[Ash Ketchum]

So if it's not mandatory and someone scams, what then?

Then we're back to the same issue that got us here, his crew mislead people by making him look like an official/trusted member of the community and it lead to a member being scammed.

Even if he was to ensure people with his money (which he will no doubt comment) there's no doubt he wouldn't refund any substantial amount, and this all can be avoided by simply not misleading members of the forum.

---

No where does it say it’s necessary.

---

They will be removed from the crew! 😤

It's implied, we've already established you don't like to be direct because you try and play on vague words/implications but we're not 12 this childish manipulation wont work on anyone with a brain.

[IPIKIN]

Then we're back to the same issue that got us here, his crew mislead people by making him look like an official/trusted member of the community and it lead to a member being scammed.

Even if he was to ensure people with his money (which he will no doubt comment) there's no doubt he wouldn't refund any substantial amount, and this all can be avoided by simply not misleading members of the forum.

---

It's implied, we've already established you don't like to be direct because you try and play on vague words/implications but we're not 12 this childish manipulation wont work on anyone with a brain.

It should be a forum usergroup like vendors, where they have to pay an application and holding fee to the forum not to a user

[Orchid]

You mean rn? I still am. But I am also willing to let any respectable active mm join in the monopoly.



Too bad he fugged up and got banned from HF marketplace

Ok, then add me into monopoly.

[Lavish Living]

It should be a forum usergroup like vendors, where they have to pay an application and holding fee to the forum not to a user

Omni would never.

Ok, then add me into monopoly.

Who u

[Ash Ketchum]

It should be a forum usergroup like vendors, where they have to pay an application and holding fee to the forum not to a user

I think it shouldn't exist and if it did it should be a very few selected OG members who have proven their worth because as soon as a forum especially one as big as HF puts their trust in someone they instantly become more valuable and if this was to cost even 1-2k the trust they gain they could easily scam quit for a lot more.

the only people worthy of said role would be minimalist/cooligan/killjoy/eagle imo but eagle is way too busy, killjoy is self banned and cooligan/mini aren't very active in the market anymore.

[Orchid]

Omni would never.


Who u

No, the real question is who are you? 😂

[IPIKIN]

I think it shouldn't exist and if it did it should be a very few selected OG members who have proven their worth because as soon as a forum especially one as big as HF puts their trust in someone they instantly become more valuable and if this was to cost even 1-2k the trust they gain they could easily scam quit for a lot more.

the only people worthy of said role would be minimalist/cooligan/killjoy/eagle imo but eagle is way too busy, killjoy is self banned and cooligan/mini aren't very active in the market anymore.

Isn't the point of contracts to reduce the need for a MM?

[Ash Ketchum]

Isn't the point of contracts to reduce the need for a MM?

Yeah, pretty much but there are loopholes by putting UIDS in contracts.

But unless a 3 way contract is made anything official is obsolete

[Lavish Living]

Isn't the point of contracts to reduce the need for a MM?

not at all lol. they are just an easier way to see if someone has a bad track record in the marketplace. You can clearly see negative ratings and open disputes.

Yeah, pretty much but there are loopholes by putting UIDS in contracts.

But unless a 3 way contract is made anything official is obsolete

what? There is an official spot of all contracts where you can distinguish who is the MM/escrow

[Ash Ketchum]

not at all lol. they are just an easier way to see if someone has a bad track record in the marketplace. You can clearly see negative ratings and open disputes.


what? There is an official spot of all contracts where you can distinguish who is the MM/escrow

Don't recall ever saying there wasn't?

[Lavish Living]

Don't recall ever saying there wasn't?

"Yeah, pretty much but there are loopholes by putting UIDS in contracts.

But unless a 3 way contract is made anything official is obsolete"

there is no loophole, its an official feature of contracts

there is no reason for 3 way contracts

[Ash Ketchum]

"Yeah, pretty much but there are loopholes by putting UIDS in contracts.

But unless a 3 way contract is made anything official is obsolete"

there is no loophole, its an official feature of contracts

there is no reason for 3 way contracts

Isn't 3-way contracts literally what you supported being implemented not even a day ago, the same thread that made you more of a mockery than you already were?

I'll dumb down the 3-way contract since you don't understand multiple meanings for words, any way you're incorporated to the contract between 2 other traders and in the end a b-rating is also applied to your account.

And don't take the term loophole in this so literal, it's a simple term that implies a workaround of some sort, educate yourself 'teacher'

[Hero]

If i buy in right now, would you guys trust me?

Personally, i wouldn't lol

[Ash Ketchum]

If i buy in right now, would you guys trust me?

Personally, i wouldn't lol

At this point, I would not even jokingly trust you more now than if you were to buy-in.

Because anyone who would willingly do it after all of this, their end goal is 100% exit scamming.

[Lavish Living]

Isn't 3-way contracts literally what you supported being implemented not even a day ago, the same thread that made you more of a mockery than you already were?

I'll dumb down the 3-way contract since you don't understand multiple meanings for words, any way you're incorporated to the contract between 2 other traders and in the end a b-rating is also applied to your account.

And don't take the term loophole in this so literal, it's a simple term that implies a workaround of some sort, educate yourself 'teacher'

No I never said I wanted b ratings for mming.

I just want to see the total completed contracts where a user was the middleman / escrow. That should be a very easy statistic to calculate.

The way contracts have middlemen setup is perfectly fine imo.