[6e756c6c]

The profit of using both RSA and AES?
The AES key can still be read, making it nothing harder to crack the RSA with or without AES.

No, you shouldn't encrypt large amounts of data with RSA so the idea is to encrypt a symmetric key (AES) with RSA.

[[H]ell]

No, you shouldn't encrypt large amounts of data with RSA so the idea is to encrypt a symmetric key (AES) with RSA.

Don't know what large amounts of data you would have to encrypt using a HWID protector, but than again, how would you acquire the master key to decrypt the AES key?

You would have to store the master key in you're client app, rendering the RSA completely useless.

Or you could store it on a webserver, and than use a web request to retrieve the master key, which makes you vulnerable to packet sniffing again.

Please enlighten me on this.

[6e756c6c]

The AES key would be randomly generated when needed, encrypted with your RSA public key, and sent along with the rest of the encrypted data to the remote server.

[TLF-KoBE]

The AES key would be randomly generated when needed, encrypted with your RSA public key, and sent along with the rest of the encrypted data to the remote server.

Sounds smart... I would need to modify mine a bit to implement something like that. Thank you both for the info.

[Doctor07]

I still cant get over the fact of how good this is,
it seems amazing and i thought it should sell well to thoes
begginer devlopers that want to secure their program :D

[๖ۣۜKreedz๖ ™]

Looks nice,but you should release it for free as there is great HWID locks for like 5$,haffaffy one or something like this