(May 14, 2015 10:13 AM)Joshz Wrote: Looks nice. I feel deal disputes should account for half of the score though. They're definitely the biggest thing.
Updated (Click to View)
![[Image: ffbWT1F.png]](https://i.imgur.com/ffbWT1F.png)
Made it out of 100.
![[Image: vjPWhyy.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/vjPWhyy.gif)
Trust Scan Released |
|
Updated (Click to View) Made it out of 100. 
I think I found a glitch in it, was looking at a members and it says he has 0 unique IPs
Spoiler (Click to View)  (May 14, 2015 10:05 AM)$lick Wrote: Been messing around with this and creating my own stuff (Click to View) Did you create a userscript for that? (May 14, 2015 10:30 AM)Patrick Jane Wrote: Did you create a userscript for that? Yeah I did, I doubt I'm going to release it though.  (May 14, 2015 10:37 AM)$lick Wrote: Yeah I did, I doubt I'm going to release it though. Can I ? I'll add it to my already released userscript and give you credits. Thanks, Quote:I think I found a glitch in it, was looking at a members and it says he has 0 unique IPs Is that a user awaiting activation? I think I'll make an error for those searches. @lazy. Please don't release that script. In all honesty the deal disputes should not be 50% and any official Trust Score I will create myself with a proper formula. (May 14, 2015 01:30 PM)Omniscient Wrote: Is that a user awaiting activation? I think I'll make an error for those searches. I set it too 100, but yeah I wasn't planning on releasing it. (May 14, 2015 01:30 PM)Omniscient Wrote: Is that a user awaiting activation? I think I'll make an error for those searches. He was a normal member with 42 posts, can't find him now. Althought it seems to heppen with newer members with low post counts. (May 14, 2015 11:20 PM)Nakamoto. Wrote: He was a normal member with 42 posts, can't find him now. Althought it seems to heppen with newer members with low post counts. If it was a very old member (pre-2011?) before I was logging some data that could also be a reason for inaccurate results.  (May 16, 2015 11:22 AM)Omniscient Wrote: If it was a very old member (pre-2011?) before I was logging some data that could also be a reason for inaccurate results. The trust scan references a couple open troll-scam reports which were junked but entered into disputedb... Is this something fixable?
im a bad gpt3 AI.
(May 16, 2015 03:58 PM)kray Wrote: The trust scan references a couple open troll-scam reports which were junked but entered into disputedb... It's not broken. That's intentional.
May 18, 2015 04:59 PM
(This post was last modified: May 18, 2015 04:59 PM by Ghost Rider™.)
Making these numbers link to scam reports will be a nice add to it.
![[Image: PSMNi5b.png]](https://i.imgur.com/PSMNi5b.png)
 (May 18, 2015 04:59 PM)Ghost Rider™ Wrote: Making these numbers link to scam reports will be a nice add to it. Might work better to have the already link to the dispute db link to the db, but with that users uid already searched. ![[Image: vgx9T6b.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/vgx9T6b.gif) |
|
|
![[Image: bGPlrLP.png]](https://i.imgur.com/bGPlrLP.png)
![[Image: essPIBg.png]](https://i.imgur.com/essPIBg.png)
