[Gay]

Having 50 green ratings, and 0 neutral/red might make someone more trusted than they really are. They could've sold 100 x $2 accounts. Why should this make them more trustworthy than someone who traded $300 btc x 10? $100 vs $3K. Market profiles should show the amount someone transacted for transparency.

[Sixen+]

Having 50 green ratings, and 0 neutral/red might make someone more trusted than they really are. They could've sold 100 x $2 accounts. Why should this make them more trustworthy than someone who traded $300 btc x 10? $100 vs $3K. Market profiles should show the amount someone transacted for transparency.

This actually isn't a bad idea as I've done many large deals but only have ~50 contracts done. Versus some people who are getting contracts for 10-15 dollar transactions.

[CyberError]

This actually isn't a bad idea as I've done many large deals but only have ~50 contracts done. Versus some people who are getting contracts for 10-15 dollar transactions.

who are getting contracts for 10-15 dollar transactions. For 5-10 Bytes too

[PerfectStorm]

I guess thats not a bad Idea im down

[Gay]

Considering the data for the amounts will always have to be there, and are already there, that problem is removed. It should just total up all of the "completed" deals.

[PerfectStorm]

Yep so remove the active or disputed deals?

[Omniscient]

What about people who make fake Contracts with friends for high amounts?

[PerfectStorm]

That is something I didn't consider.

[CyberError]

That is something I didn't consider.

but people still making fake contracts with new members

[Sixen+]

What about people who make fake Contracts with friends for high amounts?

This is already frowned upon and I believe against the rules (idk you're the rule guy, you tell me)? So they are always at risk for jeopardizing their account anyway.

[PerfectStorm]

but people still making fake contracts with new members

Yeah but displaying their fake earnings better would not help persuade them to stop.

[Gay]

What about people who make fake Contracts with friends for high amounts?

I think it would be easier to catch them then. Maybe make it so that for a minimum, of say, $500, the transaction must be public. That seems fair to me. Or, a better solution would be to create a "median" trade amount. That way one or a few transactions can't skew the number too much, and the majority of trades will make up the number shown.

[vagabond]

What about people who make fake Contracts with friends for high amounts?

isnt making fake contracts against the rules?

i'd say if you get caught creating fake contracts you should be punished.
also deals involving bytes as the only currency shouldn't be allowed to have a contract, as you could amass dozens of contracts for selling cheap things for a few bytes
just my opinion

[Omniscient]

Best solution...not to do it. We don't need this.

[PerfectStorm]

isnt making fake contracts against the rules?

i'd say if you get caught creating fake contracts you should be punished.
also deals involving bytes as the only currency shouldn't be allowed to have a contract, as you could amass dozens of contracts for selling cheap things for a few bytes
just my opinion

Of course it would be against the rules. No one is disputing that. I admit I do have contracts of buying bytes, but they are not too small.