[iTHX]

The difference is when we agree to the terms of service by using a FREE-mium based application, we have already accepted that they are allowed to use our information for marketing purposes. But in this case it's a different story, nobody signs up to a website to have their credentials leaked, and hacked and tbh. I'm surprised that WLI was up for so long on the clear web. Best of luck to the admins in court, hopefully they have some good lawyers.

what was it that they actually did wrong? It must've said somewhere that you cannot use for malicious purposes, i.e. hacking.

[Zee]

what was it that they actually did wrong? It must've said somewhere that you cannot use for malicious purposes, i.e. hacking.

If they had censored the passwords, it would make sense as you could use it for legal purposes as well. By allowing users to pay to view the passwords, it kinda makes it obvious what purpose it is meant for. Take a look at a site like haveibeenpwned, they offer a similar service, but they dont necessarily show the details.