[DOG]

Review of "Unlimited Money Printing Machine Guide"
Initial Reading: Prior to reading this method, I was a bit unsure as it is a money making method and we all know the stigma surrounding them on this forum. With that being said, the initial viewing of the document was a bit underwhelming – the first page is just a wall of text regarding some rules and information that the seller wants to tell the buyer. Eventually, though, the seller then presents the introductory steps to the method and begins to layout the things that they should expect when conducting this method and when beginning it. The method consists of 14 pages, 13 of which are for the method itself. The majority of these pages also have photos for guides for the purchaser to follow along with.

Price: This method is available for sale for $20. At first, I was a bit skeptical of the price because I thought the majority of money making books are complete and utter bullshit. Honestly, though, I see the justification behind the pricing for this method; buyers can make this money back with very minimal work. It is important to note that the cashing out portion of this method does take a decent amount of time and members do need to wait a little bit; I also am unsure as to how reputable the websites used are – with some research, I have yet to find any problematic reviews or comments.

The Method: The meat and potatoes portion of the review; this method is interesting to say the least. Prior to reading the document sent, I did not and would not have thought of this at all; I am relatively involved in the scene being used, too. The seller presents thirteen pages of steps and photos for members to follow – according to the member, if followed perfectly, buyers will garner quite a bit of profit in a 15 to 19 day span. I want it to be clear; I HAVE NOT TESTED THIS METHOD MYSELF. While I haven’t tested it, though, I would like to note that everything seems pretty viable and it is a reasonable assumption that the method would be effective in working. The member states in the first page of the document that he will only be selling this method to 100 people; whether this is true or not, I’m not sure. With regards to the formatting and layout of the method, it could be prettier and could definitely be presented to the reader in a way that is much easier to follow. When it comes to barebones method, though, I could see some money being made, I just question if it is worth it with the amount of time it takes to cash out and recognize profit. With all of this being said, I give this method a 3 out of 5 stars.

[Celibate]

Nice layed out review DOG. Question, how much money would i expect to make by the time I can withdrawl?

[DOG]

Nice layed out review DOG. Question, how much money would i expect to make by the time I can withdrawl?

Here's the thing: I don't know. I don't know fully if the website within it is viable and all. With that being said, if it is, I believe the seller showed a withdrawal of around $190 after investing $100 in a few weeks? Again, I could be wrong. I'd direct your questions to the seller.

[5H4R4F03]

Is this legit, just asking

[SUI-3183372]

1. Don't you think you should have at least verified the method works, before saying you think it might work? I'm really tired of these "well I'm no expert, and I didn't actually try the method, but vouch!" styled reviews. You're going to cause someone to get scammed eventually, and for what reason, you like to see yourself speak? I don't get why you posted this.

2.

[James Burnham]

Can you do a google search first to see if it is public or not? You may never heard it before, but sometimes that doesn't mean the method isn't public.

[DOG]

1. Don't you think you should have at least verified the method works, before saying you think it might work? I'm really tired of these "well I'm no expert, and I didn't actually try the method, but vouch!" styled reviews. You're going to cause someone to get scammed eventually, and for what reason, you like to see yourself speak? I don't get why you posted this.

2.

1. I didn’t and don’t vouch for any of the products. I review them; don’t be ignorant and put words that weren’t said. I did look up the method and didn’t find anything on it; although, that doesn’t confirm it isn’t public. Again, I am reviewing and sharing my opinions. If you don’t like that, you’re more than welcome to not read the threads — better yet, make yourself useful for the community yourself. Don’t be arrogant and bash people for trying to help the community; make yourself useful.

Can you do a google search first to see if it is public or not? You may never heard it before, but sometimes that doesn't mean the method isn't public.

I also put a blatant disclaimer stating that I haven’t tested the method. That, in itself, is a disclaimer and warning to purchase at your own risk with the recognition that, while confident it’ll work, I am not 100% certain of it. Must I put protective measures of a disclaimer saying that I don’t vouch for these methods and to purchase at your own risk? It’s a shame that common sense needs to be plastered to satisfy you.

[James Burnham]

Yes, I read the disclaimer. But can you also do a google search to make sure the document you reviewed is not unoriginal/stolen/public article or whatever? This is something that a lot of reviewers overlook. You may get a document that looks good, but it ends up being a copy paste from bhw or a blog. My question wasn't about whether you tried the method or not. It was about whether the method is public or not (based on google results).

[SUI-3183372]

Again, I am reviewing

No you're not. A review constitutes that you've at the very least tried the product.
You're simply verifying a grouping of English words exist. You don't know if the steps in the ebook are correct. You haven't verified the content. You have no clue if the product even works. All you've told us is, "yep, I see words, I think all the words are here, maybe they make sense, maybe they don't, but it looks good."

[flavoral]

I don't get it, how are you saying you're reviewing the product when you haven't tried it?

[123]

No you're not. A review constitutes that you've at the very least tried the product.
You're simply verifying a grouping of English words exist. You don't know if the steps in the ebook are correct. You haven't verified the content. You have no clue if the product even works. All you've told us is, "yep, I see words, I think all the words are here, maybe they make sense, maybe they don't, but it looks good."

Although DOG is a great guy for doing such work. But I have to agree with whatever you said. Any method reviewed must be tested by the reviewer or he must not post the review at all.

The viability of a method can only be verified if checked first hand.

DOG if you want to run this review service of yours ( which I know is free ) , you must try the methods first and then post a review.

I'm not trying to downgrade you here. It's just my opinion. I might be wrong.

[Pet_Wussy]

No you're not. A review constitutes that you've at the very least tried the product.
You're simply verifying a grouping of English words exist. You don't know if the steps in the ebook are correct. You haven't verified the content. You have no clue if the product even works. All you've told us is, "yep, I see words, I think all the words are here, maybe they make sense, maybe they don't, but it looks good."

I like you. 100% agree.

Just sayin.

inb4negativerepfromallofopsmates

[#Skyline]

Why do a review if you ain't done the method.
Get off the drugs.

[HQCheckers]

I mean as it's an ebook.. technically the review is on the quality of the ebook not the quality of the method..

I agree with everyone, maybe he should try it first, but atleast he was straight up honest and made it pretty clear he was reviewing the ebook and not the actual practical method itself...

[James Burnham]

I mean as it's an ebook.. technically the review is on the quality of the ebook not the quality of the method..

I agree with everyone, maybe he should try it first, but atleast he was straight up honest and made it pretty clear he was reviewing the ebook and not the actual practical method itself...

The community needs savage reviewers. The type of guys that can talk the harsh truth. Soft-spoken reviews are not good. Think about it, you get a review copy of a mediocre ebook, but since you talked a bit with the seller you feel like it would be very rude to give a fully honest review so instead of saying "I tried the method but I got tons of obstacles that the seller does not know how to bypass" you are saying "Maybe this method has potential, I did not try it yet". And although as a reviewer you got a free copy and you don't feel angry for losing any money, you may make others lose their money. And how that helps the HF community as a whole? Few people making money and the rest are struggling wasting their time reading some ebook from a self-proclaimed entrepreneur, CEO of an one-man unlicensed company (basically a meme).