[s0c1al]

> static programs are much faster than OOP programs

bullshit.

> please proceed into exploit these vulnerabilities on the JStresser directory at http://jscanner.net/jstresser/index.php

Sure, PM me the IP if the backend servers, and i'll root em ;-)

[Shellow5]

Nullifiedvoid,

I'm not going to tell you that my parabot rune bar maker was good code. It was an old program for a rank on a website so I could sell my products. The repetitive API checks were also necessary for the Parabot API as the API would often throw NPEs and I had to catch them so my script wouldn't crash. So even if you think they are bad, they are necessary and if you don't believe me I'll prove it to you.

Please look at my other code and tell me it's shit. Also, I wasn't trying to be a dick, merely trying to help out.

[nullifiedvoid]

> static programs are much faster than OOP programs

bullshit.

> please proceed into exploit these vulnerabilities on the JStresser directory at http://jscanner.net/jstresser/index.php

Sure, PM me the IP if the backend servers, and i'll root em ;-)

I am starting to think this is a troll account.

It is fact that statically built programs are faster than OOP built programs. (OOP requires more bytecode instruction execution which equals more time)

No sir, in a real life situation, the booter owner would not give you backend ip addresses. Proceed to obtain them through the site..

[JavaProphet]

I attempted to visit the website, please turn off the obnoxious music.

[Sparta.]

Why in the fuck are you extending classes off of Object? Stop doing that, it's disgusting and outright unnecessary. Also, why are you literally hard coding everything into the main for the Server class?

Please, for the love of god.. if you're trying to teach people how to program learn to use proper Java programming conventions and at least use OOP (which Java literally is all about) rather than coding in the main like you literally just learned the language.

---

Schmidt73,

I have never in my life had anyone post to make me laugh as hard as you did. I am a mere web-security analyst. Have found 70+ vulnerabilities on Enjin and multiple on Minecraft.net. First off this code does not belong to me but DMoneigh. I believe part of the reason that he does not have a HackForums account is because of posts like these.

His code is far more efficient and well formatted compared to ANYTHING I have seen you write. Your Parabot Runebar Maker is poorly written and terribly formatted. If you knew how to correctly use APIs you would not sit here and do repetitive if-checks, as you have in your PlayerInventory class. I will not even to start and look at the structure of your code. Your getters are all out of place as they should be in regular OOP layouts. For the rest of the programmers who know how to properly program, this terribly written program can be found the link below.
https://github.com/schmidt73/Premium-PkH...-Bar-Maker

The code written in the JDOS project shows users how they can easily setup a lightweight Java Denial of Service System. I will not argue against all of your "points" that you are trying to make. What I will say though is that this code does not have to have all of these "checks" that you are talking about. You simply secure your booter site, and sanitize all requests and you will not have to worry about the information that is passed to the JDOS project. (No users should be directly interacting with your JDOS project -_-)This is what is wrong with the HackForums community right now. Too many users are steadily copying and pasting and are angry when something does not piece together. And some of the UB3R users get "bigheaded" and think that their ranks show that they are "qualified/expert programmers." There should be no need to check if hping3 is installed for the simple fact that you should FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS. Also there is no need to make the JDOSServer project OOP because it is only receiving and handling requests. Making it OOP will slow down the code tremendously. (Static programs are much faster than OOP programs) This proves that you know nothing about efficiency. The people who commented on your reputation wall would agree with me that you have NO IDEA about what you are talking about.

So I strongly recommend before you try and disrespect ones code, you need to check your own. Because from what I have seen you have no type of skill. And please do write something that is more efficient. (There is no need to write two layers of sanitation to a program...) I am waiting. I suggest writing two programs that have the same functionality, one static and one OOP. Compare times when finished. Hopefully you will learn something. Instead of adding a README to spoonfeed users, I should add a comment that says "ALERT common sense is needed." If you would like to know how to check the speed of a program an example could be found below.

Code

long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
// Code here
System.out.println((System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime) / 1000); // Print out the time in seconds how long it took to for the code to complete

Lightweight does not equal shitty code with no proper conventions or practices.

[nullifiedvoid]

Why in the fuck are you extending classes off of Object? Stop doing that, it's disgusting and outright unnecessary. Also, why are you literally hard coding everything into the main for the Server class?

Please, for the love of god.. if you're trying to teach people how to program learn to use proper Java programming conventions and at least use OOP (which Java literally is all about) rather than coding in the main like you literally just learned the language.

---

Lightweight does not equal shitty code with no proper conventions or practices.

You would have to message him directly to figure out why he is extending object.

Explain what part of his code is not using proper conventions or practices (besides extending object).

The JDOSServer does not need to be OOP at all. There is literally no point in doing so. Over-complicating the code for what?

[JavaProphet]

@nullifiedvoid I'd like to quote JFK here:
"(We do these things) not because they are easy, but because they are hard."
I personally stop caring, and am moving to C.
OOP does have it's merit's however. I'm currently writing a highly extendable CMS very OOP, because, it needs to be extendable.

[JIM NASIUM'S GYMNASIUM]

If you would like to know how to check the speed of a program an example could be found below.

