(Jun 14, 2011 07:52 AM)Guns N Roses Wrote: >>>I shall PM them again for the proof.
>>>Well, its not at all leeched, it has been written by me, completely.
>>>Regarding resale right, i told you, I made it, even the update was there in the other Ebook or what? I decided doing updates even before selling a single copy. Be accusistive, don't be outright blind.
>>> I have answered all questions. Truth Hurts claim that he speaks the truth always. Well, if he does, he shall tell you. I have had multiple chats with him and I have always told him you are always welcome to ask questions, if they are proper questins with no otherwise intentions. Only the comments which were breaking the rules were being deleted. And we don't delete the comments, the staff does. We just report them.
>>>There was a no refund policy from the starting itself. Still I refunded a couple of people in the beginning. I can't go on doing this.
I told ya, accusations are very nice and all. But trust me, you would forget everything if you come this side. At least I still stand by my product and support it, when i can easily close the thread, as I have got no sales for about a month. But I never intended that, and would never do that.
Rest is as I said, upto you, whichever way you want to take it.
---> I'll see them soon.
--->Well all rehashers say this one, I still say that i have the proof that this is rehashed brother+ 3/4 of HF know that this method is an Public one many will testify to this and say that yes, this is an public method.
---> Truth hurts will be in this thread pretty sooner mate.
No sales right because people knew that this was an public method that's why your E-Book you you claim to be yours had a steep downfall in sales pretty much fits the puzzle here.
Guns I hold no personal grudge against you don't ever take me as your enemy, this is my stand against people who do this type of rehashing and stuff.
I'll will be doing this against every e-book author who try to rehash something from someone else without the rights.
(Jun 14, 2011 08:20 AM)Sun Tzu Wrote: ---> I'll see them soon.
--->Well all rehashers say this one, I still say that i have the proof that this is rehashed brother+ 3/4 of HF know that this method is an Public one many will testify to this and say that yes, this is an public method.
---> Truth hurts will be in this thread pretty sooner mate.
No sales right because people knew that this was an public method that's why your E-Book you you claim to be yours had a steep downfall in sales pretty much fits the puzzle here.
Guns I hold no personal grudge against you don't ever take me as your enemy, this is my stand against people who do this type of rehashing and stuff.
I'll will be doing this against every e-book author who try to rehash something from someone else without the rights.
I appreciate it mate. I am not angry even as much as a pinch of salt. As long as you guys are not intentionally flaming, I am okay with it.
And please, this is NOT rehashed. What do you expect me to do? Say that it is rehashed when it is not?
That's the beauty of the whole situation. It reminds me of the movie Shutter Island if you have seen it.
Ask Joey, I wrote the Ebook after consulting him, i told him the method and asked him whether I should make a book or not. I made it only after he said yes.
This book has my language. Look at the v1 and the update. They seem to be written by the same person. That is the way I write. Moreover, I tested it to make sure everything is fine before releasing it. The testing was done almost a month before I released the book. You can look at the testing thread yourself.
Jun 14, 2011 09:50 AM (This post was last modified: Jun 15, 2011 09:13 AM by Sun Tzu.)
(Jun 14, 2011 08:51 AM)VoucherMaster Wrote: I appreciate it mate. I am not angry even as much as a pinch of salt. As long as you guys are not intentionally flaming, I am okay with it.
And please, this is NOT rehashed. What do you expect me to do? Say that it is rehashed when it is not?
That's the beauty of the whole situation. It reminds me of the movie Shutter Island if you have seen it.
Ask Joey, I wrote the Ebook after consulting him, i told him the method and asked him whether I should make a book or not. I made it only after he said yes.
This book has my language. Look at the v1 and the update. They seem to be written by the same person. That is the way I write. Moreover, I tested it to make sure everything is fine before releasing it. The testing was done almost a month before I released the book. You can look at the testing thread yourself.
