Jun 28, 2015 08:33 PM
(This post was last modified: Jun 28, 2015 08:50 PM by nullifiedvoid.)
@Sparta,
You are pretty ignorant. From the get-go it has been mentioned that these projects do not belong to me. I do not use Github. You are speaking to me as I have wrote it. There is ZERO reason for something so simple to be "organized." (Creating more classes for what??? Creating more methods for what???)
You have no proof as to whether I know little about Java or not lol. Just because I do not program in it much, does not mean I have not written programs more complex than what you are complaining about. As seen from your posts you have not written anything advanced at all. No skill shown in any of your posts. Real developers no matter what language, would not complain about programs that are so simple. They merely laugh and move on over terribly written code. But the fact that you are taking the time out to complain and cry to someone who has not written the code is quite sad. Shows how much skill you have. If it is so terrible do not say anything.
Please find a new hobby or get a job.
(Jun 28, 2015 08:08 PM)nullifiedvoid Wrote: No more replies or comments to you.
I see you neglected to respond to what I said. Did you realize why what you said was stupid?
I used to eat poop. I still do, but I used to.
(Jun 28, 2015 12:59 PM)nullifiedvoid Wrote: I am starting to think this is a troll account.
It is fact that statically built programs are faster than OOP built programs. (OOP requires more bytecode instruction execution which equals more time)
No sir, in a real life situation, the booter owner would not give you backend ip addresses. Proceed to obtain them through the site..
You're right when you say that perfectly built static programs are built are faster than non optimized OOP programs. However, just because a program is written in OOP form doesn't mean it won't get compiled down to non OOP code (think inline methods in C for example) and the code is often even further optimized by the JVM. So object oriented code can be ran exactly the same as a static program as you say. Also, Java code isn't actually static regardless of if it exists in one method as it isn't a native language and runs on the JVM.
Finally, all the code you have is in a while loop so the 10 ms delay at the very beginning of your code to create an object wouldn't change your program a bit and would make it drastically more maintainable. Don't use java if you hate OOP.
Jun 28, 2015 08:57 PM
(This post was last modified: Jun 28, 2015 08:59 PM by nullifiedvoid.)
(Jun 28, 2015 08:51 PM)Shellow5 Wrote: You're right when you say that perfectly built static programs are built are faster than non optimized OOP programs. However, just because a program is written in OOP form doesn't mean it won't get compiled down to non OOP code (think inline methods in C for example) and the code is often even further optimized by the JVM. So object oriented code can be ran exactly the same as a static program as you say. Also, Java code isn't actually static regardless of if it exists in one method as it isn't a native language and runs on the JVM.
Finally, all the code you have is in a while loop so the 10 ms delay at the very beginning of your code to create an object wouldn't change your program a bit and would make it drastically more maintainable. Don't use java if you hate OOP.
It is not about hating OOP. It is when to use OOP... Its just like creating variables for NO REASON.
My last question to you is this. Which program is faster/more efficient?
Code public static void main(String[] args) {
printHi();
}
private static void printHi() {
System.out.println("Hi");
}
or
Code public RandomConstructor() {
super();
}
public void printHi() {
System.out.println("Hi");
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
new RandomConstructor().printHi(); //Please feel free to make a RandomConstructor variable then call printHi(); as it seems a lot of you "expert programmers" like to do it anyway... lol
}
If the question is answered correctly, the arguments that you all present become equal to my name...
(Jun 28, 2015 08:33 PM)nullifiedvoid Wrote: @Sparta,
You are pretty ignorant. From the get-go it has been mentioned that these projects do not belong to me. I do not use Github. You are speaking to me as I have wrote it. There is ZERO reason for something so simple to be "organized." (Creating more classes for what??? Creating more methods for what???)
You have no proof as to whether I know little about Java or not lol. Just because I do not program in it much, does not mean I have not written programs more complex than what you are complaining about. As seen from your posts you have not written anything advanced at all. No skill shown in any of your posts. Real developers no matter what language, would not complain about programs that are so simple. They merely laugh and move on over terribly written code. But the fact that you are taking the time out to complain and cry to someone who has not written the code is quite sad. Shows how much skill you have. If it is so terrible do not say anything.
You don't know what a "real" developer is because you just proved that you don't know shit about Java.
Leave this section and let your friend respond for you next time, otherwise shut the fuck up. Thanks.
Quote:Please find a new hobby or get a job.