Code

long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
// Code here
System.out.println((System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime) / 1000); // Print out the time in seconds how long it took to for the code to complete

Are you actually using this to test your code's efficiency? Lol.

[nullifiedvoid]

@nullifiedvoid I'd like to quote JFK here:
"(We do these things) not because they are easy, but because they are hard."
I personally stop caring, and am moving to C.
OOP does have it's merit's however. I'm currently writing a highly extendable CMS very OOP, because, it needs to be extendable.

Understandable. Could you please link me to your project? Very interested.

---

Are you actually using this to test your code's efficiency? Lol.

No, it is used to test the time it took in seconds for code to complete..

[JIM NASIUM'S GYMNASIUM]

No, it is used to test the time it took in seconds for code to complete..

I meant that anyone who actually does this to measure code runtime has no idea what the fuck they're talking about, generally.

I'm not going to provide any input on your little squabble with schmidt73, but you might want to take a look at this. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque

[nullifiedvoid]

I meant that anyone who actually does this to measure code runtime has no idea what the fuck they're talking about, generally.

I'm not going to provide any input on your little squabble with schmidt73, but you might want to take a look at this. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque

You might want to take a look at the conventions on your "Fully-Commented" C++ calculator. (http://pastebin.com/PAvec2hx) Why do you all insist on commenting on other projects and your own projects are ridiculous? There is a difference between respectfully criticizing ones project and attempting to act superior. "I meant that anyone who comments on other projects disrespectfully are terrible programmers themselves, generally."

[JIM NASIUM'S GYMNASIUM]

You might want to take a look at the conventions on your "Fully-Commented" C++ calculator. (http://pastebin.com/PAvec2hx) Why do you all insist on commenting on other projects and your own projects are ridiculous? There is a difference between respectfully criticizing ones project and attempting to act superior. I meant that anyone who comments on other projects disrespectfully are terrible programmers themselves, generally.

LOL. This account has to be a troll.

I replied not to insert myself into an argument, but you inform you that you were not actually responding to his perfectly valid criticisms, but instead criticizing the person who made them. Then in the very next post you do it again? Nobody is THIS stupid.

Buddy, I made that shit when I was in high school. I knew nothing then. Funny how your only defense is to criticize code written years ago and expect that has any relevance to this discussion whatsoever.

[nullifiedvoid]

LOL. This account has to be a troll.

I replied not to insert myself into an argument, but you inform you that you were not actually responding to his perfectly valid criticisms, but instead criticizing the person who made them. Then in the very next post you do it again? Nobody is THIS stupid.

Buddy, I made that shit when I was in high school. I knew nothing then. Funny how your only defense is to criticize code written years ago and expect that has any relevance to this discussion whatsoever.

There is no logic in any posts that are simply repeating what has already been said once. If anything, you all just want to be seen making some repetitive comment. You get out what you put in. No more replies or comments to you.

[Sparta.]

You would have to message him directly to figure out why he is extending object.

Explain what part of his code is not using proper conventions or practices (besides extending object).

The JDOSServer does not need to be OOP at all. There is literally no point in doing so. Over-complicating the code for what?

L O L.

If you think OOP over-complicates anything, especially when most IDE's generate most of the shit that 'is' OOP, then you're a god awful fucking idiot.

What's your excuse for not organizing your code to even at least (AT LEAST, god damn) by using static methods and fields in the main class? In before "it needs to be faster and more efficient". 🤣 🤣 🤣

The fact that you threw something like a DDoS program into a main class with no GUI and then labelled it as "Open-Source" just to display terrible programming that doesn't follow proper conventions for others to see proves that you don't know what the fuck you are doing.

Even the most simple tasks are programmed properly like they are supposed to because that is what programming is. You might as well have made a .bat file to do all of this shit. 🤝

---

You might want to take a look at the conventions on your "Fully-Commented" C++ calculator. (http://pastebin.com/PAvec2hx) Why do you all insist on commenting on other projects and your own projects are ridiculous? There is a difference between respectfully criticizing ones project and attempting to act superior. "I meant that anyone who comments on other projects disrespectfully are terrible programmers themselves, generally."

No, it's because you're a joke. You imply that you know how to program and then make a god awful example of a program, make it open source like it deserves the attention, and then posts a thread about it.

You have no essential inkling on why the hell the method you are doing for DDoSing is terrible let alone why your code in general does not deserve to be open source and sugar-coated as an "example for others" if it's garbage in general.

---

To make you shut the fuck up, let me prove that you have no merit to respond to someone with the assumption that YOU know shit about Java:



Thanks for proving you barely know shit about Java. You just stated in the latter image that you barely code in Java anyways, therefore substantiating why you should pack up your ass hurt baggage and leave this section.

[JIM NASIUM'S GYMNASIUM]

There is no logic in any posts that are simply repeating what has already been said once. If anything, you all just want to be seen making some repetitive comment. You get out what you put in. No more replies or comments to you.

You really are dense, aren't you?

Tell you what. Do you want me to prove why you're an idiot? Here are some simple steps that even you could follow:

1) Run your perfectly flawless code execution length test and record the results.
2) Download Prime95 and run a blend torture tests with as many threads as you have CPU cores.
3) Re-run your perfectly flawless code execution length test and observe that these results are different.