends & family will call you ignorant if you ignore it.
It is best to just mentally prepare yourself for what is to come.

And be wary of those who tell you what to believe specifically. There is a difference between acknowledging the existence of X and then being told that X is because of Y, and X comes for/from Z, and you must do A-B-C or else D-E-F. This analogy is meant to help you understand that there is and will continue to be an abundant amount of evidence that what we know about the world is not a complete picture. But don't let someone use the revealing of evidence as a manipulation tactic to have you believe in something that isn't proven. For example, you can show me a Banana, but that alone doesn't prove where it came from. Know the difference.

[Mastercarder]

I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying here.

People make the mistake of thinking everything is either 100% fake or 100% true, when reality is usually somewhere in the middle. I do believe there are things hidden from the public or slowly introduced over time through media, movies, and narratives. But at the same time, I also agree with your point about not blindly accepting the explanation that comes with the “disclosure”.

Just because evidence of something exists doesn’t automatically prove the entire story attached to it. That’s where critical thinking matters most.

The banana analogy explained it perfectly.

[Hackers]

I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying here.

People make the mistake of thinking everything is either 100% fake or 100% true, when reality is usually somewhere in the middle. I do believe there are things hidden from the public or slowly introduced over time through media, movies, and narratives. But at the same time, I also agree with your point about not blindly accepting the explanation that comes with the “disclosure”.

Just because evidence of something exists doesn’t automatically prove the entire story attached to it. That’s where critical thinking matters most.

The banana analogy explained it perfectly.

So glad you saw this. It's probably more important for people to read into the banana analogy than the other things I've said. I keep harping on it because knowing the difference is going to be really, really important.

From what I understand, we are going to continue to see puzzling evidence, but then be told to believe things we can't exactly prove. I think we see this already. JD Vance says he believes UAPs are possibly demons. Congress rep Luna says to read the Book of Enoch, and implying they are the Watchers. Skeptics will tell you they are classified gov projects, made by humans. The ancient aliens guy would tell you they've always been here.

The point is that we are in for a whirlwind of real information and evidence, paired with everyone's hot take on what it all means. It's going to be a weird few years as people sift through the BS.

There are also a number of people involved in this topic who are making this same type of warning, and I feel strongly that I should be warning people too.

I've mentally prepped myself to be able to accept any outcome. I am not fearful. What I do worry about is the level of confusion, arguments, and alternate belief systems that may arise from this.

So, I kind of am skipping ahead. I do think even the world's strongest skeptics and naysayers will come to realize certain truths. So, assuming that happens, the next conversation isn't "does something like this exist?", it becomes "well, what the hell am I looking at, where is it from, when did it start happening?" and so if people start to understand this difference between What/When and then Who/Where/Why, they'll be much better off.

Up until now, we've really benefitted from plausible deniability, the stigma of believing, and the normalcy of ignoring the topic as a hoax. The majority of people would probably say that this whole topic is a hoax. But that is changing. The problem is that it's a lot easier to deal with communities who either believe (but are stigmatized as 'crazy') or don't believe (nothing is wrong, nothing to see here). It's a lot more difficult to plan for a future where most people agree there's a phenomenon, but disagree with the rest of it. When you take away the ability to ignore the topic, people are forced to confront it. And that's what disclosure is.

[Miles Morales]

I don't believe in imagination/creativity at all, some are just more gifted into running the data better than others, that's all

[Hackers]

I don't believe in imagination/creativity at all, some are just more gifted into running the data better than others, that's all

[SIM-5742478]

definitely going to watch it today , The name steven Spielberg is enough