u can improve it by putting my name in the header 🤭
“I wish I could say everything in one word. I hate all the things that can happen between the beginning of a sentence and the end.” ~ Leonard Cohen
How do you think the marketplace should be improved? || Bring Back "Reviewers" |
(Dec 28, 2016 10:00 PM)SIM-2501407 Wrote: But that already exists? I honestly never saw that before LOL thank you for pointing that out.
Dec 29, 2016 12:35 AM
(This post was last modified: Dec 29, 2016 12:35 AM by שֵׁד.)
(Dec 28, 2016 11:19 AM)Vittorio Wrote: Getting rid of any sales of eBooks. agree, e book sales are pretty trash. (Dec 28, 2016 10:02 PM)ElDoc Wrote: For sure!! reviewers that dont get paid off or reviewers that are not the OP's friend
The old reviewers group was garbage. They cared about design and what they perceived as originality more than practicality, application and execution.
A review is worthless if the reviewer doesn't full understand what they're reviewing, as was the case more often than not. Legitimate vouches from sales is what really matters.
Dec 29, 2016 01:30 AM
(This post was last modified: Dec 29, 2016 01:08 PM by SIM-2501407.)
(Dec 28, 2016 10:02 PM)ElDoc Wrote: For sure!!I am glad to hear more support from the community. (Dec 29, 2016 12:34 AM)Truly Wrote: I honestly never saw that before LOL thank you for pointing that out.Haha, no problem buddy! (Dec 29, 2016 01:16 AM)SUI-3183372 Wrote: The old reviewers group was garbage. They cared about design and what they perceived as originality more than practicality, application and execution.I've not heard much about the previous group, so I appreciate the information. I agree with what you stated about a review being pointless if the reviewer has no idea about what they are speaking about. That'd be an issue for the group if it was to be created. If I were to recruit people that have a vast amount of knowledge in each scene, then it would led to better reviews. If nobody in then group has knowledge on a given thread's topic, then we would have to simply opt out the opportunity to review it; even in the case that the OP offered a copy to the group to review it, we would not accept it. If sellers are willing to work with the group, I can see this going very far. Code (Dec 29, 2016 03:44 AM)James! Wrote: I spoke to a few eBook sellers and marketplace sellers on here, you know some people go on leaked eBook sites and take old eBooks that used to be HF over 2 years ago and just give them a new title, they then go onto their btc or paypal and inspect element, ask a couple friends to inspect element their money as well and there you have a best selling product, same thing with ratings - they'll get their friend to give it a 5* rating.That is exactly what is going on.
I think a group called Red Lions tried this reviewing thing and it didn't work out for them. I believe it's not a good idea to have a Reviewers group as it can be abused by a few sellers who might have friends in the group which will in turn only make it worse for consumers as most reviews will be biased. Additionally it's only a way of getting free copies while not doing much to improve the marketplace.
Dec 29, 2016 12:52 PM
(This post was last modified: Dec 29, 2016 12:58 PM by SUI-3183372.)
(Dec 29, 2016 12:44 PM)Sholi Wrote: I think a group called Red Lions tried this reviewing thing and it didn't work out for them. I believe it's not a good idea to have a Reviewers group as it can be abused by a few sellers who might have friends in the group which will in turn only make it worse for consumers as most reviews will be biased. Additionally it's only a way of getting free copies while not doing much to improve the marketplace. There used to be an official HF group called "Reviewers." It eventually turned into a circle jerk of idiocy and corruption. Reviewers opened here: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=255717 Idk if there's an official thread for it, but Reviewers were disbanded Sept 2, 2011 and seen here: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=234186
Dec 29, 2016 06:55 PM
(This post was last modified: Dec 29, 2016 06:55 PM by SirAlex.)
No, reviewers wouldn't not work. You do realize that they were corrupt and took "bribes" back in the day. Whats to say future reviewers wouldn't do the same. I say to do away with ebooks, But it doesn't look like its gonna happen so end of story. If ebooks bother you dont buy them. I dont buy them as I know there full of bullcrap.
(Dec 29, 2016 06:55 PM)SirAlex Wrote: No, reviewers wouldn't not work. You do realize that they were corrupt and took "bribes" back in the day. Whats to say future reviewers wouldn't do the same. I say to do away with ebooks, But it doesn't look like its gonna happen so end of story. If ebooks bother you dont buy them. I dont buy them as I know there full of bullcrap.They WERE corrupted. I would be in charge of the reviewers usegroup... This is not some mission of mine so I may take a few bribes. If I am going to pay $5k for a usergroup, it will not be the same. This concept can be applied to more than ebooks; It could be from a wide range of products and services. I have also explained briefly how would keep tabs on those who are a part of the group. Of course I need to keep thinking about this. Code (Dec 29, 2016 08:03 PM)SIM-2501407 Wrote: They WERE corrupted. I would be in charge of the reviewers usegroup... This is not some mission of mine so I may take a few bribes. If I am going to pay $5k for a usergroup, it will not be the same. This concept can be applied to more than ebooks; It could be from a wide range of products and services. BOLD: This right there is why this will be corrupted lol. Dont bother wasting your $5k, Omni probably wouldn't allow this sort of group anyhow. (Dec 29, 2016 08:34 PM)SirAlex Wrote: BOLD: This right there is why this will be corrupted lol."Wasting 5k" It is my money, so I may do what I want with it. I want to purchase a usergroup regardless of what I do with it. This was an idea of mine of what I would want to do. Also, money is not everything in life... You can't pretend as if it is or is it will dominate your life. Also, Omniscient is probably fully aware of this now. He read a PM I sent to him earlier. Although he did not respond, I know for a fact he looked into my account. There is something that I noticed that he did to my account, but I will not go into specific details. Here is a portion of what I sent in the PM: http://image.prntscr.com/image/55e8da69f...5754af.png I also do not know if he would allow this sort of group, but I am willing to find out. Code (Dec 28, 2016 11:19 AM)2000 Wrote: I think HF should hire special staff members that will check each product. Before they post the thread the staffs need to approve it.worst idea perm denied
Dec 29, 2016 08:52 PM
(This post was last modified: Dec 29, 2016 08:53 PM by SIM-2501407.)
(Dec 29, 2016 08:49 PM)FamousHater Wrote: worst ideaHahaha, I know what you are referring to. (Dec 29, 2016 08:51 PM)Uilekejo Wrote: It would be better if the moderators actually banned scammers lol, most of them do not even care about scamming since they never get banned https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...d=53624175 They do ban scammers, but I know there are times where they do not. Code |
|
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||
| Thread / Author | Replies | Views | Last Post |
| by CapJul 5, 2025 05:55 PM | 39 | 2,207 |
Jul 5, 2025 05:55 PM Last Post: sejjel |
| [Coming Soon] by DrizNov 23, 2020 02:38 AM | 0 | 125 |
Nov 23, 2020 02:38 AM Last Post: Driz |
| [Product Release] by VIXVMar 1, 2020 11:18 AM | 9 | 251 |
Mar 1, 2020 11:18 AM Last Post: funtela |