[Ғояѕакεη™]

very good idea in my opinion and if this could be applied to apps in future releases it will make alot of us feel safer

[Contend]

By the time they open it, they will already be infected.

[Meep]

This would be a such better idea, please keep infecting me when they say they're helping me out

[Zach]

Orgy, you could simply make it a website based, and not program based.

[South Park]

Woah, great idea, I think I'm going to implant this in the future versions of my products. Great idea.

[Orgy]

Orgy, you could simply make it a website based, and not program based.

Website based? What are you on about

[Zach]

Website based? What are you on about

Buy hosting, open a website.

Give the users the url for a test, code it to blacklist IP's or some shit after 1 attempt to dos.

Basically, you know what a regular shell looks like? Create one and when someone dos's it commands the other 250 shells or however many you have.

[Orgy]

Buy hosting, open a website.

Give the users the url for a test, code it to blacklist IP's or some shit after 1 attempt to dos.

Basically, you know what a regular shell looks like? Create one and when someone dos's it commands the other 250 shells or however many you have.

What in the hell are you talking about?

[Zach]

What in the hell are you talking about?

This is stressing me out.

Okay, Orgy, instead of making a client, why don't you consider coding a website that can command all of your shells you own.

Think of it like this.

I'm on a shell site, do you know what a shell site typically looks like?

So, create a shell site, this shell site Orgy will command all of the shells you list, for example, lets say you own 10 shells.

When the person clicks enter, it commands your shells to attack that site.

1 website that commands all of your shells to attack a IP, like a webpanel.

Remember when you made that webversion? The free thing would be just like that, but it commands all of your shells IP's.

You could code it to not allow the same IP to attack over and over.

[Orgy]

That has nothing to do with this thread.

[thedankestmeme]

[img]http://ex0.in/s/0bc781a34b63acd1c6414df2b0dd33e1.PNG[/img]

[hyperstream]

Encrypt the MD5 string(s)

[bblokar]

[img]http://ex0.in/s/0bc781a34b63acd1c6414df2b0dd33e1.PNG[/img]

Implying an average hackforums user has enough mental capabilities to use a hex editor.

[thedankestmeme]

Implying an average hackforums user has enough mental capabilities to use a hex editor.

Implying that, in reality, averages are the only thing that matter.

[xvisceral]

Encrypt the MD5 string(s)

Needs to be a strong encryption, or it's basically useless.

I think I may implement a MD5 check on Blackshades... I don't think it is necessary, but it's worth a try