Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

[Guide] Full list of RELIABLE Minecraft hosts

(Aug 18, 2014 11:19 AM)afk0 Wrote:  I can vouch for SoYouStart, used them for all of my servers and they are the definition of swag.

My only problem so far is that they are taking forever to get back in stock. I am waiting for SYS-IP-2 and god damn they are taking there time...
I've been using Cloud Frost for a while now, and have experienced little to NO errors or issues.

I'd consider them somewhere up top. However, this is more of a personal opinion.

EDIT: However, I must add. One thing I do agree with you is that... Uhh... GGServers is absolute shit. I'd honestly have better luck running my MC server from a potato.
GGservers is one of the worst hosts, remove them from the list please.
Thanks for moving McProHosting down to Moderate/Medium Quality. I agree with everything on the current list aside from CreeperHost. I've never had a single problem with CreeperHost. They charge for support, but its good support (Edit: I don't think they do this anymore, I checked on their site and didn't see anything about it). They'll take care of you and fix you up, but I've kept a small FTB server for myself and some friends with them for almost a year now. And I've never had any problems with them. I've also used FragNet in the past. Their support is 7/10, but if you know what you're doing, they're 10/10. FragNet and Creeperhost are the only two places I recommend to people.
If youre from the UK i would recommend Nitrous Networks

They're a proper hosting company who have just got a new data center.
They have thousands of customers over here in the UK area but they also have a Canadian branch.
The average user submitted ticket is answered and resolved in 40 something seconds.
Definitely a good UK host.
I would suggest moving Beastnode down to Medium Quality, they flopped when our server got DDoS'd, they just null'd our server and didn't help us any further. Response tickets took about 24-48hours even with their large support staff.

Would not recommend using them. Especially with $12 a gig.
Fragnet is a much better choice at that pricing.
l0l, GGServers was put in the correct position xD, But I think you should add "https://hosthavoc.com/"
(Aug 19, 2014 11:40 AM)FreakSec Wrote:  l0l, GGServers was put in the correct position xD, But I think you should add "https://hosthavoc.com/"

Host Havoc was personally one of the worst hosts I've ever had. I'm not trying to bash on his service but damn was it laggy, Oversold "My server didn't have enough memory to start for about 2 days", I wouldn't recommend them.
[Image: gMFyr22.gif]

(Aug 19, 2014 11:40 AM)FreakSec Wrote:  l0l, GGServers was put in the correct position xD, But I think you should add "https://hosthavoc.com/"

added host havoc to LQ hosts because of what the user said below. Feel free to argue.
I used Beastnode. Their CPUs are very weak (or are over shared). They are good for around 40 players, after that, TPS goes low.
Put GGServers in the Terrible section.
They suck.
Thanks for this. I'm debating whether to buy Fragnet, or beastnode which has free DDoS protection.
(Aug 19, 2014 08:41 PM)Trey_ Wrote:  Thanks for this. I'm debating whether to buy Fragnet, or beastnode which has free DDoS protection.

Most hosts should offer this completely free of charge.
[Image: gMFyr22.gif]

(Aug 20, 2014 01:32 AM)LighterFluid Wrote:  Most hosts should offer this completely free of charge.

Most of the nodes they buy charge. If they are good IMO, they get OVH.
Great thread, very useful and just simply formatted. :) Make updates over time if you deem it necessary. Don't let this thread die guys, members of the Minecraft HF community will find it useful.


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
[Quantum] by RsyncedFeb 13, 2026 06:27 PM 50 1,604 Feb 13, 2026 06:27 PM
Last Post: Rsynced
by LufasuDec 26, 2016 09:43 AM 2 460 Dec 26, 2016 09:43 AM
Last Post: 22 Savage
by Elite_xSep 23, 2016 07:29 PM 0 131 Sep 23, 2016 07:29 PM
Last Post: Elite_x