[Truth Hurts]

I bought this garbage and I look back on it like "WTF did I buy."

LOL nice find.

Is that why you're trying to sell it in the ebook section?

Fail.

---

A lot of reviewers are corrupted they review ebooks and say what its really good but when you buy it you see what is public shitty method.

Sadly, there are NO honest reviewers, it seems anyone with proper grammar and can form full sentences are the ones who are chosen to review.

Its Deja Vu in the market section.

Fucking sick of it.

[Halo 4]

I think every Reviewer should go, and replace them with people who actually know a little something about eBooks and they can tell whether the eBook they are reviewing is a public method.

All this grammar shit etc, is a load of bullshit.

[Dan36]

I think every Reviewer should go, and replace them with people who actually know a little something about eBooks and they can tell whether the eBook they are reviewing is a public method.

All this grammar shit etc, is a load of bullshit.

That's why it so damn ironic. I use to put stock into the official reviews, but now I just see it as some people using wordhippo in order to sound scholarly xD. The reason I put it like that, is they have a part for grammar while one reviewer said his native language isn't even English lmao. Reviewing should go beyond just being in control of the language (which some aren't), but knowing different methods.

I have been in internet marketing for years, primarily CPA and affiliate marketing. The reason I brought up the above is they would save members here so much money if they could call out an author when it's a same public method. When I originally came here I was looking for new methods and everything was basic ideas of things I already knew while reviewers were commending it.

Also, the ironic thing with this eBook is he worded it right off the bat as a basic exploit. Once he started talking about CTR + getting banned it should have been realized that he was talking about doing your own surveys.

That is fraud and if you use a dynamic ip, similar to the one you registered with, they can see the whole dynamic ip pool you have used to complete offers. I think everyone should charge back to try and limit his paypal, but sometimes reading between the lines is critical.

You guys really can't crack him though on it. The reason it's tricky is he said you are buying a CPA exploit. While it's not even an exploit per-say...but a trick to get some credited surveys, it hardly works out on a large scale due to it's sheer nature. However, it's not like he took your money and ran...he still did give you an eBook that detailed how to complete your own surveys.

If there is a rule about not being able to re-write an eBook about public methods...then hell...I should be refunded on just about ever book I have bought from here lol. This should be a learning experience for some people :(

[riwanda]

I think I'll just sell an e-book on how to make $500 a day and instruct people to upload a video on YouTube with a link to their CPA offer. At least it works...

[SIM-599222]

Exactly skype! also they don't have any knowledge on what they review too.

You should start en e-book authenticity group! It could be official, the e-book gets reviewed by 2 reviewers, and then it is given to an authenticity checker.

When the checker makes sure that the e-book is in fact legit, they post that it is legit, if it's not legit, then they post that it is not legit and close the thread.

[SIM-524734]

I very much vouch for this thread... I bought his piece of shit ebook, found out that I can't do it because I don't have a dynamic, then I hired 5 "workers" guess what? Turns out the fucking method doesn't even work! Then I get my license terminated because I was running teamviewer to show my "worker" how to do it...

[sonex]

Hopefully someone posted this, I feel sorry for the ones who actually bought this.

[Sun Tzu]

I think every Reviewer should go, and replace them with people who actually know a little something about eBooks and they can tell whether the eBook they are reviewing is a public method.

All this grammar shit etc, is a load of bullshit.

Exactly! The system is all corrupted you know they think that grammar always rules but they are wrong.

That's why it so damn ironic. I use to put stock into the official reviews, but now I just see it as some people using wordhippo in order to sound scholarly xD. The reason I put it like that, is they have a part for grammar while one reviewer said his native language isn't even English lmao. Reviewing should go beyond just being in control of the language (which some aren't), but knowing different methods.

I have been in internet marketing for years, primarily CPA and affiliate marketing. The reason I brought up the above is they would save members here so much money if they could call out an author when it's a same public method. When I originally came here I was looking for new methods and everything was basic ideas of things I already knew while reviewers were commending it.

Also, the ironic thing with this eBook is he worded it right off the bat as a basic exploit. Once he started talking about CTR + getting banned it should have been realized that he was talking about doing your own surveys.

That is fraud and if you use a dynamic ip, similar to the one you registered with, they can see the whole dynamic ip pool you have used to complete offers. I think everyone should charge back to try and limit his paypal, but sometimes reading between the lines is critical.

