Sep 3, 2011 08:48 AM
(This post was last modified: Dec 9, 2013 04:57 AM by SpriteZ.)
thanks for viruz tho bro..thanks alot
thanks for these tools mate..also..thanks for scanning them
Thankss even though i never used it ,and isit Virusfree and isit even any good for taking down sitess considering its just a DoS program,and Op your STUPID FOR Relasing it for SOO Manyyy leacherrs,just say Post and PM me Durr
But nicee share though :)
Thanks for not knowing the difference from DoS and DDoS.
Thanks for not knowing the difference from DoS and DDoS.
Also thanks for posting public tools.
(Sep 3, 2011 10:37 AM)loki` Wrote: Thanks for not knowing the difference from DoS and DDoS.
Also thanks for posting public tools.
LOL. I post them as DOS tools - No replies, nobody's interested.
Change it to DDOS and 0mfg err'ybody iz n0w g0nna h4x.
Also, most tools posted here are public, idiot.
Sep 3, 2011 12:44 PM
(This post was last modified: Sep 3, 2011 12:45 PM by V3xD.)
All clean uploads.. i tested them all in a VM, good thread!
thanks for .. bro..thanks alot
thanks for .. bro..thanks alot
he dude thx do you have some thing that boot people off xbox?
(Sep 3, 2011 12:52 PM)millionstylo Wrote: he dude thx do you have some thing that boot people off xbox?
Buy a shell booter from the Marketplace.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Nice share.
Please post more EXTREME Good Dossers. Thanks Alot!
Isnt LOIC a weak tool? It was used by a lot of people attacking the same website at the same time
These are L-DoSing tools not ddos
L-DoSing aka DoSing
Low-rate Denial-of-Service attacks
Recently a new kind of DoS attack, Low-rate Denial-of-Service (LDoS) attack, has been proposed that exploits TCP’s retransmission timeout mechanism to reduce TCP throughput without being detected. Compared to traditional flooding based Denial-of-Service attacks, the low-rate DoS attack does not employ a “sledge-hammer” approach of high-rate transmission of packets, and consequently eludes detection.[9] These kinds of attacks are also called shrew attacks, Pulsing DoS (PDoS) attacks, and Reduction of Quality (RoQ) attacks. Recent Publications in low-rate Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks
The Low-rate DoS (LDoS) attack exploits TCP’s slow-time-scale dynamics of retransmission time-out (RTO) mechanisms to reduce TCP throughput. Basically, an attacker can cause a TCP flow to repeatedly enter a RTO state by sending high-rate, but short-duration bursts, and repeating periodically at slower RTO time-scales. The TCP throughput at the attacked node will be significantly reduced while the attacker will have low average rate making it difficult to be detected.[9]
-
DDoS
Distributed attack
Split-arrows.svg
It has been suggested that some portions of this article be split into a new article titled Distributed denial-of-service attack. (September 2011)
A distributed denial of service attack (DDoS) occurs when multiple systems flood the bandwidth or resources of a targeted system, usually one or more web servers. These systems are compromised by attackers using a variety of methods.
Malware can carry DDoS attack mechanisms; one of the better-known examples of this was MyDoom. Its DoS mechanism was triggered on a specific date and time. This type of DDoS involved hardcoding the target IP address prior to release of the malware and no further interaction was necessary to launch the attack.
A system may also be compromised with a trojan, allowing the attacker to download a zombie agent (or the trojan may contain one). Attackers can also break into systems using automated tools that exploit flaws in programs that listen for connections from remote hosts. This scenario primarily concerns systems acting as servers on the web.
Stacheldraht is a classic example of a DDoS tool. It utilizes a layered structure where the attacker uses a client program to connect to handlers, which are compromised systems that issue commands to the zombie agents, which in turn facilitate the DDoS attack. Agents are compromised via the handlers by the attacker, using automated routines to exploit vulnerabilities in programs that accept remote connections running on the targeted remote hosts. Each handler can control up to a thousand agents.[13]
These collections of systems compromisers are known as botnets. DDoS tools like Stacheldraht still use classic DoS attack methods centered on IP spoofing and amplification like smurf attacks and fraggle attacks (these are also known as bandwidth consumption attacks). SYN floods (also known as resource starvation attacks) may also be used. Newer tools can use DNS servers for DoS purposes. See next section.
Simple attacks such as SYN floods may appear with a wide range of source IP addresses, giving the appearance of a well distributed DoS. These flood attacks do not require completion of the TCP three way handshake and attempt to exhaust the destination SYN queue or the server bandwidth. Because the source IP addresses can be trivially spoofed, an attack could come from a limited set of sources, or may even originate from a single host. Stack enhancements such as syn cookies may be effective mitigation against SYN queue flooding, however complete bandwidth exhaustion may require involvement.[further explanation needed]
Unlike MyDoom's DDoS mechanism, botnets can be turned against any IP address. Script kiddies use them to deny the availability of well known websites to legitimate users.[14] More sophisticated attackers use DDoS tools for the purposes of extortion — even against their business rivals.[15]
It is important to note the difference between a DDoS and DoS attack. If an attacker mounts an attack from a single host it would be classified as a DoS attack. In fact, any attack against availability would be classed as a Denial of Service attack. On the other hand, if an attacker uses many systems to simultaneously launch attacks against a remote host, this would be classified as a DDoS attack.
