Jan 8, 2017 07:59 PM
(This post was last modified: Jun 8, 2017 08:18 AM by Pumpkins.)
A new thread is coming soon.
![[Image: cWKoYK1.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/cWKoYK1.gif)
New thread coming soon. |
|
Jan 8, 2017 07:59 PM
(This post was last modified: Jun 8, 2017 08:18 AM by Pumpkins.)
A new thread is coming soon.
![]()
Jan 8, 2017 08:22 PM
(This post was last modified: Jan 8, 2017 08:23 PM by LanMan.)
Nice, something unique for a change !
With all these upcoming java RAT that's a good thing. Edit: your site is all broken on my side (+ non-verified ssl warning) (Jan 8, 2017 08:22 PM)LanMan Wrote: Nice, something unique for a change ! Any page is particular? All works on my end. And yeah, I thought something like this would be needed, so I'm just putting it out there. 🤝 ![]() (Jan 8, 2017 08:30 PM)Pumpkins Wrote: Any page is particular? All works on my end. https://i.imgur.com/PxMAFcX.png I got that on the main page, and others like TOS page. Purchase page seems fine. Ye, GLWS. ✌
Jan 9, 2017 02:59 AM
(This post was last modified: Jan 9, 2017 02:59 AM by Ar1a.)
after a long time have seen a Java crypter.
(Jan 9, 2017 02:15 AM)Computerjul Wrote: Will this work with SllentBytes or isnt this neccessary for this RAT ?SilentBytes is coded in .net so it wont work with this crypter.
Jan 9, 2017 03:04 AM
(This post was last modified: Jan 9, 2017 03:09 AM by Computerjul.)
Whow .. did u just say .net ??? Could u explain to me what the fuck i am missunderstanding here becausei thought it is a java rat without any dependencie.. coder said a crypter wont be needed .. on the other hand u just said somewhere else that most java rats will not stay fud at all and u updated ur crypter for java rat.
Thanks in advance
Jan 9, 2017 04:48 AM
(This post was last modified: Jan 9, 2017 05:04 AM by Pumpkins.)
(Jan 9, 2017 03:06 AM)IntelCore8700K Wrote: Pumpkins do you offer any discount to OSCelestial owners? Lmk man yes, please PM me if interested. (Jan 9, 2017 03:04 AM)Computerjul Wrote: Whow .. did u just say .net ??? Could u explain to me what the fuck i am missunderstanding here becausei thought it is a java rat without any dependencie.. coder said a crypter wont be needed .. on the other hand u just said somewhere else that most java rats will not stay fud at all and u updated ur crypter for java rat. silentbytes rat is made in java and should be supported by jfuzzle (Jan 8, 2017 10:06 PM)French Products Wrote: Ahhhhhhh you had a great idea, GLWS. Thank you, I appreciate it. ![]() (Jan 9, 2017 02:59 AM)Ar1a Wrote: after a long time have seen a Java crypter. WTF is wrong with u ? :D (Jan 9, 2017 04:48 AM)Pumpkins Wrote: silentbytes rat is made in java and should be supported by jfuzzle That is the statement what i was waiting for.. i am a bit confused of these different statements here :/ Goddam whats the point of that xD (Jan 9, 2017 05:42 AM)Computerjul Wrote: WTF is wrong with u ? :D MY bad, I thought silentbytes was coded in .net (Jan 9, 2017 06:03 AM)Ar1a Wrote: MY bad, I thought silentbytes was coded in .net Things happen.. i was very confused xD |
|
|