DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jul 9, 2017 06:06 PM)Happeh Wrote: You and I both know the use of "gang" has negative connotations. You're using language to reinforce your claims.
Sorry to see you so pessimistic, Gary. Hopefully, after the drama has calmed down and in a few months you try and see the good that some of us are just trying to do and if it helps or not, that's a separate case. I can't speak for others, but I only joined because I wanted to try and help, and that should be a good enough reason. As I said we don't just buy ebooks, sellers come to us and we offer a service.
Just the way I talk on here lol, you can't blame my use of terms.
I'm not pessimistic, remember what happened last time we had a "team" of reviewers? Bad things. How is what you're doing anything different? What's stopping one of you from getting a payment on the lowkey to make the eBook look a little better than complete trash? Nothing. We the community don't see this. You guys don't provide any proof that sellers are coming to you. I'm sure sellers wouldn't mind you guys showing a PM conversation.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jul 9, 2017 06:09 PM)Riyu Wrote: It was you lol wtf
Now is not really the time to troll around. Everyone in Revolution discord (since I'm most active there) knows what wasn't me.
H3God is here, this thread is evolving into an anti-mr.reviewer thread lmao
Give me 10 bytes for a rep.
(Jul 9, 2017 06:09 PM)Gary Wrote: Just the way I talk on here lol, you can't blame my use of terms.
I'm not pessimistic, remember what happened last time we had a "team" of reviewers? Bad things. How is what you're doing anything different? What's stopping one of you from getting a payment on the lowkey to make the eBook look a little better than complete trash? Nothing. We the community don't see this. You guys don't provide any proof that sellers are coming to you. I'm sure sellers wouldn't mind you guys showing a PM conversation.
Sharing PM's isn't allowed unless used as evidence in a deal dispute far as I'm aware. Again, you don't know but we're just trying to help for the most part. I can't speak for the others but I'm not here trying to take donations and ruin my account.
Look, if you want to continue this train of thought feel free to open up another thread or PM me, ya know I'm always good to talk. But right now this thread isn't about this or the gang. It's about Mr. Reviewer, all I was trying to do is diffuse this conception that "his reviewer team" is in on anything when it was an individual act.
(Jul 9, 2017 06:11 PM)GloryToBe Wrote: H3God is here, this thread is evolving into an anti-mr.reviewer thread lmao
He's doing reviews but is selling an ebook himself. What stops him from reviewing all other ebooks as shit so he can get more sales on his lmao. Also if he was making money on g2a why does he need to buy other ebooks in the first place? Some people on the forum see him as a hero but he's literally doing the same shit as us by selling an ebook lmao.
(Jul 9, 2017 06:15 PM)Greg Wrote: He's doing reviews but is selling an ebook himself. What stops him from reviewing all other ebooks as shit so he can get more sales on his lmao. Also if he was making money on g2a why does he need to buy other ebooks in the first place? Some people on the forum see him as a hero but he's literally doing the same shit as us by selling an ebook lmao.
I think it's hypocritical but that doesn't mean his view is bullshit, discrediting an ebook seller won't give him sales as there are so many ebook sellers.
Give me 10 bytes for a rep.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jul 9, 2017 06:14 PM)Happeh Wrote: Sharing PM's isn't allowed unless used as evidence in a deal dispute far as I'm aware. Again, you don't know but we're just trying to help for the most part. I can't speak for the others but I'm not here trying to take donations and ruin my account.
Look, if you want to continue this train of thought feel free to open up another thread or PM me, ya know I'm always good to talk. But right now this thread isn't about this or the gang. It's about Mr. Reviewer, all I was trying to do is diffuse this conception that "his reviewer team" is in on anything when it was an individual act.
Sharing PMs is allowed if both people agree to it. It happens all the time in these community alerts and normal threads.
Im sure in this case it wouldn't matter if you shared. Since in a sense all these reviews are community alerts, since pretty much they're all negative.
(Jul 9, 2017 06:18 PM)GloryToBe Wrote: I think it's hypocritical but that doesn't mean his view is bullshit, discrediting an ebook seller won't give him sales as there are so many ebook sellers.
Calling others out helps with building trust. I 've never done this, but it is proven that it works. Plus, it gets you and your product free exposure.
Jul 9, 2017 06:23 PM
(This post was last modified: Jul 9, 2017 06:32 PM by Greg.)
(Jul 9, 2017 06:18 PM)GloryToBe Wrote: I think it's hypocritical but that doesn't mean his view is bullshit, discrediting an ebook seller won't give him sales as there are so many ebook sellers.
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id55155927 - Here is an example of someone who bought his ebook because of his reviews.
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5655830 - Omni negged this guy as a multi before and he's the one who made a review for Mr. Reviewers Thread for all we know this guy who made the review can be associated with Mr. Reviewer one way or another. Oh and shiftys account was made 3 days after Mr Reviewer made his ebook thread. Coincidence?
https://gyazo.com/c832c21f7d04812b7975e449fe2c7a77
https://gyazo.com/aa72ded94960baa53de00a4668f95b16
Here's the date shifty joined and the date Mr Reviewer made his ebook thread.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Jul 9, 2017 06:26 PM
(This post was last modified: Jul 9, 2017 06:27 PM by Gary.)
(Jul 9, 2017 06:23 PM)Greg Wrote: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id55155927 - Here is an example of someone who bought his ebook because of his reviews.
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5655830 - Omni negged this guy as a multi before as a multi and he's the one who made a review for Mr. Reviewers Thread for all we know this guy who made the review can be associated with Mr. Reviewer one way or another. Oh and shiftys account was made 3 days after Mr Reviewer made his ebook thread. Coincidence?
he got negged for multi account nvm i read ur post properly heedxd!!
(Jul 9, 2017 06:23 PM)Greg Wrote: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5655830 - Omni negged this guy as a multi before and he's the one who made a review for Mr. Reviewers Thread for all we know this guy who made the review can be associated with Mr. Reviewer one way or another. Oh and shiftys account was made 3 days after Mr Reviewer made his ebook thread. Coincidence?
Reaaaally playing with fire right now.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jul 9, 2017 06:29 PM)Happeh Wrote: Reaaaally playing with fire right now.
How so? He's just posting public information. Its just a coincidence.
(Jul 9, 2017 06:23 PM)Greg Wrote: Here's the date shifty joined and the date Mr Reviewer made his ebook thread.
THIS RIGHT HERE. This "shifty" guy has something to do with Reviewer but I can't pin it yet.
ONLY DEAL ON SITE UNLESS VERIFIED BY PM FIRST
(Jul 9, 2017 06:32 PM)Gary Wrote: How so? He's just posting public information. Its just a coincidence.
Regardless of being true or not, he's loaded the argument. He's not just giving out public information, he's implying. Again I'm neither for or against here, trying to stay as indifferent as I can, but Jesus it's playing with fire.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jul 9, 2017 06:39 PM)Happeh Wrote: Regardless of being true or not, he's loaded the argument. He's not just giving out public information, he's implying. Again I'm neither for or against here, trying to stay as indifferent as I can, but Jesus it's playing with fire.
Not really. People can make assumptions with the information they can find. He's not playing with fire. The only reason it can be playing with fire if its true information and at this point you're trying divert the information away from it by saying he's playing with fire at this point.
|
