Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

Scammed by Billie Joe ($525) - UID= 2052441 // Multi-Accounter

Haha... I knew this thread was going to get interesting.... LMAO.... The amount of lies on this forum really cracks me the fuck up.
(Jul 3, 2017 09:18 PM)Mr. Robot Wrote:  I have multiple users as friends on discord who have multiple accounts.

I have also caught multiple users in the past having multiple discord accounts for scamming.

The post above was to show how much of a hypocrite he was being and was only relevant to that fact.

I cannot provide any on site proof currently of this however gimme a few days and i'll take some irl screenshots.

Ok, so your evidence is that just because you have friends on Discord that have multiple Discord accounts? That's just plain stupid.

If OP was going to do a deal in the first place with Billie Joe, wouldn't you think they would first ask them to confirm their identity on HF in a PM before making any deals or hell even if "Who Soup" was being the middle man of the deal, why didn't he confirm who "Joe" was. It just doesn't add up to me.
I honestly would be shocked to think that Billie scammed someone, but if he did I would love to see some factual proof that, the "Joe" Discord is his. I am totally against scammers, but I don't appreciate false claims against people as that ruins a name especially when there isn't any true definite proof behind it other than an accusation.
(Jul 3, 2017 09:20 PM)TheSuspect Wrote:  ignore previous

edit: me saying thats a legit report is true though, there was on site confirmation and everything, you saying legit report to this is not true, there is literally 0 proof, no on site confirmation or anything, just a random on discord.

User seems to still be active, mustn't have been legit enough.

https://hackforums.net/member.php?action...id=2843420


(Jul 3, 2017 09:25 PM)Daddy‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎ Wrote:  I don't appreciate false claims against people as that ruins a name especially when there isn't any true definite proof behind it other than an accusation.

I would agree with you but nobody else in Echo would.
(Jul 3, 2017 09:31 PM)Mr. Robot Wrote:  User seems to still be active, mustn't have been legit enough.

https://hackforums.net/member.php?action...id=2843420

Bandors is still active, you out of all people should know that staff don't get involved in deal disputes.
[Image: K7BC7pn.gif]
(Jul 3, 2017 09:32 PM)TheSuspect Wrote:  Bandors is still active, you out of all people should know that staff don't get involved in deal disputes.

No but when it comes to multis they do - so once we pick up a few more pieces of the puzzle, cya billie.
We all know it's true, one of the requirements of being in Echo is you have to be a multi or a dick suck to h3god. Usually both.
(Jul 3, 2017 09:33 PM)Mr. Robot Wrote:  No but when it comes to multis they do - so once we pick up a few more pieces of the puzzle, cya billie.
We all know it's true, one of the requirements of being in Echo is you have to be a multi or a dick suck to h3god. Usually both.

1Kodak isn't a multi though. Neither is bandors, both have unresolved scam reports, so according to you Kodak would be banned if the scam report was legit which it is and bandors shouldn't? what?
[Image: K7BC7pn.gif]
(Jul 3, 2017 09:35 PM)TheSuspect Wrote:  1Kodak isn't a multi though. Neither is bandors, both have unresolved scam reports, so according to you Kodak would be banned if the scam report was legit which it is and bandors shouldn't? what?

I see enough proof in the OP for Billie to be closed for this monstrosity.
(Jul 3, 2017 09:35 PM)TheSuspect Wrote:  1Kodak isn't a multi though. Neither is bandors.

Seriously? Anyone can be a multi dude... How are you 100% sure they are not multis unless you live with them or something???


For fuck sakes anyone with SOCKS can be a multi.
(Jul 3, 2017 09:37 PM)Mr. Robot Wrote:  I see enough proof in the OP for Billie to be closed for this monstrosity.

Could you point it out please? I can't make the connection to Billie from the info that OP has supplied.


(Jul 3, 2017 09:38 PM)testpen101 Wrote:  Seriously? Anyone can be a multi dude... How are you 100% sure they are not multis unless you live with them or something???


For fuck sakes anyone with SOCKS can be a multi.

I'm just saying because Robot claims that the report on 1Kodak is not legit because he didn't get banned, I then respond with the valid point that staff don't get involved in deal disputes so Robot takes the conversation off to the whole multi thing, basically saying that Kodak didn't get banned for scamming because he isn't a multi. Also changes the conversation when I question his logic and goes back to talking about how Billie is guilty.
[Image: K7BC7pn.gif]
(Jul 3, 2017 09:39 PM)TheSuspect Wrote:  Could you point it out please? I can't make the connection to Billie from the info that OP has supplied.



I'm just saying because Robot claims that the report on 1Kodak is not legit because he didn't get banned, I then respond with the valid point that staff don't get involved in deal disputes so Robot takes the conversation off to the whole multi thing, basically saying that Kodak didn't get banned for scamming because he isn't a multi. Also changes the conversation when I question his logic and goes back to talking about how Billie is guilty.


Oh i'm just doing what you do and the other users do on my threads and other users threads of people you don't like. It's not much fun, I don't see why you lot do it.
(Jul 3, 2017 09:39 PM)TheSuspect Wrote:  Could you point it out please? I can't make the connection to Billie from the info that OP has supplied.



I'm just saying because Robot claims that the report on 1Kodak is not legit because he didn't get banned, I then respond with the valid point that staff don't get involved in deal disputes so Robot takes the conversation off to the whole multi thing, basically saying that Kodak didn't get banned for scamming because he isn't a multi

Ok but don't be saying random people aren't multis cause you have no idea who the hell they are. You can be a multi, I can be a multi, robot can be a multi but we know we are not so there is no reason for you to say that someone else is not multi if you not them or live with them or have physical proof they are not multis.


Wearing SOCKS is not that hard kid.
(Jul 3, 2017 09:45 PM)- Sam - Wrote:  i would love to see your off-site group chat where you all fucking cry like little girls asking people to post on your behalf.

By the looks of it Billie Joe sent his "GANG GANG GANG" to this thread to support him and back him up.
(Jul 3, 2017 09:46 PM)testpen101 Wrote:  By the looks of it Billie Joe sent his "GANG GANG GANG" to this thread to support him and back him up.

More like it's just common sense that Joe isn't Billie Joe lol

He just put pieces together that don't fit.
I personally can guarantee the guy who scammed OP is not Billie Joe as some of you think.
If I end up being wrong, I'll 6 month myself hold me to it.

Billie also makes way too much money to waste his time in some stupid bullshit like this.

Continue arguing among yourselves though.
(Jul 3, 2017 09:50 PM)The Last Username Wrote:  Weren't you banned a couple months ago for being an arrogant multi?

oh duck you caught me 😵


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
by Injun JoeDec 30, 2020 02:15 PM 4 141 Dec 30, 2020 02:15 PM
Last Post: Blogger
by Joe MatadoreSep 30, 2019 04:47 AM 2 96 Sep 30, 2019 04:47 AM
Last Post: Joe Matadore
by 335iSep 23, 2019 06:08 PM 14 329 Sep 23, 2019 06:08 PM
Last Post: 335i