[garypart101]

I have been an avid user of Nanocore for quite awhile and just recently discovered Luminosity on the radar. After recently getting adjusted to it, I have got to say its a really stable rat. After recently putting it to the test all my clients came back online safely upon login. My Indian call centers came 10 seconds late apart, but thats common because the Internet in over there is slow. Anyways what makes it such a good rat?

[nabil779]

I have been an avid user of Nanocore for quite awhile and just recently discovered Luminosity on the radar. After recently getting adjusted to it, I have got to say its a really stable rat. After recently putting it to the test all my clients came back online safely upon login. My Indian call centers came 10 seconds late apart, but thats common because the Internet in over there is slow. Anyways what makes it such a good rat?

bit overated but a good product i guess. probably stable because once apon a time it didnt even show you the online time what your client was doing etc..

[Illuminatiž]

I heard the FBI are very good programmers.

[garypart101]

bit overated but a good product i guess. probably stable because once apon a time it didnt even show you the online time what your client was doing etc..

Well it sure as hell beats Nanocore. I lost 3/4 of my Indian call centers on Nanocore I do not understand your last sentence.

[Yellowdock]

I heard the FBI are very good programmers.

/thread

[ℛoot]

I personally do not like LL. Never liked it I liked Plasma more xD

[goldpieces]

i am personally using LL , i have also tried others but LL is a lot stable and never disappointed me yet :)
I will say its the best RAT out there

[ToeCrusher]

the ability of the coder tbh

[Incendiary.]

Features and the support.
Luminosity has the best support of any RAT on hackforums.

[Armada]

I heard the FBI are very good programmers.

Made me lol. KFC is no fed.
What makes the client and server so stable is the fact as complex as the code is, its designed to keep its functionality in its own modules. (Code level)

Programming anything especially after revisions gets complex. KFC has kept the run environment very clean in this aspect. as his back end code should be considered the same.

[Xeri]

I personally do not like LL. Never liked it I liked Plasma more xD

Plasma rat was quite a mess tho ...
and the Miner was bugged

[6e756c6c]

There is a ton of disinformation here, the code isn't more stable because it's in different modules and it's not more stable than other tools necessarily because of skill. The reason LL is more likely to retain clients is because of the system hooks it employs that hide it from the file system, startup, and task manager (as I understand it). Obviously this is going to prevent users from removing it in most cases unless they really know what they are doing; that is, for all intensive purposes, the sole reason it appears to be more stable. I'm not sure stable would be the correct term either, it's more so a consistency or persistence issue with other tools.

Edit:
Also, the anti-virus disabler really helps it keep clients too; but that's at huge risk to the user base.

[JaGLY]

I am not a big fan of it myself although i do recommend it. As many people already mentioned is that it is stable due the code it has; So definitely a coder that knows how he's software rolls. 🤝

[Armada]

There is a ton of disinformation here, the code isn't more stable because it's in different modules and it's not more stable than other tools necessarily because of skill. The reason LL is more likely to retain clients is because of the system hooks it employs that hide it from the file system, startup, and task manager (as I understand it). Obviously this is going to prevent users from removing it in most cases unless they really know what they are doing; that is, for all intensive purposes, the sole reason it appears to be more stable. I'm not sure stable would be the correct term either, it's more so a consistency or persistence issue with other tools.

Edit:
Also, the anti-virus disabler really helps it keep clients too; but that's at huge risk to the user base.

But others employ similiar hooks to the system for binary retention and yet they fail?
My testing alone between the different binaries showed me LLs stability beyond others.

Luminosity handles requests more effectively than many other rats, nanocore included. When the user throws multiple requests to a client without waiting for the last requests reply, traditionally the binary either becomes unresponsive or simply terminates due to program exception.
Luminosity does not (usually). Be it whatever it might be, cleaner code, better error handling, whatever it is. The Binaries tend to remain longer and with less incident.

I agree with the AV killer statement, and avoid using such features myself.

[Targaryen_]

I agree with the AV killer statement, and avoid using such features myself.

Why? Isn't AV killer boss in keeping clients?