[Talk] Share your protection setup |
(Nov 17, 2014 11:52 AM)'An0ny Wrote: Antivirus : ESET Smart Security. You don't have to use the beta version of Chrome 64-bits, there's a stable build out. Also I would add more extensions. Fiat justitia ruat cælum
My era of providing technical support and malware removal on HackForums is over, so you can stop PM'ing me about it. Sorry. 
Nov 17, 2014 04:12 PM
(This post was last modified: Nov 17, 2014 04:15 PM by UnPluggedToaster.)
Antivirus : ESET Smart Security/Webroot Internet Security.
Firewall : ESET Smart Security/Webroot again. Antimalware : Malewarebytes premium/Hitman Pro Protection Utilities : Microsoft Emet/Zemana Anti-Keylogger Free/Kali linux :D, Cisco Vpn Services, true crypt, Sandboxie, Wireshark Web Browser : Chrome BETA 64bit Web Browser Extensions/Addons : Adblock Plus, Last Pass, Trusteer Rapport Endpoint Protection, Http everywhere, Disconnect, WoT, Classic Pop up blocker, No script Call me paranoid, but at least im somewhat safe :D (Nov 17, 2014 04:12 PM)UnPluggedToaster Wrote: Antivirus : ESET Smart Security/Webroot Internet Security. You should never use two Antiviruses at the same time. Uninstall Webroot Internet Security. It's worth nothing compared to an ESET product. For your Google Chrome, no need to use the beta build since there's a stable 64-bits build. Also, I don't know why Kali Linux count as a protection utility ? Fiat justitia ruat cælum
My era of providing technical support and malware removal on HackForums is over, so you can stop PM'ing me about it. Sorry.
Nov 17, 2014 04:23 PM
(This post was last modified: Nov 17, 2014 04:24 PM by UnPluggedToaster.)
Webroot is built to work with other anti viruses, at least that is what they advertise. I also like webroot cause it doesnt rely on definitions but instead analyzes how the program may behave. I use kali for its forensics tools and teaching myself possible ways to infect and attack computers.
PS. Never knew there was a stable build. THX :D (Nov 17, 2014 04:23 PM)UnPluggedToaster Wrote: Webroot is built to work with other anti viruses, at least that is what they advertise. I also like webroot cause it doesnt rely on definitions but instead analyzes how the program may behave. I use kali for its forensics tools and teaching myself possible ways to infect and attack computers. This is what you call "behavorial analysis/engine". Every Antiviruses have one (every good ones at least). Well Kali Linux doesn't count as a protection utility then. Fiat justitia ruat cælum
My era of providing technical support and malware removal on HackForums is over, so you can stop PM'ing me about it. Sorry. (Nov 17, 2014 12:02 PM)Aura Wrote: You don't have to use the beta version of Chrome 64-bits, there's a stable build out. Also I would add more extensions. I tried the stable one and it does not have that "multi-person-mode" or whatever to call it. Where I can swap mails easily to also swap browsing history. Why would you suggest me to add more extensions? Like what? I've never been infected in my life so I feel I am pretty safe. Well, I don't download programs usually - When I do i run them in sandboxie or virtuale. (Nov 17, 2014 06:54 PM)'An0ny Wrote: I tried the stable one and it does not have that "multi-person-mode" or whatever to call it. Where I can swap mails easily to also swap browsing history. I forgot about that multi user mode, I wonder when they'll release it in a stable version. And mostly to block infections at the source since a browser is an open door for malware and make your whole browsing experience more safe and secure. Fiat justitia ruat cælum
My era of providing technical support and malware removal on HackForums is over, so you can stop PM'ing me about it. Sorry.
Antivirus : Avira AntiVirus
Firewall : Comodo Firewall Antimalware : Malware Bytes Premium & Anti-Exploit Protection Utilities : Web Browser : Chrome 32 Bit (I think idk. It uses 32bit java so i assume its 32bit) Web Browser Extensions/Addons : Https Everywhere, Adblock Others : CCLeaner, Defraggler (Nov 19, 2014 05:26 AM)@Instagram Wrote: Antivirus : Avira AntiVirus If you use a 64-bits version of Windows, you can use the 64-bits version of Google Chrome, it's better suited for your system. Fiat justitia ruat cælum
My era of providing technical support and malware removal on HackForums is over, so you can stop PM'ing me about it. Sorry.
Nov 19, 2014 11:15 AM
(This post was last modified: Nov 19, 2014 11:15 AM by BLURRYFΛCE.)
Antivirus : Avast Free Antivirus (Installed it recently after Xpaj rootkit false positive scared me straight!)
Firewall : None. Antimalware : None. Protection Utilities : None. Web Browser : Google Chrome 64-bit (Primary browser.) // Mozilla Firefox 64-bit (Need it for everything that Chrome can't handle.) // Opera 64-bit (Need it for Opera Turbo.) // Internet Explorer 32-bit & 64-bit (Need it for cookie injection.) Web Browser Extensions/Addons :
Others : CCleaner (For cleaning LSO cookies, don't ask me why.) (Nov 19, 2014 01:20 PM)Aura Wrote: How do you like uBlock ? Did you create your own set of rules ?Yes and yes, that's why I love µBlock, for it's simplicity and the fact it's much more optimized than AdBlock Plus. (Nov 19, 2014 01:28 PM)BLURRYFΛCE Wrote: Yes and yes, that's why I love µBlock, for it's simplicity and the fact it's much more optimized than AdBlock Plus. I guess I could try to put Adblock and AdBlock Plus on hold for a moment to give uBlock a shot. Fiat justitia ruat cælum
My era of providing technical support and malware removal on HackForums is over, so you can stop PM'ing me about it. Sorry. |
|
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||
| Thread / Author | Replies | Views | Last Post |
| by Laughing ManDec 12, 2023 06:30 PM | 26 | 894 |
Dec 12, 2023 06:30 PM Last Post: Laughing Man |
| by BruleMar 3, 2014 07:55 AM | 8 | 218 |
Mar 3, 2014 07:55 AM Last Post: phybeя |
| by YuukoApr 26, 2012 11:10 AM | 10 | 238 |
Apr 26, 2012 11:10 AM Last Post: RUS7Y |
