[BubbleDoo]

you can NOT call it a bruteforcer because it is not one. Period!

if you think this is even close to a brutforcer, then you need to go read a little about what you think a bruteforcer is.

I haven't checked the source, so I can't really judge but if it tests multiple email:pass combinations it's actually a form of bruteforcing. Bruteforcing can use multiple words (like a dictionary(AKA Dictionary Attack which also falls under the bruteforcing branch)) or a counting system like a, aa, aaa, aab, abb, etc etc or a combination of that e.g hello, hello1, hello11, hello111, hello112, hello122, etc etc (like the original Bruteforcing way).

So yeah, I can't judge but from what I hear here in this thread it seems quite similar to a bruteforcer. Could be wrong though :)

EDIT: I was still at the first page when writting this reply which I now see is basically already pointed out on the 2nd page. So this post is rather useless :P
Also @Nivarka real Bruteforcing takes longer, but gives a way higher chance to crack a password as it tests all possible combi's whilst a dictionary attack only checks existing words (which alot of people use, but smart people don't) and yeah, as I pointed out, a combination of these is good aswell, alot of people tempt to put some numbers behind their password when it's a word.

[Odus]

In which case a dictionary atack is far superior and more likely to work in the majority of cases.

What? Try and guess my real name. It could be Kyle, Osama, Robert, Adolf, anything. Assuming you do get the name right, how do you know you've got the spelling down? It could be Sean or Shaun, Stuart or Stewart. Maybe I have weird caps so it could be BoB not Bob or I could have accents. You have no clue.

The only way a dictionary attack would be 'superior' is under the assumption that the correct answer lies within your precompiled wordlist. A brute force would exhaust every possible combination and therefore would (eventually) arrive at the correct answer/password/whatever. Does this make sense or..?

[SIM-1676753]

In which case a dictionary atack is far superior and more likely to work in the majority of cases.

Right. It'd be more "to the point" than a bruteforce. Like if you're targeting people that play minecraft. You will probably get a lot more accounts if you use a wordlist related to minecraft.

[Mr. Carter]

you can NOT call it a bruteforcer because it is not one. Period!

if you think this is even close to a brutforcer, then you need to go read a little about what you think a bruteforcer is.

loooool? Then change it lol, you have a base right there, its more pain in the ass to check a username and password list than loading a combo list, and the name says it right in the picture lol "Cracker".

[nathan72389]

loooool? Then change it lol, you have a base right there, its more pain in the ass to check a username and password list than loading a combo list, and the name says it right in the picture lol "Cracker".

change it?
I dont want it, i was just pointing out that you are wrong.
if i wanted a shitty source than i would download yours.

[еlixir]

Code

Control.CheckForIllegalCrossThreadCalls = False

Really?

HAHAHA oh i remember those days.

Here you go OP and everyone who needs this.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18730...them-acros

[Mr. Carter]

change it?
I dont want it, i was just pointing out that you are wrong.
if i wanted a shitty source than i would download yours.

I never pointed that it was Bruteforcer, I said its kinda since you can easily change it to check username and password lists. It would not be hard to load 2 lists, make the crack code go,

Code

For each username as string in usernames
for each password as string in passwords
'blabla
next
next

that's to pointing out my "kinda like" word in the you can change.