Apr 6, 2016 09:09 PM
(This post was last modified: Apr 6, 2016 11:14 PM by SIM-2908357.)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
v1
v2
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Version 1 vs. Version 2, which one is better?
Is there anything I could improve on?
Thanks.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
looks so regular tbh, like ive seen it a million times
Apr 6, 2016 09:24 PM
(This post was last modified: Apr 6, 2016 09:24 PM by 98329101-41201.)
I like where version two is going, but something you did created this weird haze effect and it's making everything look soft and blurred.
The stars are a nice touch, still follows the color scheme and plain and simple is almost always a good choice for designs, but the text feels a little too high when I read it, you could lower it a bit and you'd be on point I think.
(Apr 6, 2016 09:10 PM)eucl0tan1 Wrote: looks so regular tbh, like ive seen it a million times
pretty much this. extremely saturated concept
the size is also awkward and small
I say version 2 if you make the corners rounded. Also, Line up the stars and diamonds, they are uneven.
Apr 6, 2016 10:38 PM
(This post was last modified: Apr 6, 2016 10:38 PM by SIM-2908357.)
Slight edit on version 3, let me know what you think.
Tried to make it in a similar style of my signature.
I like the style of your art on your site, how much do you charge?
(Apr 6, 2016 10:55 PM)RaiderNation Wrote: I like the style of your art on your site, how much do you charge?
I only do designs for personal use as a hobby.
Currently not doing any graphics for anyone, sorry.
I like the improvements to version 2, but make the text a bit brighter, it's so faded in color that it's not even popping out at the viewer and make the diamond in the background a little bit darker, it's very hard to see and would give it a nice touch.
Start earning same day of purchase needs to be given more opacity because it's very transparent and with smaller signatures like this that's a bad thing, puts unwanted strain that most people won't bother with.
(Apr 6, 2016 11:03 PM)98329101-41201 Wrote: I like the improvements to version 2, but make the text a bit brighter, it's so faded in color that it's not even popping out at the viewer and make the diamond in the background a little bit darker, it's very hard to see and would give it a nice touch.
Start earning same day of purchase needs to be given more opacity because it's very transparent and with smaller signatures like this that's a bad thing, puts unwanted strain that most people won't bother with.
Improved the lighting of the text.
Thanks for the tip.
Apr 6, 2016 11:46 PM
(This post was last modified: Apr 6, 2016 11:54 PM by 98329101-41201.)
The text for Sparkling Cash is still pretty dim at the moment, you just need to make it brighter man, you've been raising it up slowly, but I don't know if it's design choice and preference or what, but if you like it that's fine, but it's going to suffer in the end if you plan on using it to attract people because it doesn't pop out.
I'm not sure if it's just the font or what, but it looks like you didn't properly scale this down or you didn't work in a bigger scale first.
You should always try to make the image at least 4 times bigger than the final result and work on it that way, gives the design a much sharper look and allows you to go in and edit much easier for the final product.
It also says it's 650x200, but that's clearly not 650x200, you forgot to crop it down mate, center tags work on images if that's why it's not cropped down or you might of just forgot, I'm not sure.
I'm not trying to be a stickler, but just some points and tips I'm trying to throw out coming from a viewer sample point of view.
v2 for me, i prefer v2. :)
(Apr 6, 2016 11:46 PM)98329101-41201 Wrote: The text for Sparkling Cash is still pretty dim at the moment, you just need to make it brighter man, you've been raising it up slowly, but I don't know if it's design choice and preference or what, but if you like it that's fine, but it's going to suffer in the end if you plan on using it to attract people because it doesn't pop out.
I'm not sure if it's just the font or what, but it looks like you didn't properly scale this down or you didn't work in a bigger scale first.
You should always try to make the image at least 4 times bigger than the final result and work on it that way, gives the design a much sharper look and allows you to go in and edit much easier for the final product.
It also says it's 650x200, but that's clearly not 650x200, you forgot to crop it down mate, center tags work on images if that's why it's not cropped down or you might of just forgot, I'm not sure.
I'm not trying to be a stickler, but just some points and tips I'm trying to throw out coming from a viewer sample point of view.
Good suggestion with the scaling, I'll definitely have to try that out.
Also, I didn't make the text brighter because it wouldn't fit the color scheme of the background anymore.
Overall, do you think it's a decent signature?
(Apr 7, 2016 07:23 AM)SIM-2908357 Wrote: Good suggestion with the scaling, I'll definitely have to try that out.
Also, I didn't make the text brighter because it wouldn't fit the color scheme of the background anymore.
Overall, do you think it's a decent signature?
I mean personally for me it's a little too dark to pop out and a bit too small, but it's a lot better than most signatures I see on here.
iYeah I would say it's decent in the very least, much better than your average on here.
(Apr 7, 2016 11:52 AM)98329101-41201 Wrote: I mean personally for me it's a little too dark to pop out and a bit too small, but it's a lot better than most signatures I see on here.
iYeah I would say it's decent in the very least, much better than your average on here.
Well that's good to hear, thanks.
Going to keep practicing ;)
|