The major advantages to an attacker of using a distributed denial-of-service attack are that multiple machines can generate more attack traffic than one machine, multiple attack machines are harder to turn off than one attack machine, and that the behavior of each attack machine can be stealthier, making it harder to track down and shut down. These attacker advantages cause challenges for defense mechanisms. For example, merely purchasing more incoming bandwidth than the current volume of the attack might not help, because the attacker might be able to simply add more attack machines.
It should be noted that in some cases a machine may become part of a DDoS attack with the owner's consent. An example of this is the 2010 DDoS attack against major credit card companies by supporters of WikiLeaks. In cases such as this, supporters of a movement (in this case, those opposing the arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange) choose to download and run DDoS software.
There now you know the difference.
(Sep 4, 2011 08:26 AM)Ups. Wrote: These are L-DoSing tools not ddos
L-DoSing aka DoSing
Low-rate Denial-of-Service attacks
Recently a new kind of DoS attack, Low-rate Denial-of-Service (LDoS) attack, has been proposed that exploits TCP’s retransmission timeout mechanism to reduce TCP throughput without being detected. Compared to traditional flooding based Denial-of-Service attacks, the low-rate DoS attack does not employ a “sledge-hammer” approach of high-rate transmission of packets, and consequently eludes detection.[9] These kinds of attacks are also called shrew attacks, Pulsing DoS (PDoS) attacks, and Reduction of Quality (RoQ) attacks. Recent Publications in low-rate Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks
The Low-rate DoS (LDoS) attack exploits TCP’s slow-time-scale dynamics of retransmission time-out (RTO) mechanisms to reduce TCP throughput. Basically, an attacker can cause a TCP flow to repeatedly enter a RTO state by sending high-rate, but short-duration bursts, and repeating periodically at slower RTO time-scales. The TCP throughput at the attacked node will be significantly reduced while the attacker will have low average rate making it difficult to be detected.[9]
-
DDoS
Distributed attack
Split-arrows.svg
It has been suggested that some portions of this article be split into a new article titled Distributed denial-of-service attack. (September 2011)
A distributed denial of service attack (DDoS) occurs when multiple systems flood the bandwidth or resources of a targeted system, usually one or more web servers. These systems are compromised by attackers using a variety of methods.
Malware can carry DDoS attack mechanisms; one of the better-known examples of this was MyDoom. Its DoS mechanism was triggered on a specific date and time. This type of DDoS involved hardcoding the target IP address prior to release of the malware and no further interaction was necessary to launch the attack.
A system may also be compromised with a trojan, allowing the attacker to download a zombie agent (or the trojan may contain one). Attackers can also break into systems using automated tools that exploit flaws in programs that listen for connections from remote hosts. This scenario primarily concerns systems acting as servers on the web.
Stacheldraht is a classic example of a DDoS tool. It utilizes a layered structure where the attacker uses a client program to connect to handlers, which are compromised systems that issue commands to the zombie agents, which in turn facilitate the DDoS attack. Agents are compromised via the handlers by the attacker, using automated routines to exploit vulnerabilities in programs that accept remote connections running on the targeted remote hosts. Each handler can control up to a thousand agents.[13]
These collections of systems compromisers are known as botnets. DDoS tools like Stacheldraht still use classic DoS attack methods centered on IP spoofing and amplification like smurf attacks and fraggle attacks (these are also known as bandwidth consumption attacks). SYN floods (also known as resource starvation attacks) may also be used. Newer tools can use DNS servers for DoS purposes. See next section.
Simple attacks such as SYN floods may appear with a wide range of source IP addresses, giving the appearance of a well distributed DoS. These flood attacks do not require completion of the TCP three way handshake and attempt to exhaust the destination SYN queue or the server bandwidth. Because the source IP addresses can be trivially spoofed, an attack could come from a limited set of sources, or may even originate from a single host. Stack enhancements such as syn cookies may be effective mitigation against SYN queue flooding, however complete bandwidth exhaustion may require involvement.[further explanation needed]
Unlike MyDoom's DDoS mechanism, botnets can be turned against any IP address. Script kiddies use them to deny the availability of well known websites to legitimate users.[14] More sophisticated attackers use DDoS tools for the purposes of extortion — even against their business rivals.[15]
It is important to note the difference between a DDoS and DoS attack. If an attacker mounts an attack from a single host it would be classified as a DoS attack. In fact, any attack against availability would be classed as a Denial of Service attack. On the other hand, if an attacker uses many systems to simultaneously launch attacks against a remote host, this would be classified as a DDoS attack.
The major advantages to an attacker of using a distributed denial-of-service attack are that multiple machines can generate more attack traffic than one machine, multiple attack machines are harder to turn off than one attack machine, and that the behavior of each attack machine can be stealthier, making it harder to track down and shut down. These attacker advantages cause challenges for defense mechanisms. For example, merely purchasing more incoming bandwidth than the current volume of the attack might not help, because the attacker might be able to simply add more attack machines.
It should be noted that in some cases a machine may become part of a DDoS attack with the owner's consent. An example of this is the 2010 DDoS attack against major credit card companies by supporters of WikiLeaks. In cases such as this, supporters of a movement (in this case, those opposing the arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange) choose to download and run DDoS software.
There now you know the difference.
I know, but like I posted earlier - People aren't interested if you don't call them 'DDoS' tools.
|
