Damn, alright thats good. Im liking this.
Alot better! Good job Omniscient.
I believe 100% should be 2 weeks Limited.
Banning should only be done by Staff when they see it be necessary.
:P I love it good chanmges :P I love you too no homo brah.
Wow thanks for the heads up omni this will stop LQP
Shits getting pretty tight around here
I wonder if this is just temporary or what
Finally people won't take the piss, and think they are cool showing off their Red name.
i love the new changes you have done. i think this should keep the site running more smoothly.
(Aug 11, 2011 12:53 PM)Quiet. Wrote: What happens if you have say a 95% warning level and you get a warning for 15 or 25%?
You just go to 100% but it will take longer to lose the 100% wanring
(Aug 11, 2011 12:54 PM)Richie Wrote: The new changes are awesome, especially the low quality warning change.
I disagree, if you get to 100% you deserve to be banned. It isn't hard not to get warnings, especially multiple.
4 LQP can get you 2 weeks banned. And you know how it is when Staff can make mistakes, and the hassle and what not you have to go to try to convince staff to remove warning.
Not worth it IMO.
Omniscient is poting another new thread in this section.
LOL, lets see what is next.
Not harsh enough IMHO, go for 3 days post suspension and limited for over a month. When you're trying to be strict you really got to be strict.
What about the currently limited users? Say for example those permanently limited or limited for months?
~A
Good updates. I fully support the heavier restrictions.
(Aug 11, 2011 12:58 PM)Genuine Wrote: With the 24hr suspension be manually handed by Admins/Staff or will it be an automatic thing.
For example:
I get a 24hr post suspension, when the 24hr's are up and no Staff is online, will I be able to post or will I have to wait for a Admin/Staff to get on and manually change it.
It's at warning level, you will never get warning level without a staff there, limitations etc will most likely be automatic after a certain warning percent.
This is a great idea, I like staff which enforce there rules.
(Aug 11, 2011 01:00 PM)Riggs Wrote: I think they're reasonable as they are now. It would be unfair on new members that still need to adequately familiarize themselves with the rules if the consequences of violating them were too harsh.
Theres a reason we have a bunch of people posting at welcomes saying read helpdocs here. If they don't take the time reading the rules, they should be banned/limited.
|