Don't need to, especially when I'll soon get paid $90K-100K a year for what I'll be doing. ;)
Jun 28, 2015 09:03 PM
(This post was last modified: Jun 28, 2015 09:04 PM by JIM NASIUM'S GYMNASIUM.)
It is honestly painful to visit this section sometimes. Not only do a lot of users here fail to adhere to tried and tested software design patterns, but they'll actually defend their implementations and honestly believe that their methodology is better. Meanwhile, all of the competent developers are laughing away.
I used to eat poop. I still do, but I used to.
I'm enjoying reading this thread very much! Please keep the interesting discussion going.
I'd like to add in that everything in moderation seems to be the best approach. Don't over OOP, don't over proceduralize, etc.
Jun 29, 2015 12:59 AM
(This post was last modified: Jun 29, 2015 01:01 AM by nullifiedvoid.)
(Jun 29, 2015 12:31 AM)JavaProphet Wrote: I'm enjoying reading this thread very much! Please keep the interesting discussion going.
I'd like to add in that everything in moderation seems to be the best approach. Don't over OOP, don't over proceduralize, etc.
Lol JavaProphet, your comments always have me dying. I have nothing more to say. For now and on stupid comments will not get any responses. I must say I like the conditional statement that was given to me.
(Jun 28, 2015 08:59 PM)Sparta. Wrote:Leave this section and let your friend respond for you next time, otherwise shut the fuck up. Thanks.
As if something is going to happen if I do not? I am just wondering what the repercussions are...
This seems amazing! I wish I knew Java and how to use it!
Cant wait to see what people do with the source code.
Jun 29, 2015 01:03 AM
(This post was last modified: Jun 29, 2015 01:07 AM by nullifiedvoid.)
(Jun 29, 2015 01:00 AM)Fl0werp0wer_ Wrote: This seems amazing! I wish I knew Java and how to use it!
Cant wait to see what people do with the source code.
Fl0werP0wer_,
I would not doubt if it is implemented in any new stressers in the near future.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Jun 29, 2015 01:43 AM
(This post was last modified: Jun 29, 2015 01:44 AM by Dan K.)
(Jun 28, 2015 08:57 PM)nullifiedvoid Wrote: It is not about hating OOP. It is when to use OOP... Its just like creating variables for NO REASON.
My last question to you is this. Which program is faster/more efficient?
-snip- code??
If the question is answered correctly, the arguments that you all present become equal to my name... - Bad example
- Bad design
- No meaningful difference
(Jun 29, 2015 12:31 AM)JavaProphet Wrote: I'm enjoying reading this thread very much! Please keep the interesting discussion going.
I'd like to add in that everything in moderation seems to be the best approach. Don't over OOP, don't over proceduralize, etc.
I'm sorry, what? I've not read most of this thread but I really hope your last comment wasn't regarding to Java (or C for that matter).
"don't over OOP" - KK. You realize Java's default and only programming model is object orientated, right? You can't actually do proper procedural at all hence why Looka coined the term "POOP" - procedural object orientated programming.
Also, since you're moving to C, if you really want to continue with POOP, consider C++ - you can still use C libs with it. You can mix and match all the OOP and procedural code you'd ever desire.
I POOP in Java, I POOP in C, but I agree with Linus Torvald about C++.
Wilde, I love you. You make me laugh and really brighten my day. Thank you.
(Jun 29, 2015 01:38 PM)JavaProphet Wrote: I POOP in Java, I POOP in C, but I agree with Linus Torvald about C++.
Wilde, I love you. You make me laugh and really brighten my day. Thank you.
I'm glad m8 gud luk w/ future developementss.
(Jun 29, 2015 01:03 AM)nullifiedvoid Wrote: Fl0werP0wer_,
I would not doubt if it is implemented in any new stressers in the near future.
No one is using your friend's shitty source code to create a booter. Absolutely terrible.
(Jun 29, 2015 12:59 AM)nullifiedvoid Wrote: Lol JavaProphet, your comments always have me dying. I have nothing more to say. For now and on stupid comments will not get any responses. I must say I like the conditional statement that was given to me.
As if something is going to happen if I do not? I am just wondering what the repercussions are...
Ironic considering you are responding to criticism that doesn't apply to you, but to your "friend". You proved that you are ignorant by responding to criticism that is directly for your FRIEND, not YOU. You already proved that you don't know shit about Java and I substantiated that in a previous post.
Repercussions? Here, I'll list the repercussions here:
1. People now think you are ignorant as fuck.
2. People now think you are delusional and somewhat incapable of programming.
3. Back to 1.
|