You guys really can't crack him though on it. The reason it's tricky is he said you are buying a CPA exploit. While it's not even an exploit per-say...but a trick to get some credited surveys, it hardly works out on a large scale due to it's sheer nature. However, it's not like he took your money and ran...he still did give you an eBook that detailed how to complete your own surveys.

If there is a rule about not being able to re-write an eBook about public methods...then hell...I should be refunded on just about ever book I have bought from here lol. This should be a learning experience for some people :(

The second IM'er to hit this thread 🤝 what you say

Code

"If there is a rule about not being able to re-write an e-book about public methods.... then hell... I should be refunded

I get your point but in the IM'er sense the courses,videos,podcasts we get are something a lot different from here although they use public methods they have crazy, innovative ideas that always click through even though they are public.

Code

I have been in internet marketing for years, primarily CPA and affiliate marketing. The reason I brought up the above is they would  save members here so much money if they could call out an author when it's a same public method. When I originally came here I was looking for new methods and everything was basic ideas of things I already knew while reviewers were commending it.

You can't expect anything from an non-experienced person can you? So is the same with the reviewers here.

You should start en e-book authenticity group! It could be official, the e-book gets reviewed by 2 reviewers, and then it is given to an authenticity checker.

When the checker makes sure that the e-book is in fact legit, they post that it is legit, if it's not legit, then they post that it is not legit and close the thread.

Well basically this is a good idea but considering the time it takes for "Authenticity checker" to investigate on it would be quite time consuming Although this could be averted if there are "Authenticity Checker" type people there in the E-Book Reviewers group meaning knowledgeable people with experience should be there in the e-book reviewers group.

[Cracked]

Why is nobody saying anything about Joey Tribbiani? Correct me If I'm wrong, but isn't he an official reviewer who FULLY supported and promoted Guns N' Roses pathetic excuse for an ebook? I believe he answered customer questions and even sold the ebook himself?

[IMG]http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/6597/loljoey.png[/IMG]

Looks that way to me. An official reviewer saying "I guarantee you won't regret it." I'm sure that helped sales TREMENDOUSLY.

[High Definition]

Why is nobody saying anything about Joey Tribbiani? Correct me If I'm wrong, but isn't he an official reviewer who FULLY supported and promoted Guns N' Roses pathetic excuse for an ebook? I believe he answered customer questions and even sold the ebook himself?

[IMG]http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/6597/loljoey.png[/IMG]

Looks that way to me. An official reviewer saying "I guarantee you won't regret it." I'm sure that helped sales TREMENDOUSLY.

He was not an official reviewer at the time he posted that.

And to those who're just saying bullshit about the group, where is your brain have gone? How you're expecting each person to know everything? Sure the people of the Reviewers group are expected to know the things but why you're expecting them to know everything? At the time Prosperity posted the review, he was just a newbie to the group. It might be mistake on his part to review such expensive E-book at his stage but people talking shit about COMPLETE group is not tolerable.

If you'll see like that, every reviewer will be found guilty of posting a non accurate review at some point. That is the reason why the default number of reviews has been made 2 so as to increase the accuracy. Most of the time, the thread starter just includes the good review and ignores the bad one. It happened to me lots of time but what can I do? I've no power to ask them to include my review also. Here it comes to reader discretion to browse through all the pages and read both the reviews.

No one can accuse the group to give inaccurate reviews every time but you must understand that giving accurate reviews every time is not just possible. We're also humans and we'll surely make mistakes. What we try to do is keep them minimum.

[Truth Hurts]

Joey T only became a reviewer a week ago, nonetheless, I don't blame you.

He was part of the stupid ebook.

[Joey Tribbiani]

Why is nobody saying anything about Joey Tribbiani? Correct me If I'm wrong, but isn't he an official reviewer who FULLY supported and promoted Guns N' Roses pathetic excuse for an ebook? I believe he answered customer questions and even sold the ebook himself?

[IMG]http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/6597/loljoey.png[/IMG]

Looks that way to me. An official reviewer saying "I guarantee you won't regret it." I'm sure that helped sales TREMENDOUSLY.

I became an official reviewer only a week ago. Also, I have listed my reasons for supporting the ebook to heaven hell. You can read it on Guns' sale thread as well.
Also, I did not take part in writing the ebook, neither did I sell it myself. I was only for support i.e if the customers had any questions regarding the method.