The proof to as why i stated that your e-book is rehashed,
(Jun 14, 2011 09:50 AM)Sun Tzu Wrote: The proof to as why i stated that your e-book is rehashed,
Code
http://www.#/?d=VZB3DL83
This is my paid copy.👹
Also Joey? he doesn't have any experience in this field so its idiocrisy that you consulted this over with him,You should have preferred some one more knowledgeble like me. Also him being a reviewer here is the greatest joke IMHO he doesn't deserve this.
The Idea may be the same, but the book has been written by me in my language.
More than one people can thing about the same thing, like how algebra was discovered in two different continents by different people, at the same time, who know nothing about each other.
I am not denying the fact the method was present before. I am just saying that it was new to me, and also to the people I it on.
(Jun 14, 2011 09:54 AM)VoucherMaster Wrote: More than one people can thing about the same thing, like how algebra was discovered in two different continents by different people, at the same time, who know nothing about each other.
(Jun 14, 2011 09:54 AM)VoucherMaster Wrote: The Idea may be the same, but the book has been written by me in my language.
More than one people can thing about the same thing, like how algebra was discovered in two different continents by different people, at the same time, who know nothing about each other.
I am not denying the fact the method was present before. I am just saying that it was new to me, and also to the people I it on.
The idea maybe the same? The idea is the same. Written in your language? Rehashing is exclusive to the person who rehashes it that's the ability of a rehasher which is to write another version of something.
In real life yes the algebra stuff works, But on the internet how does it go? Is it the same? It is not so! google, google, google also this is known as the research part you should know to find out if your concept has been out their in the wild,Failing to do so results in pawnage like this. It was new to you? Again that's why i say that you should research it over and over again.
Prosperity you retard havent you ever seen a method like this i mean this is a public method of filling up your own surveys, you don't even know that? What experience in E-Book reviewing do you really have huh? You are just some stupid who doesn't know the ground basics on e-books.
[u Wrote:Lastly, The selection of reviewers,to the E-book reviewers group head.[/u]
You guys should know that almost 90% of the e-book reviewers don't know a cinch about e-books i've seen pretty much lot of shitty reviews being given i mean like they don't know ground basics on E-book reviewing and such they don't even know whether an e-book is rehashed or not clearly if they don't know the above They aren't fit for e-book reviewing in my honest opinion
My favorite part.
Lol, i agree 125%.
Ebook reviews are just a scam.
IMO
OP ownd. Get ready for gang reviewer -rep op , they will do it.
(Jun 14, 2011 10:37 AM)Robbin in the Hood Wrote: My favorite part.
Lol, i agree 125%.
Ebook reviews are just a scam.
IMO
OP ownd. Get ready for gang reviewer -rep op , they will do it.
Everyone will agree to this, -rep i don't care even if 10-15 reviewers come up and Gang rep me given 10*3=30 or 15*3=45 so 30-60 -reps which i really don't care, If i ever cared about -reps i wouldn't have created this thread plus, i'm ready to face what-ever consequences that come my way, plus if they do -rep me it would prove my fact right about shitty reviewers.
If you're trying to say reviewers are useless, I could have told you that. I wrote an eBook that was all fake shit but because it had good grammar and layout, It got a good review.
Sorry for your loss. Lesson learned : Don't buy eBooks.
(Jun 15, 2011 01:11 AM)Industry Wrote: If you're trying to say reviewers are useless, I could have told you that. I wrote an eBook that was all fake shit but because it had good grammar and layout, It got a good review.
Sorry for your loss. Lesson learned : Don't buy eBooks.
Anyone notice how 75% of Guns' rep all come unconditionally from other users claiming Guns to be their "Indian bro"?
All I know is that I'm Indian from now on.
This reminds me of police corruption. Reputation, Ub3r, and a garbage e-book review for a garbage e -book combined with censorship (deleting posts) allowed him to continue his scam. I'm glad Truth Hurts and Heaven<->Hell don't give a damn about reputation and are going out of their way to destroy this kid.
