[Dogelan]

What happens when you run CUDA BarsWF on a system with a GeForce GTX 670 FTW video card and an AMD Phenom II X6 1090T processor overclocked to 4.0GHz.


Hehehehe. Pretty neat 😎

[kickerbat]

Hashcat is faster. Also Hashcat hash more methods including salting etc

[Dogelan]

Hashcat is faster. Also Hashcat hash more methods including salting etc

Nope.avi

BarsWF uses GPU Acceleration which increases the speed by HOLY SHIT A FUCKTON.

Not only that, but it's far easier to use BarsWF. Hashcat is a fucking struggle to use, and slower ._.

[hirez]

You live in the stone age? BarsWF is many times slower than hashcat.

Hashcat is GPU accelerated: http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-lite/

[Dogelan]

You live in the stone age? BarsWF is many times slower than hashcat.

Hashcat is GPU accelerated: http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-lite/

Whatever, I just prefer BarsWF.

Thanks.

[banthex]

Hm. AMD Cards are better for cracking. I have 2 ATI 5850 and i get much more then 2200 Mhash/s with each one. I'm using hashcat.

[kickerbat]

Moral of the story is, Hashcat. Problem solved.

/close thread