[Cracked]

I became an official reviewer only a week ago. Also, I have listed my reasons for supporting the ebook to heaven hell. You can read it on Guns' sale thread as well.
Also, I did not take part in writing the ebook, neither did I sell it myself. I was only for support i.e if the customers had any questions regarding the method.

Alright, thanks for clearing that up. I wasn't trying to bash you, I was simply asking a question. Don't take it the wrong way.

[Sun Tzu]

He was not an official reviewer at the time he posted that.

And to those who're just saying bullshit about the group, where is your brain have gone? How you're expecting each person to know everything? Sure the people of the Reviewers group are expected to know the things but why you're expecting them to know everything? At the time Prosperity posted the review, he was just a newbie to the group. It might be mistake on his part to review such expensive E-book at his stage but people talking shit about COMPLETE group is not tolerable.

If you'll see like that, every reviewer will be found guilty of posting a non accurate review at some point. That is the reason why the default number of reviews has been made 2 so as to increase the accuracy. Most of the time, the thread starter just includes the good review and ignores the bad one. It happened to me lots of time but what can I do? I've no power to ask them to include my review also. Here it comes to reader discretion to browse through all the pages and read both the reviews.

No one can accuse the group to give inaccurate reviews every time but you must understand that giving accurate reviews every time is not just possible. We're also humans and we'll surely make mistakes. What we try to do is keep them minimum.

Code

And to those who're just saying bullshit about the group, where is your brain have gone? How you're expecting each person to know everything? Sure the people of the Reviewers group are expected to know the things but why you're expecting them to know everything?

I'm not expecting you guys to know about cooking i'm expecting you guys to know about E-Book Is that hard? If you guys don't even have the Brain to research whether the E-Book has been rehashed or uses any other previous method that are posted in public then for what the hell are you guys even there in the reviewers group

Code

At the time Prosperity posted the review, he was just a newbie to the group. It might be mistake on his part to review such expensive E-book at his stage but people talking shit about COMPLETE group is not tolerable.

Newbie? get real your "Reviewer" Just let a guy scam people for $75 for a copy each you think that's cool? I'd pose a question to you Would allow a "newbie-who doesn't have any knowledge" to ride a plane(i.e) would you let him pilot the plane? would you? with your relatives your family and all? And what happens if he steers the plane into hill and crashes the plane all your family members die(This is just a very imaginatory situation this situation is just said so as you feel the pain of what others feel this story is not meant to hurt you but show just you the feelings that most of us have for this idiotic system) And the officials from the management comes over to say "We are sorry that your family died We just let a Newbie ride the plane so sorry" How would you feel to hear stuff like this from them huh?

Code

If you'll see like that, every reviewer will be found guilty of posting a non accurate review at some point. That is the reason why the default number of reviews has been made 2 so as to increase the accuracy. Most of the time, the thread starter just includes the good review and ignores the bad one. It happened to me lots of time but what can I do? I've no power to ask them to include my review also. Here it comes to reader discretion to browse through all the pages and read both the reviews.

First part of reply, My answer to you: You guys should be accurate that's what reviewing is supposed to be. With every inaccuracy you are making waste to people who might just buy it if you understand that
Secong part, I do agree you only can do your best the rest is up to the buyers.

Code

No one can accuse the group to give inaccurate reviews every time but you must understand that giving accurate reviews every time is not just possible. We're also humans and we'll surely make mistakes. What we try to do is keep them minimum.

Not me but the buyers are entitled to accuse the bullshit review by the "reviewers" and you can't deny it. Keeping it minimum? You can totally eradicate it by keeping knowledgeable people who really know about E-Books that where the cure for your group really lies, Rather than having people who like write in absolute splendid english and have no knowledge on e-books. You can make mistake is some other things but here you are wasting the money of people who take reviews on an e-book greatly so your "Reviewers" here and their reviews matter a lot.

Want i put forth here is that the system of recruitment of the reviewers has to change for the good Take in people who are as knowledgeable in E-Books not just some people who could just spit out fluid english. Only then would these "Mistakes" you say will be totally eradicated.

[Stonehelm]

I've just opened a PayPal dispute. I suggest everyone else who got scammed out of 75$ do the same.