[Mr. Anderson]

OP trying to act as if he knows what he's talking about after the fiasco in the protection thread...

95% polymorphic.. you have to be fucking kidding me.

Whats hilarious about it? You obviously don't know what you are talking about. 95% of my code is different, 5% remains the same. Come back when you learn your coding skills.

---

Thank you.
Now lets start that all over again.
How did you estimate the difference? Did it include anything but your code? If so it is flawed and you shouldn't advertise it that way because essentially you are lying.

I compared the code of two stubs to each other using the ubuntu utility. out of all the lines, only 3 out of the total amount were the same.

[Io0oI]

95% of my code is different, 5% remains the same.

I compared the code of two stubs to each other using the ubuntu utility. out of all the lines, only 3 out of the total amount were the same.

anti-virus companys will take the 5% as a signature
.net languages are easy to decompile just like java.
It is Like someone who provide 95% stub updates for his customers
It will be useless

[Mr. Anderson]

anti-virus companys will take the 5% as a signature
.net languages are easy to decompile just like java.
It is Like someone who provide 95% stub updates for his customers
It will be useless

The 5% is not always the same code, its still randomized. If it gets detected, I will add updated. And remember, the stub re-assembles itself every-time it is run.

[van1lle]

Fine, I got rid of the polymorphic part, I'll just say that each stub is 95% unique. Way to much trouble.

Thanks Mr. Anderson for being reasonable. Now everything is fine in my eyes. 👍

---

The 5% is not always the same code, its still randomized. If it gets detected, I will add updated. And remember, the stub re-assembles itself every-time it is run.

At least you don't call if polymorphic anymore.

[Splodge0007]

Whats hilarious about it? You obviously don't know what you are talking about. 95% of my code is different, 5% remains the same. Come back when you learn your coding skills.

Interesting how you had to change your thread title and remove your "Polymorphism" claims before you chose to confront me about that.

I mean, you've coded a "Polymorphic" crypter and you've only just realized it isn't "Polymorphic". That my young idiot, is the hilarious part.

Unless of course you aren't coding it yourself 🤐 🤐🤐

[Io0oI]

The 5% is not always the same code, its still randomized.

5% remains the same

you cant be sure it is not always the same code !

the stub re-assembles itself every-time it is run.

If you mean by this the stub will disasembles itself,changes the assembly instructions and reassembles itself,then you have a polymorphic stub witch you dont
If you mean the crypter have a number of totaly different stubs,like 30 decrypters that will be generated randomly , then you have an oligomorphic engine,it could be easely realised in any language,so instead of looking for one stub an antivirus software will look for all the stubs.That will make it hard to detect your malware.
If you mean the crypter encrypt the stub randomly using a key or an algorithm to cause different encrypted stubs,then you have a simple obfuscator,and antivirus software will look for the static part in this case the key or the encryption algorithm.

why care about what techniques are used or the "95% new output" ,in a market palce such HF's,people only care about fud,it does not matter how you did that,you can code a simple PE packer and it will do the job,people who care about polymorphic and similar shit are definitely not the people who want to spend 10-100$ on a crypter.
people here only care about dependencies and countinous FUD
make that and you will not need to ask for "good luck/look's legit.." suport posts.people love to get what they paid for,
nothing more,nothing less

[wyterzzz]

You will never learn that polymorphism != polymorphic. Those who say polymorphism instead of polymorphic have no idea what they are talking about. Polymorphism is technique used in OOP -> e.g. Animal a = new Cat().
//Excuse me for b-u-m-p-ing such an old thread but I didn't see the date...

[Mr. Anderson]

This project is closed and not being developed since I sold the source. Don't .