[xVulnerable]

So i've had two butthurt kids that decided to leave me a rep accusing me of infecting members.

1: .Rive


I asked him via PM what he was talking about, he said was talking about a product i'm selling.
The only product i'm selling which can cause a trojan would be my survey locker. Funny thing is i never sold my locker to this guy.
Even if i had, "dropped a trojan in sandbox" ? It's a fucking malware what do you expect it to drop?

Any how this doesn't make sense, the user is obviously butthurt and accusing me of infecting members without any proof what so ever, just to make me look bad.

2:. Dillusionist


Oh this kid...he was reselling my Ebook and i discovered he was doing so after a week or so and got his thread closed followed by a scam report by one of his buyers who notified me about this.
View the scam report here https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...ht=2068152
Obviously he hates me now for getting his thread closed, a scam report which led to some neg reps so he decided to say i infect members. LOL.

I'm not crying because of a neg rep, what i hate about this is that when somebody views my rep and see those 2 reps right there, will think i actually did try to infect members.

I think there should be a rule for this or something just like you can't say a user is a scammer unless followed with a scam report.

[Truth]

Its just there opinion of you. As for scamming you can't rep without a scam report. What we need is to be able to junk more threads

[xVulnerable]

Its just there opinion of you. As for scamming you can't rep without a scam report. What we need is to be able to junk more threads

No. Saying someone did something what they didn't really do is definitely not an opinion, it's a lie.

[Wheezy Gang]

Sadly I don't think this breaks any rules on HF. Anyway I doubt any actions will be taken ever since JD stopped doing rep abuse

[Fredo Santana]

I'm not sure if this breaks a policy tbh if it does OMNI would definately take care of it.

[♥Starfire♥]

I don't think that this officially breaks any rules to be completely honest, but one of the staff might do something about this because it implies that YOU would have broken a rule. :)

[xhflhkeuhwguu34]

The reputation shown in this thread breaks zero site policies.

[TheBlackHat]

This rep will not be removed, so deal with it.

[Trundle™]

You're allowed to report this, even though it is highly unlikely it'll actually result in it being removed.

A user did something like this to me, saying I was LQ and sketchy, just because I didn't want to deal with him. I was the one going first in the deal and my rep was all positives, he had about 60% negative saying he was a scammer.

Some ratings are bullshit.

[Appliance Warehouse]

you have to realize that when u make these threads, that butthurt fag and all of his buttbudies are going to come here and post 'un-biased' threads about how you are wrong.
You must learn to accept that people on HF are little kids and must not be trusted. Look at my rep, I've made thousands of $ selling a product, and some fag and his buttbudies come around and say im a scammer. They also happened to have donated money to Judge Dredd. I get rep fucked. Welcome to HF

That's why I don't trust HF anymore.

[VRUMM]

I support this as well as it is really people abusing rep

I think there should be a rule for this or something just like you can't say a user is a scammer unless followed with a scam report

[Roger Waters]

There should be a rule where you need to provide proof that a user is infecting users, otherwise the rep is invalid.

[Demoz]

There should be a rule where you need to provide proof that a user is infecting users, otherwise the rep is invalid.

I agree. These are such bold statements, and can push away anyone attempting to deal with these users, it should have evidence backing it up.

[xVulnerable]

There should be a rule where you need to provide proof that a user is infecting users, otherwise the rep is invalid.

Exactly, this is exactly like accusing someone to be a scammer but instead you're accusing the user of infecting, which basically has the same effect.

[BLURRYFΛCE]

OP, why did you put "DEAL WITH CAUTION" in the reputation you gave to .Rive? Have you guys ever dealt before? If you haven't, then you're just as bad.